Our plan was confirmed mid October after details were hashed out with Ford and a cram down we did. Payments have been made, ACH transfer has been arranged. We’re ready to go through the next 5 years.
Today we get a motion for a relief from automatic stay from Toyota dated November 20th. Huh? We surrendered the leased car in August, and that surrender is noted on the claim form submitted by Toyota in August. The original claim, and the claim that is part of the plan is for $11,000. The payoff at the time of surrender was $16,200—so we are assuming that Toyota calculated they would get about 5k in auction of the car. The 11k made sense.
The documents received yesterday indicated that we have not made post-confirmation payments as per the plan, with the plan attached. No where in the plan is there a provision for payments to Toyota. It is noted that the car would be surrendered, which it was.
The new amount that Toyota is asking for outside of the plan is for 2 payments of $400 and a lump sum of about $8500, right around $9,000.
Also in the documents received was an affidavit by an asset protection agent of Toyota stating that she has knowledge that my stepdaughter (who was a co-signer only on the lease) has possession of and is driving the car in question. Now if that’s true, how did she get the car back—she was unemployed after the car was turned in, we were never notified by Toyota—nor was there an amendment or objection filed prior to the confirmation hearing, my sd is living with her mom, and my husband has been driving her to and from work as needed.
I sent an email to our attorney to let her know that to our knowledge sd has not had possession after the car after we turned it in, and currently does not have a vehicle.
So many contradictions in the document…..
Any thoughts?
Today we get a motion for a relief from automatic stay from Toyota dated November 20th. Huh? We surrendered the leased car in August, and that surrender is noted on the claim form submitted by Toyota in August. The original claim, and the claim that is part of the plan is for $11,000. The payoff at the time of surrender was $16,200—so we are assuming that Toyota calculated they would get about 5k in auction of the car. The 11k made sense.
The documents received yesterday indicated that we have not made post-confirmation payments as per the plan, with the plan attached. No where in the plan is there a provision for payments to Toyota. It is noted that the car would be surrendered, which it was.
The new amount that Toyota is asking for outside of the plan is for 2 payments of $400 and a lump sum of about $8500, right around $9,000.
Also in the documents received was an affidavit by an asset protection agent of Toyota stating that she has knowledge that my stepdaughter (who was a co-signer only on the lease) has possession of and is driving the car in question. Now if that’s true, how did she get the car back—she was unemployed after the car was turned in, we were never notified by Toyota—nor was there an amendment or objection filed prior to the confirmation hearing, my sd is living with her mom, and my husband has been driving her to and from work as needed.
I sent an email to our attorney to let her know that to our knowledge sd has not had possession after the car after we turned it in, and currently does not have a vehicle.
So many contradictions in the document…..
Any thoughts?
Comment