top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What is the smallest amount of money a collector will sue for?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #16
    The sweet spot for collection lawsuits is $750-$3000. You will see more lawsuits in that range than any other because from a collection standpoint, those accounts have a higher return on investment. Through various methods, it is easier to actually collect on those amounts through garnishment, bank levy, and simply bullying the person into some sort of payment arrangement.

    As was pointed out, there is no amount too small. But unless you are dealing with a payday loan (that sues in small claims court on its own behalf) it is relatively rare to see a suit for $500 or less.

    Comment


      #17
      I was reading somewhere that if you keep your money in an online bank that only has a physical office in Delaware, then your bank account cannot be levied because Delaware does not allow bank account levies. I will try to research this and post if I find anything.
      Filed Pro Se Ch. 7 on 7/7/10 341 Meeting 8/19/10
      Last Day for Objections 10/18/10 Discharged to a Fresh New Start 11/1/10

      Comment


        #18
        Originally posted by freedomnow7 View Post
        I was reading somewhere that if you keep your money in an online bank that only has a physical office in Delaware, then your bank account cannot be levied because Delaware does not allow bank account levies. I will try to research this and post if I find anything.
        There are at least three threads in the BK Forum that mention the Delaware levy law for non-governmental levies. So far there has been no confirmation from anyone I can find posting on the Internet that the Delaware banks enforce this rule. I expect anyone doing this does not want to speak up. The threads are here:

        http://www.bkforum.com/showthread.ph...r-bank-account

        http://www.bkforum.com/showthread.ph...re-Not-Allowed

        http://www.bkforum.com/showthread.ph...ocial-security
        “When fascism comes to America, it’ll be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross” — Sinclair Lewis

        Comment


          #19
          Hey, Whatmoney, thanks a lot for this. I hope this helps the OP as much as it's helped me!
          Filed Pro Se Ch. 7 on 7/7/10 341 Meeting 8/19/10
          Last Day for Objections 10/18/10 Discharged to a Fresh New Start 11/1/10

          Comment


            #20
            Well, what I'm posting now is based on my own experience:

            My mother and I are basically are "twins" when it comes to our financial situation. We used to share the same employer, income, debt and even creditors. However, there is a little (but I guess important) difference. When my finances collapsed, I couldn't hold on to my house. Fortunately, my mother could. My credit report reflects a foreclosure, her's reflects a homeownership. I only got hit by 1 judgement - my mother got hit by 6. So I guess creditors also check if you have any fincial "potential" left.

            Could also be a coincident. The amounts of her judgements vary - but none of them is for less than $1,000. Mine was for $23K.
            Filed CH7 9/24/2010, 341 on 10/28/2010, Disch.&Closed: 1/6/2011. FICO EX: 9/2: 672.
            FICO EQ: pre-filing: 573, After BK Public Record: 568, 10/3: 673.
            FICO TU: pre-filing: 589, After BK Public Record: 563, 9/2: 706.

            Comment


              #21
              Originally posted by jbanks View Post
              When you are in a state that they can't garnish your wages is there a way to protect your bank account BEFORE they try to get it.
              Some people on this forum have used check cashing services like Walmart. The fees are low ($3 or $6).
              There are two secrets for success in life:
              1.) Never tell everything you know.

              Comment

              bottom Ad Widget

              Collapse
              Working...
              X