hi everyone,
i am contemplating just settling my debt since my BK seems to be alot more involved than I thought. I am no asset but too many circumstances and so many different answers has me thinking I should just wait till I can pay 20% of the total debt after it goes through a few more collection agencies. My question is, is there ANY benefit of settling vs BK if my credit is already horrible (415). I like the idea of settling which means I dont have to worry about losing any assets once I obtain them, but if it won't do a damn thing for my credit score, whats the point?? Any help from anyone would be much appreciated. Thanks.
i am contemplating just settling my debt since my BK seems to be alot more involved than I thought. I am no asset but too many circumstances and so many different answers has me thinking I should just wait till I can pay 20% of the total debt after it goes through a few more collection agencies. My question is, is there ANY benefit of settling vs BK if my credit is already horrible (415). I like the idea of settling which means I dont have to worry about losing any assets once I obtain them, but if it won't do a damn thing for my credit score, whats the point?? Any help from anyone would be much appreciated. Thanks.


- COMPLETED

Comment