Bankruptcy Forum

Riots in Hong Kong after heavy stock losses

BankruptPinoy
10-09-2008, 05:04 AM
There have been riots on the streets of Hong Kong following heavy losses at the city's Hang Seng index.

The Hang Seng closed over 8% lower with losses in banks, communications companies and exploration companies.

Customers are trying to get their money out of bank branches and many are protesting about losses related to the collapse of Lehman Brothers.

Earlier, trading on the stock exchange in Jakarta was halted because today's falls were so severe.

Wednesday, 8 October 2008
Story from RTÉ News:
http://www.rte.ie/news/2008/1008/hongkong.html

JRScott
10-09-2008, 05:30 AM
It might come here to the US too, they've thrown a lot of money at it and its not help much :(.

BigJohn
10-09-2008, 06:55 AM
I got a feeling we are in the Great World Depression.

JRScott
10-09-2008, 07:11 AM
Well if it is another Great Depression.

The stock market fall in 29 caused the DOW to lose 36 years worth of gains. Which if that happened today in the end we'd go back to around 1972 and the DOW would be 1000.

The good news is it only took it 22 years to recover.

chloe0724
10-09-2008, 02:37 PM
We're getting closer and closer to 1000 every day. Dropped almost 700 just today.

banca rotta
10-09-2008, 05:40 PM
I'm staying very calm. In just 3 weeks Obama will be elected and everything will be ok.:tongue:

JRScott
10-09-2008, 05:50 PM
I hope you don't really believe that :), it doesn't matter if its Obama or McCain they simply can't 'fix' this. The fix is that as Americans we have to learn to live within our means, the collapse of our banking system both in the 1870s and 1930s was caused by us trying to live beyond our means.

banca rotta
10-09-2008, 06:13 PM
I hope you don't really believe that :), it doesn't matter if its Obama or McCain they simply can't 'fix' this. The fix is that as Americans we have to learn to live within our means, the collapse of our banking system both in the 1870s and 1930s was caused by us trying to live beyond our means.


Of course not.:D There are those good but uninformed people with their favorite candidate's bumper sticker that really do believe it the way I said it.

Tbornetun
10-09-2008, 06:16 PM
lol, I wasn't going to comment when you initially said it. I thought "Whoa, I am not touching that one" I refuse to be involved in ANY political debate this election. It is not worth wasting breath on.

Pizza
10-09-2008, 09:53 PM
It's absolute panic, total chaos. People are watching their 401(k) evaporate into thin air in a matter of days; they in turn want to yank out what's left before they have nothing. Fear feeding more fear, losses feeding further losses... it's just plain scary!

JRScott
10-09-2008, 10:05 PM
Considering withdrawal penalties it might not help to withdraw the funds. It is a concern for those who were planning to retire in the next 10 years I think, if you are farther than that probably better to leave it alone and let it rebuild.

epiphany
10-10-2008, 12:25 AM
Well if it is another Great Depression.

The stock market fall in 29 caused the DOW to lose 36 years worth of gains. Which if that happened today in the end we'd go back to around 1972 and the DOW would be 1000.

The good news is it only took it 22 years to recover.

On the bright side, 1972 was a very good year. A happier time, IMO.

ep

epiphany
10-10-2008, 12:34 AM
I hope you don't really believe that :), it doesn't matter if its Obama or McCain they simply can't 'fix' this. The fix is that as Americans we have to learn to live within our means, the collapse of our banking system both in the 1870s and 1930s was caused by us trying to live beyond our means.

I never thought I would say this but I am glad I BK'd when I did. I should be discharged later this month and I have learned my lesson about living within my means.

I believe that I have aquired the tools already to get through this mess and I am grateful that the learning process will not have to take place in the upcoming age of confusion.

All I can say about that is Wow....things are getting really tough and I feel for everyone.


ep

chloe0724
10-10-2008, 02:55 AM
I am also gald I bks when I did. I just hope and pray that I keep my job.

HRx
10-10-2008, 04:16 AM
Capitalism is what caused the economy to collapse...and all the actions the government "didn't" take also perpetuated all this mess.

JRScott
10-10-2008, 04:54 AM
I would disagree capitalism isn't what has caused this problem.

What caused the problem was pretending were were a capitalist system while then having the government take a more socialist viewpoint with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The government then pressuring banks and mortgage lenders to give loans to people that the lenders knew could not afford them. Without Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac this would not have happened.

