top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

New 910 Rule Case on Vehicle Cram downs.

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    New 910 Rule Case on Vehicle Cram downs.

    In re McCauley 08-11644 ABC
    Honorable A. Bruce Campbell, BK District of Colorado
    Sorry, I don't have a direct link to the case.

    For those that don't know, the 910 rule does not allow debtors in a chapter 13 to cram down vehicles if the loan on that vehicle was taken out within the previous 910 days before filing your petition.
    The issue is that lien holders must have a "purchase money security interest" in the vehicle. Some debtors have been challenging the rule arguing that not all of the loan was related to purchasing the car, i.e. taxes, admin fees, financing of negative equity and therefore not PMSI.

    The courts basically agree that incidental costs such as admin fees, registration, attorneys fees, taxes etc, count as PMSI because those costs are required to allow the buyer to purchase the vehicle, but there has been a split as to whether the financing of negative equity on a trade-in counts. Further, if the financing of negative equity does not count as PMSI, does that mean the FULL loan balance is not PMSI (and hence the 910 rule does not apply), or only that portion of the loan that financed the negative equity is not PMSI and therefore can be striped?

    This court decision held that the financing of negative equity on a trade in does NOT count as PMSI. But, that the lender still maintains a PMSI for the loan balance that is not related to the financing of negative equity.

    Bottom line, if you purchased a car in the previous 910 days, but part of the loan balance was the financing of negative equity on a trade-in, you CAN CRAM DOWN at least that amount. But you cannot cram down to current fair market value of the vehicle.

    Example
    You purchase Ford Mustang and trade in your upside down Hyundai.
    Mustang price $18,000, incidental costs, 2,000, trade-in negative equity $3000
    Total loan balance, $23,000
    Under this decision, if you filed chapter 13 within 910 days of the purchase of that Mustang, you can reduce the principle amount owed on the car by $3,000 (of course, you would have to pay off the car INSIDE the chapter 13 plan).

    #2
    Think this is what you are referencing:

    http://www.cob.uscourts.gov/opinions...644opinion.pdf
    You can't have your cake and eat it too. But you can dip your finger in the bowl and lick the icing

    Comment


      #3
      Originally posted by krielly View Post
      Think this is what you are referencing:

      http://www.cob.uscourts.gov/opinions...644opinion.pdf
      Yep, that is the one, thank you for tracking down the link.

      Comment


        #4
        So if I understand, this particular case only deals with if you are filing and you have not yet exceeded the 910 day rule?

        Comment


          #5
          Originally posted by optimistic1 View Post
          So if I understand, this particular case only deals with if you are filing and you have not yet exceeded the 910 day rule?
          Correct. This case is for vehicles that you have owned (or the loan is newer than) for less than 910 days.

          Once you get past 910 days, you can cram down the note to current market value.

          Comment


            #6
            And don't forget, if the car was refinanced by another lender, then the 910 rule does not apply as well. Doesn't happen often ... but it does happen.

            Comment


              #7
              In my district, the refinancing of the car, does not get rid of it, it resets it, according to my attorney.

              Comment


                #8
                Originally posted by HHM View Post
                Yep, that is the one, thank you for tracking down the link.
                Google is a wonderful thing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
                You can't have your cake and eat it too. But you can dip your finger in the bowl and lick the icing

                Comment


                  #9
                  Would this only apply in Colorodo?

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Well, it would only have precedent in CO, but it would be persuasive in other districts.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Would this also apply, if you refinanced with the same lender to extend the terms but the car is worth less than loan balance ??
                      Stopped Paying CC's 2/2009. Retained Attorney 1/10/2010 Filed 1/23/2010. Discharged 5/19/10 $187K CC, $240K 2nd,$417K 1st, No asset Ch-7

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by albacore44 View Post
                        Would this also apply, if you refinanced with the same lender to extend the terms but the car is worth less than loan balance ??
                        Districts are split on the issue of whether a refi counts as PMSI.

                        Comment

                        bottom Ad Widget

                        Collapse
                        Working...
                        X