I was told the following by a bankruptcy attorney---anyone else ever hear this?
---he said that all BK filings that are INITIALLY filed as a Chapter 7 are scrutinized by the US Trustee because they have, for lack of a better term, a "quota" of filings they must object to and flag so as to prove they are being a careful watchdog. He then went on to say that when you file a Chapter 13, but SUBSEQUENTLY convert to a Chapter 7 (miss a couple of payments) that they do not review those at all. His conclusion is that if one is borderline on qualifying for a Chapter 7, expense-wise, then the way to go is 13 first, then convert to 7 (I guess this winds up having TWO BK filings on your credit report, but I suppose 2 doesn't make it any worse that 1, over the long run).
Anyone else ever hear of this "quota" system and the conversion tactic?
---he said that all BK filings that are INITIALLY filed as a Chapter 7 are scrutinized by the US Trustee because they have, for lack of a better term, a "quota" of filings they must object to and flag so as to prove they are being a careful watchdog. He then went on to say that when you file a Chapter 13, but SUBSEQUENTLY convert to a Chapter 7 (miss a couple of payments) that they do not review those at all. His conclusion is that if one is borderline on qualifying for a Chapter 7, expense-wise, then the way to go is 13 first, then convert to 7 (I guess this winds up having TWO BK filings on your credit report, but I suppose 2 doesn't make it any worse that 1, over the long run).
Anyone else ever hear of this "quota" system and the conversion tactic?
Comment