top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Citi in talks over bigger U.S. stake - report

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Citi in talks over bigger U.S. stake - report

    February 23, 2009

    Citigroup Inc. is in discussions with regulators about a plan for the federal government to take a larger ownership stake in the bank, according to published reports.

    The Wall Street Journal, citing sources familiar with the matter, reported that the government would convert a large portion of its preferred Citigroup shares to common shares.

    The government received the preferred shares in return for investing $45 billion in Citi as part of the $700 billion bailout of the financial system.

    According to the Journal, the talks involve Citi executives and regulators at the Federal Reserve and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency. Officials in the Obama administration have not said whether they support the plan, the Journal reported.

    Citigroup spokesman Michael Hanretta declined to comment on the Journal report. On Friday, the bank issued a statement saying that its capital base is "very strong" and capital reserves were among the highest in the industry at the end of the fourth quarter.

    "We continue to focus and make progress on reducing the assets on our balance sheet, reducing expenses and streamlining our business for future profitable growth," Hanretta said.

    The Treasury Department, which has spearheaded recovery efforts for the financial system, declined to comment on the report, noting it has a policy of not discussing conversations with specific banks.

    Yet the department noted that it was open to allowing financial institutions to covert government's existing preferred shares into new convertible preferred stock - a move that would ultimately allow Citigroup to strengthen its capital levels.

    In many ways, that is exactly what government officials are reportedly considering, according to the Journal.

    "We've made clear that we will do what is necessary to strengthen and stabilize the financial system so that it can provide the credit necessary to support economic recovery," Treasury spokesman Isaac Baker said in a statement to CNN.

    The report is sure to stoke speculation about whether the Obama administration may have to nationalize large banks to stabilize the financial system.

    The question of nationalization has weighed on the minds of investors in the two weeks since Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner announced a comprehensive stability plan that fell flat.

    The issue came to a head Friday when nationalization fears helped drag down shares of Citi (C, Fortune 500) and Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) as much as 36% at one point.

    BofA recovered most of its losses to finish down just 3.6%. But Citi's stock closed with a 22% loss.

    The Obama administration has said it wants to keep the banking system in private hands, which seems to suggest it isn't aiming to run the likes of Citi and BofA. But that leaves the door open to an "intervention" -- a takeover of a troubled bank for the purpose of breaking it up, bringing in new capital and finding new owners and management.

    The term nationalization has been used to cover a range of very different outcomes. Most obviously, it refers to the outright takeover of troubled firms, such as when the Treasury Department put mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) into conservatorship.

    But it has also been used by some people to cover sizable investments that give government officials considerable say in a firm's activities -- such as the loan guarantees extended in recent months to Citi and BofA.

    -CNN's Alona Rivord contributed to this report. To top of page
    First Published: February 22, 2009: 9:43 PM ET

    Last edited by laz; 02-23-2009, 01:37 PM. Reason: dear shabam, please follow news article posting guidelines
    My comments are solely based on my opinion. The information and links that I have
    posted are provided solely for informational purposes, and do not constitute legal advice

    #2
    Can you believe these guys? Then we read in other threads that they are literally suing anyone behind on a loan 30 days on the dot.
    My comments are solely based on my opinion. The information and links that I have
    posted are provided solely for informational purposes, and do not constitute legal advice

    Comment


      #3
      Bad idea really, we can't keep rewarding bad behavior as we have. Let them file Chapter 11 and restructure, in the long run its the best for everyone.
      May 31st, 2007: Petition Filed by my lawyer
      July 2nd, 2007: 341 Meeting Held
      September 4th, 2007: Discharged and Closed.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by JRScott View Post
        Bad idea really, we can't keep rewarding bad behavior as we have. Let them file Chapter 11 and restructure, in the long run its the best for everyone.

        Yep, there just comes a point where enough is enough. There just isn't enough money on earth to fix some of these companies.I don't see how GM and Chrysler are going to be able to avoid a trip to the courthouse.

        Comment

        bottom Ad Widget

        Collapse
        Working...
        X