We were supposed to be confirmed this morning. Per Pacer, we weren't. Trustee's objections have been resolved, but... here's atty's response....
The plan was not confirmed because we are still arguing with your husband's ex-wife's attorney regarding the debt that the divorce decree obligated him to pay. Thus, we requested that the matter be adjourned so that we could try to settle the issue.
From my research and from our atty's comments early, early on, we went with a 13 because the stuff in the divorce decree was supposedly not support. It was simply dividing of debt.
It would have seemed to me that if the judge felt the law was on our side, why she didn't just confirm the plan. Since she didn't confirm, it makes me think maybe there is more wiggle room than we were first led to believe. Which if that's the case, why are we in a 13? To save our house (we were behind a bit)? I'd be just as happy to walk away from this money pit we call home.
Sorry to ramble... hoping someone on here has been there, done that...
The plan was not confirmed because we are still arguing with your husband's ex-wife's attorney regarding the debt that the divorce decree obligated him to pay. Thus, we requested that the matter be adjourned so that we could try to settle the issue.
From my research and from our atty's comments early, early on, we went with a 13 because the stuff in the divorce decree was supposedly not support. It was simply dividing of debt.
It would have seemed to me that if the judge felt the law was on our side, why she didn't just confirm the plan. Since she didn't confirm, it makes me think maybe there is more wiggle room than we were first led to believe. Which if that's the case, why are we in a 13? To save our house (we were behind a bit)? I'd be just as happy to walk away from this money pit we call home.
Sorry to ramble... hoping someone on here has been there, done that...