I thought I would make a post here related to debt validation and C&D phone calls.
Every collection agency I have ever requested debt validation from has never validated any debt, especially if the original creditor was a national or regional company. In addition, my state laws (OR) refer to original creditors as well as CA's.
I also requested that the agency not contact me except in writing. Now, these are not extremely large debts, and a couple of months of garnishment would take care of them, but still I do not hear from these folks.
One of the things I've learned should it come to a small claim ($7500 or less in Oregon) is that you should always deny the claim against you and request a hearing. Why? Well, its cheap ($45.00) and it takes 4 - 8 weeks to schedule a mediation hearing. I'd always taken the stand that if you owe the debt, then there is no reason to deny it. It turns out that in the majority of counties here, denying the claim leads to automatic mediation that gets scheduled weeks in the future. In addition, one has the right to request a re-scheduled hearing date if the request is received at least 7 days in advance (I'm speaking of my county, here.) This can add another 4 - 8 weeks!
Since I've never received a return on a request for a DV, I'm wondering if there is some giant IT info center out there that tracks your name and account numbers that state you requested a DV. As such, no one wants to take on an assigned account from an OC. Or, do you go to the bottom of the pile until someone is ready to sue you? I still have many un-settled accounts, but I seldom hear from these folks. I don't get it.
I have several postponed small claims issues that will not come to hearing for another several weeks. I'll let you know how these eventually turn out. I do have to wonder if the CA will even show up for the hearing (the first scheduled hearing is for $580.) There are no attorney fees allowed to be added on in small claims in Oregon. There are "prevailing party fees," whatever the h*ll those are, but it appears that they seldom exceed $85.00 from records of the court I can access. So, why on earth would a local CA bother to file a claim on $580? I think the answer is clear. Most folks simply allow the default judgment and this requires no additional time or effort from the CA. All they need is a court clerk's stamp for acknowledgment of a default judgment, and they can quickly move to garnishment.
I've recently learned that should I have a credit card account where I have been sued in a larger circuit court, it is in my best interest to request the case be removed to small claims, if the claim is under $7500. My understanding is that this costs me nothing, other than stamps required to mail my request to the creditor or CA along with my request to the circuit court.
In summary, if you are trying to buy yourself time, there is nothing to be lost by DV'ing, requesting the CA/OC cease and desist, and answering every civil summons you receive. It does seem to set all parties back a notch or two. In particular, it appears that debt-related small claims cases and larger amounts in circuit court cases are beginning to grind things to a turtle's pace. Not responding appears to lead to quick judgment, while any response at all appears to set things back a bit. Just my experience, and I would love to hear others.
If you know you owe the debt, and you know folks will come after you, then what do you have to lose while exercising what "you believe are your civil rights?" In a worse-case scenario you have the sword of bankruptcy, chapter 7 or 13.
Keep in mind that running late on payments for months may be more painful to your credit than an immediate filing for BK, but if your credit is secondary, exercise your rights if you can afford to. Request validation of debt, and request that you are only contacted via USPS mail. The result is that you may get sued immediately, but this itself does not imply immediate action can be taken against you. Communicate, communicate, communicate...
The law and courts appear to be neutral until a case actually appears for hearing or trial.
My humble opinion and interpretation of things.
Every collection agency I have ever requested debt validation from has never validated any debt, especially if the original creditor was a national or regional company. In addition, my state laws (OR) refer to original creditors as well as CA's.
I also requested that the agency not contact me except in writing. Now, these are not extremely large debts, and a couple of months of garnishment would take care of them, but still I do not hear from these folks.
One of the things I've learned should it come to a small claim ($7500 or less in Oregon) is that you should always deny the claim against you and request a hearing. Why? Well, its cheap ($45.00) and it takes 4 - 8 weeks to schedule a mediation hearing. I'd always taken the stand that if you owe the debt, then there is no reason to deny it. It turns out that in the majority of counties here, denying the claim leads to automatic mediation that gets scheduled weeks in the future. In addition, one has the right to request a re-scheduled hearing date if the request is received at least 7 days in advance (I'm speaking of my county, here.) This can add another 4 - 8 weeks!
Since I've never received a return on a request for a DV, I'm wondering if there is some giant IT info center out there that tracks your name and account numbers that state you requested a DV. As such, no one wants to take on an assigned account from an OC. Or, do you go to the bottom of the pile until someone is ready to sue you? I still have many un-settled accounts, but I seldom hear from these folks. I don't get it.
I have several postponed small claims issues that will not come to hearing for another several weeks. I'll let you know how these eventually turn out. I do have to wonder if the CA will even show up for the hearing (the first scheduled hearing is for $580.) There are no attorney fees allowed to be added on in small claims in Oregon. There are "prevailing party fees," whatever the h*ll those are, but it appears that they seldom exceed $85.00 from records of the court I can access. So, why on earth would a local CA bother to file a claim on $580? I think the answer is clear. Most folks simply allow the default judgment and this requires no additional time or effort from the CA. All they need is a court clerk's stamp for acknowledgment of a default judgment, and they can quickly move to garnishment.
I've recently learned that should I have a credit card account where I have been sued in a larger circuit court, it is in my best interest to request the case be removed to small claims, if the claim is under $7500. My understanding is that this costs me nothing, other than stamps required to mail my request to the creditor or CA along with my request to the circuit court.
In summary, if you are trying to buy yourself time, there is nothing to be lost by DV'ing, requesting the CA/OC cease and desist, and answering every civil summons you receive. It does seem to set all parties back a notch or two. In particular, it appears that debt-related small claims cases and larger amounts in circuit court cases are beginning to grind things to a turtle's pace. Not responding appears to lead to quick judgment, while any response at all appears to set things back a bit. Just my experience, and I would love to hear others.
If you know you owe the debt, and you know folks will come after you, then what do you have to lose while exercising what "you believe are your civil rights?" In a worse-case scenario you have the sword of bankruptcy, chapter 7 or 13.
Keep in mind that running late on payments for months may be more painful to your credit than an immediate filing for BK, but if your credit is secondary, exercise your rights if you can afford to. Request validation of debt, and request that you are only contacted via USPS mail. The result is that you may get sued immediately, but this itself does not imply immediate action can be taken against you. Communicate, communicate, communicate...
The law and courts appear to be neutral until a case actually appears for hearing or trial.
My humble opinion and interpretation of things.

In addition, simply doing nothing is not always the best course of action. Each situation is quite different, and only the parties involved can measure the risk of their actions.
Comment