On my Statement of Intentions, my attorney marked "surrender" for our RV. However, our true intent is to continue to make payments and not reaffirm, if the bank will allow that. The attorney said some do, some don't.
So today I checked PACER and I see that the bank filed a motion for relief from the automatic stay, based on the grounds of "depreciating value" from debotor's use. It even says that I'm completely currently on my payments. So should I take this as in indication that the bank won't allow a ride-through? Or is this standard operating procedure, regardless of what they'll let me do?
I definately don't want to reaff a luxury item like an RV, even though the payment is small (it's not a huge motorhome, just a little trailer). But I was hoping they'd let me keep it, as long as I made all the payments.
PS - I know that the New Law did away with ride-throughs, but I also know that it still happens. I was hoping for the latter.
So today I checked PACER and I see that the bank filed a motion for relief from the automatic stay, based on the grounds of "depreciating value" from debotor's use. It even says that I'm completely currently on my payments. So should I take this as in indication that the bank won't allow a ride-through? Or is this standard operating procedure, regardless of what they'll let me do?
I definately don't want to reaff a luxury item like an RV, even though the payment is small (it's not a huge motorhome, just a little trailer). But I was hoping they'd let me keep it, as long as I made all the payments.
PS - I know that the New Law did away with ride-throughs, but I also know that it still happens. I was hoping for the latter.

Concluded no asset 10/17/07 



Comment