I've talked to 4 attorneys about this issue, and have 4 different answers--don't know who is closest to being right. The question we MUST have answered before risking a Chapter 7 filing is how the trustee might look at the 2 of us renting a "big" house when we could be in something smaller or an apartment---and thus would use that as an excuse to disallow that "extra" rent we pay as disposable income that should be available for creditors.
The rent we pay for a house is high, but NOT because it is a super-duper house, but because it is bigger than the 2 of us really need (no kids). It is 2,100 square feet, 4 BR (3 of them really small though)....decent house in a decent neighborhood...that's it. We COULD be comfortable in a smaller house or an apartment, but NOBODY will even talk to us because of our bad credit. Two years ago when we rented this place, EVEN THEN we had to pay 6 months in advance. This is all because we live in the WHITE-WHITE-HOT real estate area known as Orange County, CA. It is so hot, nobody has to take a risk on a credit problem tenant. I've called dozens of aprtments and individuals over the last month, and every one of them has said, "don't waste your time applying". It's that bad. We are stuck in this "more than we really need" place. The only place we could get now, with our credit status, would be a 900 square feet 60-year old rat's nest in crack-town.
One attorney says they have to take us as we are--not as we "could be". Another says that it would pass muster because we have been here 2 years---that it's not some slick move to "play" the system, such as moving FROM a cheaper apartment to this bigger pricier place 2 months ago, and then filing for BK. Another says he thinks it will be a problem.
All these lawyers are specialists in BK (small firms, not big BK mills), charge higher fees than most, so not just the cheap-o slam-dunk type guys (presumably), claim to know the BK customs in the district, are familiar with the BK judges, know some trustees, etc. So WHY so much difference in opinions??
Please, can you guys weigh in on this, and helpe me develop an opinion? Do you think the trustees, in general, want to make an issue out of where THEY think you shold live, and how much THEY think you should pay? And if it doesn't match their idea, then they just disallow the rental expesnse.....I know the NEW laws will dictate that situation, using the IRS' laughable "guidelines", but that is not the way it is now to my knowledge.
The rent we pay for a house is high, but NOT because it is a super-duper house, but because it is bigger than the 2 of us really need (no kids). It is 2,100 square feet, 4 BR (3 of them really small though)....decent house in a decent neighborhood...that's it. We COULD be comfortable in a smaller house or an apartment, but NOBODY will even talk to us because of our bad credit. Two years ago when we rented this place, EVEN THEN we had to pay 6 months in advance. This is all because we live in the WHITE-WHITE-HOT real estate area known as Orange County, CA. It is so hot, nobody has to take a risk on a credit problem tenant. I've called dozens of aprtments and individuals over the last month, and every one of them has said, "don't waste your time applying". It's that bad. We are stuck in this "more than we really need" place. The only place we could get now, with our credit status, would be a 900 square feet 60-year old rat's nest in crack-town.
One attorney says they have to take us as we are--not as we "could be". Another says that it would pass muster because we have been here 2 years---that it's not some slick move to "play" the system, such as moving FROM a cheaper apartment to this bigger pricier place 2 months ago, and then filing for BK. Another says he thinks it will be a problem.
All these lawyers are specialists in BK (small firms, not big BK mills), charge higher fees than most, so not just the cheap-o slam-dunk type guys (presumably), claim to know the BK customs in the district, are familiar with the BK judges, know some trustees, etc. So WHY so much difference in opinions??
Please, can you guys weigh in on this, and helpe me develop an opinion? Do you think the trustees, in general, want to make an issue out of where THEY think you shold live, and how much THEY think you should pay? And if it doesn't match their idea, then they just disallow the rental expesnse.....I know the NEW laws will dictate that situation, using the IRS' laughable "guidelines", but that is not the way it is now to my knowledge.
Comment