top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Question about reaffirmation

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Question about reaffirmation

    I have a first mtg with Countrywide and alease with Toyota. Never missed a payment on the two and want to keep them can I reaffirm those 2 accounts when I file chapter 7?

    How and what does the reaffirmation process mean?

    #2
    Originally posted by halloweendmb1 View Post
    I have a first mtg with Countrywide and alease with Toyota. Never missed a payment on the two and want to keep them can I reaffirm those 2 accounts when I file chapter 7?
    Depending on your state's exemptions, you may be able to keep both and not reaffirm. Solid legal counsel can help you sort out what the best options are for your situation.

    How and what does the reaffirmation process mean?
    Here are resources that explain what reaffirmation is and how to decide what to do when you file bk:



    Do a search for reaffirmation here in the forum. There have been several lengthy discussions about whether it makes sense to reaffirm when you can make payments on time. If you reaffirm and something happens so you can't make payments, then you are responsible for the debt. If you don't reaffirm, then you walk away debt-free.
    I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.

    06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
    06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
    07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
    10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
    01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
    09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
    06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
    08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !

    10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
    Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go

    Comment


      #3
      does Countrywide reaffirm on house payment when you have always been current. I have never missed my house payment or car payment?

      Comment


        #4
        As far as the leased vehicle, I too had leased a vehicle and they allowed me to keep it as long as I continued to make the payments which I had always done(never missed one)but instead of a reaffirmation, GM told me that they require a Lease Assumption statement to be signed by me in Illinois. I,m not sure if they have the same thing where you are, but I never signed a lease reaffirmation agreement.

        Comment


          #5
          Some lenders are still allowing what is called a "ride through". This is when the debtor continues to make the payments, but no reaffirmation is completed. This was allowed under the old BK law (prior to Oct. 15, 2005), but the new law is the debtor must state their intentions when they file. Anyways, not doing a reaffirmation is what many attorneys are instructing their clients because without a reaffirmation, the debtor can surrender the property (houses and cars) at any time after the discharge and the debtor is not responsible for the deficency balance.
          Bankruptcy History:
          Chapter 7 filed - 10/12/2005 - Asset
          Discharged - 02/16/2006
          Case Closed - 11/08/2007

          A banker is a fellow who lends you his umbrella when the sun is shining and wants it back the minute it begins to rain ~ Mark Twain

          All suggestions are based on personal experience and research and SHOULD NOT be construed as legal advice as I am NOT an attorney. Always consult with competent counsel in your area with regards to your particular situation.

          Comment


            #6
            Originally posted by BassBoy View Post
            Some lenders are still allowing what is called a "ride through". ... This was allowed under the old BK law (prior to Oct. 15, 2005)...
            Ride-throughs are still allowed in Ch 13 under the current bk law, but only when the car was purchased more than 910 days before filing.

            Several recent case law decisions around the 910-day "hanging paragraph" are attempting to clarify exactly how to interpret this poorly written part of the current bk law:

            Earlier, we discussed here several recent decisions on BAPCPA amendments to 11 U.S.C. 1325(a) dealing with the treatment of purchase-money a...
            I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.

            06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
            06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
            07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
            10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
            01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
            09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
            06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
            08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !

            10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
            Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go

            Comment

            bottom Ad Widget

            Collapse
            Working...
            X