top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The "910 Vehicle"
Collapse
X
-
The "910 Vehicle"
Filed Ch 7 - 09/06
Discharged - 12/2006
Officially Declared No Asset - 03/2007
Closed - 04/2007
I am not an attorney. My comments are based on personal experience and research. Always consult an attorney in your area to address concerns related to your particular situation.
Another good thing about being poor is that when you are seventy your children will not have declared you legally insane in order to gain control of your estate. - Woody Allen...Tags: None
-
Evidently, different Courts are interpreting the Law different ways.
The NACBA is taking on the issue of the "hanging paragraph".
http://www.nacba.com/
Surrender In Full Satisfaction?
NACBA has filed an amicus brief in In re White (WDNC) which argues that 1) 910 creditors do not have "allowed secured claims" entitled to treatment under 1325(a)(5), and 2) if those creditors do have "allowed secured claims" in the full amount of the debt, then 1325(a)(5)(C) permits debtors to surrender in full satisfaction of that debt.Filed Ch 7 - 09/06
Discharged - 12/2006
Officially Declared No Asset - 03/2007
Closed - 04/2007
I am not an attorney. My comments are based on personal experience and research. Always consult an attorney in your area to address concerns related to your particular situation.
Another good thing about being poor is that when you are seventy your children will not have declared you legally insane in order to gain control of your estate. - Woody Allen...
Comment
-
It seems all the courts do things a lil different according to their interpretation of the new law. Its a shamed we have such unclear as it seems to affect us all differently vs us all being treated equal.Filed chapter 13 January 31, 2007
Waited and worried Febuary 1, 2007 - April 19, 2007
Confirmed April 20, 2007
Comment
-
I know...wasn't that the whole point of having uniform bankruptcy laws throughout the country?DISCLAIMER: I am not an attorney. My posts are not legal advice. They are for information only. Please feel free to use them in an academic sense, as I simply wish to share with you what I have learned/researched.
Comment
-
As long as bankruptcy law has been interpreted by the courts, there have been differences between districts. This is nothing new.Originally posted by bige1030 View PostI know...wasn't that the whole point of having uniform bankruptcy laws throughout the country?
However, BAPCPA, in its zeal to try to remove the ability of local district judges to make decisions about bk cases on an individual basis, has created a real quagmire. We are just seeing the tip of the iceberg of case law trying to sort out the many 'black holes' in this bad law. BAPCPA is a perfect example of what happens when the very people who will benefit from a law are allowed to write it themselves without any outside input, and when sound advice about the badness of a law from bankruptcy experts and stakeholders around the country is ignored and our Congress passes it anyway.I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.
06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !
10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Comment