I just wrote this as part of a response to a different post, but wanted to pose my question separately.
I was surprised when I asked a lawyer about future income increases while filing for Ch 7. My income for the 6-month pre-filing period is about $34k. Now that my job has changed from contractor to fulltime, my current income is $38K (which is still below the state median income). Although I love my job, the 3 hour commute is long (and expensive with gas) so I've always got one eye open for something closer, and, of course, with better pay. I used to make around $55K, but haven't been able to do the same since layoffs.
I asked the lawyer what would happen if i got back to my old salary--this would be about a 50% increase from my current income--after I had filed. He said IT DIDN'T MATTER!!!
You know, although I like the answer, I just don't think it makes sense since it isn't in the spirit of the way the BK laws were written. I would think that if I got to the 341 meeting and the trustee asks "Do you anticipate any changes in income?" and I said I have a new job starting in two weeks at $55K, I would think that I'd have to go to Ch 13 and be in a repayment plan.
Can someone explain the logic that I am NOT seeing? (Or at least point out in the law what I'm not understanding.)
I was surprised when I asked a lawyer about future income increases while filing for Ch 7. My income for the 6-month pre-filing period is about $34k. Now that my job has changed from contractor to fulltime, my current income is $38K (which is still below the state median income). Although I love my job, the 3 hour commute is long (and expensive with gas) so I've always got one eye open for something closer, and, of course, with better pay. I used to make around $55K, but haven't been able to do the same since layoffs.
I asked the lawyer what would happen if i got back to my old salary--this would be about a 50% increase from my current income--after I had filed. He said IT DIDN'T MATTER!!!
You know, although I like the answer, I just don't think it makes sense since it isn't in the spirit of the way the BK laws were written. I would think that if I got to the 341 meeting and the trustee asks "Do you anticipate any changes in income?" and I said I have a new job starting in two weeks at $55K, I would think that I'd have to go to Ch 13 and be in a repayment plan.
Can someone explain the logic that I am NOT seeing? (Or at least point out in the law what I'm not understanding.)
Comment