The reason the bail out package didn't work and will not work is because you have one group of bad paper bailing out another. There is not real confidence world wide in the US Governments ability to pay off its debts and meet its liabilities, thus they see the bail out as a hollow promise at best.

To restore confidence in the system the government must trim back. They must slash spending until it hurts. This means broad cuts across domestic, entitlement, and military spending.

The problem right now is we have to many folks looking for a government bail out for their errors. Contrary to Obama and McCain's rhetoric the system hasn't been fair for decades. The tax code desparately needs fixing but no one in Washington wants to fix it. For it to truly work every American must pay something into the system, without that pain folks don't pay attention to what their leaders do, and that leads us to

debtmonster
10-12-2008, 09:24 AM
Capitalism is what caused the economy to collapse...and all the actions the government "didn't" take also perpetuated all this mess.

Yep. They should put caps on what CEO's can make. I think it's nuts that people can get away with making such large salaries while all of the hard working people under them get paid squat. I hate Capitalism. But everything I've ever heard or read about says socialism and communism don't work and to look how it has failed miserably in other countries.

I believe in Capitalism, I just don't believe in a CEO making $100 million per year while the hard working people under him were only making $30-70k. That wealth should be spread out. The $100 million should be capped to like $2 million while the other $80 million is spread to those employees at the bottom for doing all the work.

I know life isn't fair... but it should be

epiphany
10-17-2008, 01:22 AM
Capitalism is what caused the economy to collapse...and all the actions the government "didn't" take also perpetuated all this mess.

I actually think capitalism can be a very good thing. But what becomes a problem is capitalism unchecked.

JRS wrote:
What caused the problem was pretending were were a capitalist system while then having the government take a more socialist viewpoint with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The government then pressuring banks and mortgage lenders to give loans to people that the lenders knew could not afford them. Without Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac this would not have happened.

Sure that got the ball rolling but did all other lenders have to jump on the band wagon and lessen lending restrictions too? Loans that were repeatedly being denied by loan agents were being pushed through by higher ups in the company in order to make that almighty buck.

The reason the bail out package didn't work and will not work is because you have one group of bad paper bailing out another. There is not real confidence world wide in the US Governments ability to pay off its debts and meet its liabilities, thus they see the bail out as a hollow promise at best.

Well, I sure agree with that. We don't have any confidence, why would anyone else? And I don't for the life of me know how they are going to figure out what exactly they are buying from the financial institutions. Many loans were farmed out/sold in pieces to investors both here and abroad. How they heck are they going to sort that out?

To restore confidence in the system the government must trim back. They must slash spending until it hurts. This means broad cuts across domestic, entitlement, and military spending.

I agree with this too but just don't see it happening. How's that for confidence?

The problem right now is we have to many folks looking for a government bail out for their errors. Contrary to Obama and McCain's rhetoric the system hasn't been fair for decades. The tax code desparately needs fixing but no one in Washington wants to fix it. For it to truly work every American must pay something into the system, without that pain folks don't pay attention to what their leaders do, and that leads us to

I agree that if everyone had a stake more people would pay attention. But it's not realistic to think that you are ever going to get enough people to pay such attention that is makes a difference just due to plain old fashioned human nature so unfortunately I don't see this ever happening. Especially not right now when government officials are just trying to figure out which public freebies will be most effective at keeping them in office.


What an unsettling time.

ep

JRScott
10-17-2008, 02:22 AM
You'll never get everyone to pay attention but I do believe a majority of Americans would pay attention if they had to pay a minimum of 10% of their income. Reagan once said "10 percent no more, that's what God asks and who are we to ask for more."

Yes it would be painful, but the fact we have so many not paying any taxes is why we have a government running amok.

As for why the other banks followed Fannie and Freddie, they were pressured to do so by Senator Dodd, Rep. Frank, and organizations such as ACORN. They were threatened with sanctions and the inability to do mergers if they failed to give out a certain amount of sub prime loans.

In order to just balance the Federal Budget you'd need to increase revenue stream by between 40-50%. The alternative is slashing spending by around 30%. The problem is no matter what you charge for the income tax, the revenue stream remains at a nearly constant % of the GDP. High income taxes lead to a lower GDP, lower income taxes lead to a higher GDP.