I found this site in one of the threads here, I don't remember which one: http://freemeanstesting.com/zmt/Mt_intro.asp
It leads me to believe that if you are below the median income of your state, you do NOT have to take a means test, or more accurately, you do not have to take the rest of the means test. Here is what I'm referring to:
"The means test provides three benchmarks, the passing of any one of which is satisfactory. In other words, you need to meet only one of three criteria.
The first criterion compares your income to the median income for your area. If you meet this criterion, you pass the test and need not complete the rest."
This seems to contradict most of what I've read on the forums, that you have to take the means test to see how much disposable income you have left over. Where am I getting confused?
It leads me to believe that if you are below the median income of your state, you do NOT have to take a means test, or more accurately, you do not have to take the rest of the means test. Here is what I'm referring to:
"The means test provides three benchmarks, the passing of any one of which is satisfactory. In other words, you need to meet only one of three criteria.
The first criterion compares your income to the median income for your area. If you meet this criterion, you pass the test and need not complete the rest."
This seems to contradict most of what I've read on the forums, that you have to take the means test to see how much disposable income you have left over. Where am I getting confused?
Comment