top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Reaffirmation glitch?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    Thanks so much Tom. Your explanation really helps to clear this up for me. There is so much confusion about reaffirmation, local laws and then each case is somewhat different. I appreciate your wise input.

    Comment


      #17
      Originally posted by tcreegan View Post
      In theory, if you didn't reaffirm, the unsecured is discharged in the BK and the 25K secured survives as a lien on the property. Lender releases the lien when paid or in a settlement.
      What am I missing here?

      I thought the LIEN remains unchanged, no matter if it's partially unsecured or not. So in other words, I thought the lien should still be $59K.
      Filed CH7 9/24/2010, 341 on 10/28/2010, Disch.&Closed: 1/6/2011. FICO EX: 9/2: 672.
      FICO EQ: pre-filing: 573, After BK Public Record: 568, 10/3: 673.
      FICO TU: pre-filing: 589, After BK Public Record: 563, 9/2: 706.

      Comment

      bottom Ad Widget

      Collapse
      Working...
      X