Greetings:
I have a question in regard to the 2nd bankruptcy budget counseling session that one is supposed to receive before one's debts can be finally discharged.
Here are the facts of my case.
On the date of August 07, 2007, I went to my bankruptcy lawyer's office and officially signed all of my filing papers for my Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition.
On the date of today, September 12, 2007, I attended my "meeting of the creditors", which was presided by the bankruptcy trustee.
There were no complications. None of my creditors appeared. After asking me a few questions, the trustee told me that I was "dismissed."
However, the attorney who showed up in court today was NOT the one I had originally talked to. She was a substitute attorney, from the same law practice, who had taken the place of my original attorney.
After I was dismissed, she reminded me to be sure to make arrangements to take my 2nd bankruptcy budget counseling session.
I had already completed my first one.
Now then. Here is where I am confused.
She told me that I am required to take this 2nd bankruptcy budget counseling session within 45 days after the date I signed my bankruptcy petition papers -- which was back on the date of August 07, 2007.
This took me by surprise. I thought that this session was supposed to be completed within 45 days after the date of my creditor's meeting -- which was today, September 12, 2007.
If what she is saying is correct, then YIKES!
I have to get this done by next week!!!
I could have sworn that I read that I had 45 days after today, September 12, 2007, which was the date of my court hearing, to get this done.
Is the substitute bankruptcy attorney, who appeared in court to represent me today, right about me having to complete this 2nd bankruptcy session within 45 days after my official filing date of August 07, 2007?
Or is it within 45 days after today, September 12, 2007, after all?
Ultimately, it makes no difference, as I have made plans to go ahead and get this done next Monday.
I am just curious as to whether my substitute attorney might be right or if she might be mistaken.
If it makes any difference, I live in the state of Virginia.
Thanks in advance.
Best Wishes,
Munch
I have a question in regard to the 2nd bankruptcy budget counseling session that one is supposed to receive before one's debts can be finally discharged.
Here are the facts of my case.
On the date of August 07, 2007, I went to my bankruptcy lawyer's office and officially signed all of my filing papers for my Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition.
On the date of today, September 12, 2007, I attended my "meeting of the creditors", which was presided by the bankruptcy trustee.
There were no complications. None of my creditors appeared. After asking me a few questions, the trustee told me that I was "dismissed."
However, the attorney who showed up in court today was NOT the one I had originally talked to. She was a substitute attorney, from the same law practice, who had taken the place of my original attorney.
After I was dismissed, she reminded me to be sure to make arrangements to take my 2nd bankruptcy budget counseling session.
I had already completed my first one.
Now then. Here is where I am confused.
She told me that I am required to take this 2nd bankruptcy budget counseling session within 45 days after the date I signed my bankruptcy petition papers -- which was back on the date of August 07, 2007.
This took me by surprise. I thought that this session was supposed to be completed within 45 days after the date of my creditor's meeting -- which was today, September 12, 2007.
If what she is saying is correct, then YIKES!
I have to get this done by next week!!!
I could have sworn that I read that I had 45 days after today, September 12, 2007, which was the date of my court hearing, to get this done.
Is the substitute bankruptcy attorney, who appeared in court to represent me today, right about me having to complete this 2nd bankruptcy session within 45 days after my official filing date of August 07, 2007?
Or is it within 45 days after today, September 12, 2007, after all?
Ultimately, it makes no difference, as I have made plans to go ahead and get this done next Monday.
I am just curious as to whether my substitute attorney might be right or if she might be mistaken.
If it makes any difference, I live in the state of Virginia.
Thanks in advance.
Best Wishes,
Munch
Comment