top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The "910 Vehicle"

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    The "910 Vehicle"

    http://www.georgiabankruptcyblog.com...red-claim.htmlhttp://www.georgiabankruptcyblog.com...n-of-debt.html
    Filed Ch 7 - 09/06
    Discharged - 12/2006
    Officially Declared No Asset - 03/2007
    Closed - 04/2007

    I am not an attorney. My comments are based on personal experience and research. Always consult an attorney in your area to address concerns related to your particular situation.

    Another good thing about being poor is that when you are seventy your children will not have declared you legally insane in order to gain control of your estate. - Woody Allen...

    #2
    Wow what a mess this law has become. Apparently the ND of GA is at odds with other districts where this has been decided. Truely a district by district thing.
    I'd imagine a lot of these issues will eventually wind up at the Supreme Court.

    Comment


      #3
      Evidently, different Courts are interpreting the Law different ways.

      The NACBA is taking on the issue of the "hanging paragraph".

      http://www.nacba.com/

      Surrender In Full Satisfaction?

      NACBA has filed an amicus brief in In re White (WDNC) which argues that 1) 910 creditors do not have "allowed secured claims" entitled to treatment under 1325(a)(5), and 2) if those creditors do have "allowed secured claims" in the full amount of the debt, then 1325(a)(5)(C) permits debtors to surrender in full satisfaction of that debt.
      Filed Ch 7 - 09/06
      Discharged - 12/2006
      Officially Declared No Asset - 03/2007
      Closed - 04/2007

      I am not an attorney. My comments are based on personal experience and research. Always consult an attorney in your area to address concerns related to your particular situation.

      Another good thing about being poor is that when you are seventy your children will not have declared you legally insane in order to gain control of your estate. - Woody Allen...

      Comment


        #4
        It seems all the courts do things a lil different according to their interpretation of the new law. Its a shamed we have such unclear as it seems to affect us all differently vs us all being treated equal.
        Filed chapter 13 January 31, 2007
        Waited and worried Febuary 1, 2007 - April 19, 2007
        Confirmed April 20, 2007

        Comment


          #5
          I know...wasn't that the whole point of having uniform bankruptcy laws throughout the country?
          DISCLAIMER: I am not an attorney. My posts are not legal advice. They are for information only. Please feel free to use them in an academic sense, as I simply wish to share with you what I have learned/researched.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by bige1030 View Post
            I know...wasn't that the whole point of having uniform bankruptcy laws throughout the country?
            As long as bankruptcy law has been interpreted by the courts, there have been differences between districts. This is nothing new.

            However, BAPCPA, in its zeal to try to remove the ability of local district judges to make decisions about bk cases on an individual basis, has created a real quagmire. We are just seeing the tip of the iceberg of case law trying to sort out the many 'black holes' in this bad law. BAPCPA is a perfect example of what happens when the very people who will benefit from a law are allowed to write it themselves without any outside input, and when sound advice about the badness of a law from bankruptcy experts and stakeholders around the country is ignored and our Congress passes it anyway.
            I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.

            06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
            06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
            07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
            10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
            01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
            09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
            06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
            08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !

            10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
            Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go

            Comment

            bottom Ad Widget

            Collapse
            Working...
            X