There was a motion from the UST to extend time for the 60 days to reflect 60 days from my ammended 341 date. I didn't object as that seemed fair to me.
No one showed at my 341 (creditors) The hearing for the time extension was on 4/9 so I checked PACER and as I figured it was granted. I saw on the minute order that the UST attorney appeared as did the person who sued me in small claims. I thought that was an odd thing for her to show up for that but she is frequently out of the country so she probably showed up to the only thing she was in town for.
This creditor was once a good friend, someone who I thought was like a Mother to me. Turns out she is just like my mother, as I haven't spoken to my own in years because she a mean drunk who likes to hurt people. She sued me in small claims after a series of bad events in my life. I was too tired to fight anymore, knew I was on the verge of bankruptcy and couldn't take anymore time off from work to appear so she won by default. It wasn't about a loan or any money that was owed to her it was an emotional distress lawsuit. When she had the Sheriff order a wage garnishment of 25% that was when I filed for bankruptcy.
Does she have grounds to object and throw a wrench into my already off kilter bankruptcy? I have no assets at all. Nada. My car according to KBB is worth $100. No savings, no 401k, no electronics that are less than 5 years old. I never owed her actual money, didn't commit a criminal act or fraud, she sued on this emotional distress and got a default judgment. I'm sure she played the weak and confused old lady routine on the UST attorney and asked her a multitude of questions about my case.
Do you have to have a legit legal reason to object or can anyone object and be heard without a legitimate reason (ie, fraud, hidden assets)?
I thought I was pretty safe from her now since I never received goods, money or services from this debt but now I'm not so sure.
No one showed at my 341 (creditors) The hearing for the time extension was on 4/9 so I checked PACER and as I figured it was granted. I saw on the minute order that the UST attorney appeared as did the person who sued me in small claims. I thought that was an odd thing for her to show up for that but she is frequently out of the country so she probably showed up to the only thing she was in town for.
This creditor was once a good friend, someone who I thought was like a Mother to me. Turns out she is just like my mother, as I haven't spoken to my own in years because she a mean drunk who likes to hurt people. She sued me in small claims after a series of bad events in my life. I was too tired to fight anymore, knew I was on the verge of bankruptcy and couldn't take anymore time off from work to appear so she won by default. It wasn't about a loan or any money that was owed to her it was an emotional distress lawsuit. When she had the Sheriff order a wage garnishment of 25% that was when I filed for bankruptcy.
Does she have grounds to object and throw a wrench into my already off kilter bankruptcy? I have no assets at all. Nada. My car according to KBB is worth $100. No savings, no 401k, no electronics that are less than 5 years old. I never owed her actual money, didn't commit a criminal act or fraud, she sued on this emotional distress and got a default judgment. I'm sure she played the weak and confused old lady routine on the UST attorney and asked her a multitude of questions about my case.
Do you have to have a legit legal reason to object or can anyone object and be heard without a legitimate reason (ie, fraud, hidden assets)?
I thought I was pretty safe from her now since I never received goods, money or services from this debt but now I'm not so sure.

Comment