top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

can I do this?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    can I do this?

    My lawyer had sent me papers to sign, either to check if we wanted him to represent us in the raffirmations papers for our car, 3 choices, we do it ourselves(court) he signs for $450 or it may cost hourly if it goes to a judge. They asked us to come in fri to choose one, they said either we reaffirm or amend to surrender.(i know they will not write on to keep and pay).
    so maybe I should cancel apt... fill in papers to lawyer we will sort out the reffirmation ourselves.
    then contact Capital one and say.. not happy with your papers , lower interest rate and send new papers, Then if we just neglect to fill in and send papers within the 60days then what??
    Nothing right....? Can i get in trouble with the lawyers/courts for saying on petition I will reaffirm but then not doing it??
    as soon as the 60 days are up I intend to just ride through and pay a week early every month as long as i want the car...
    can I do this??
    B x
    filed Ch 7 Oct 31st 2008.
    341 Dec 10th 2008.
    DiSCHARGED Feb 10th 2009

    #2
    Simply, if you're represented by an attorney, you can only do the re-affirmation through the attorney.

    This is because all re-affirmations go through the judge and if an attorney doesn't concur, then it won't happen. You can't circumvent the attorney without firing them first and motioning to proceed in pro per.

    Now, you're talking about "dragging" your feet. There have been cases where a debtor stated that they were re-affirming on their Statement of Intentions and later, never even filling out the re-affirmation agreement. The creditor sued in an Adversarial Proceeding (AP) stating that the debtor intent is what prevails. This was because the debtor tried to surrender the cars later and claim the debt was satisfied because they never re-affirmed.

    The court agreed in several of those cases. It is how you act. If you actually attempted to re-affirm, and a judge even denies it, but you did all the paperwork and turned it in... most caselaw suggest that the reaffirmation is indeed good. Even with the judge dissenting. (So long as you continue to pay.)

    So, it may work in your case, to arbitrarily delay the process.

    I don't know, but offered up my opinion for the sake of it.
    Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
    Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
    Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

    Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

    Comment


      #3
      what if I

      turn the paperwork in on day 40 say I send it back to the lender, and I believe they have to file with the courts... so i can do the reaf pro se, then will it delay my discharge or my closing date until the hearing has been held?

      I have heard of so many ppl on here just not signing or sending in the paperwork and thought it was voluntary...

      Thanks
      B x
      filed Ch 7 Oct 31st 2008.
      341 Dec 10th 2008.
      DiSCHARGED Feb 10th 2009

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by B65 View Post
        turn the paperwork in on day 40 say I send it back to the lender, and I believe they have to file with the courts... so i can do the reaf pro se, then will it delay my discharge or my closing date until the hearing has been held?
        Assuming you are talking about reaffirmation....

        If you file pro se and wish to file a reaffirmation for an asset loan, then the judge will schedule a mandatory hearing to review your proposed reaffirmation. This is to protect you from signing your life away because you didn't understand the terms and implications of the reaffirmation.

        I have heard of so many ppl on here just not signing or sending in the paperwork and thought it was voluntary...
        The bk law states that you have three choices about what to do with your secured assets when you file - reaffirm, redeem, or surrender.

        When the current bk law passed in 2005, there was a lot of confusion whether a "ride through" still existed (if you kept a secured asset without reaffirming and kept on making payments on time, the lender would not repossess).

        Since 2005, case law decisions have been made by judges in some districts that make trying a ride-through more risky. Other districts still look the other way and let the dice roll between the filer and the creditor.

        A few states (Kansas is one of them) have separate credit legislation forbidding lenders to repossess an asset if payments are current.

        Bottom line - it's a crazy quilt. Only an experienced bk lawyer is going to know which way the "reaffirm or not" winds are blowing where you are.
        I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.

        06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
        06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
        07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
        10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
        01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
        09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
        06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
        08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !

        10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
        Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go

        Comment


          #5
          Am I to read this that your lawyer wants an additional $450 to sign the reaffirmation papers?

          That sounds insane to me! Our lawyer handled the reaffirmation that we did on our house (one mortgage) as part of the bankruptcy. That way, you do not have to go before the judge. I can not imagine a lawyer wanting more money for that simple act, or that he would not have included it with his fees. It takes him all of, what, four tenths of an hour tops?
          Filed 8/08 - Discharged 11/08! Not tracking FICO.
          Pre-Bankruptcy Net Worth: -$72,000... Today's net worth: $142,000.
          If your FICO score just went higher than your net worth, and you are happy about this, you might have a financial problem!

          Comment


            #6
            yes

            he wants more money to sign but he wont say he will sign he then wants you to sign saying if he does not want to sign you then have to pay $350 more an hour to go infront of a judge.

            so from what i am reading in my state I may not have choice other than reaffirm or surrender so i can do it pro se but i do not know if it will extend my discharge date or closing date if it is later within the 60days.
            B x
            filed Ch 7 Oct 31st 2008.
            341 Dec 10th 2008.
            DiSCHARGED Feb 10th 2009

            Comment


              #7
              Many lawyers charge additional fees when it comes to re-affirmations and adversarial proceedings. The reason is, that their standard fee (or flat fee), usually only includes the 341 and the confirmation hearings.

              Even in States where the Courts have mandated "no look" fees... the lawyer is still free to charge for things "outside the box".
              Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
              Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
              Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

              Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

              Comment

              bottom Ad Widget

              Collapse
              Working...
              X