top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Can I take someone with me?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Can I take someone with me?

    I was wondering if courts (NC), allow a support person. I would like to take my son who is 15. I would feel better having someone with me, especially driving. Thank you, and if I can make it through tommorow it will be a miracle.

    #2
    I'm sure it would not be a problem!
    Good Luck tomorrow I am sure it will all go ok! just remember to breathe!
    Filed 7/17/10 1st 341 8/17/10 2nd 341 9/16/10 1st confirmation 10/06/10 2nd confirmation 11/10/10 Bar Date 11/15/10 3rd and final confirmation hearing Dec 8 and acceptance of plan Dec 29 2010....

    Comment


      #3
      Good Luck Merime!!! Be sure to let us all know how it went! (I'm sure it's all going to be just fine).
      Filed Ch. 7 11/8/10: Survived 341 Meeting 12/13/10 Report of No Distribution!! 12/14/10Received UST Presumption of Abuse!! 12/15/10 UST states Dismissal is Inappropriate! DISHARGED!! 2/22/11

      Comment


        #4
        Thanks and I will !!

        Comment


          #5
          merime, I found this information, and I think that even if they get a judgment against you, they aren't going to be able to do much about it. Your children and you depend on every cent you make for support.

          North Carolina Wage Garnishment

          Unless the debtor has substantial funds on deposit and no family dependent on those funds for support, garnishment of wages is not generally helpful in collecting other claims except:

          1. To enforce an order for child support (G. S. § 110-136),

          2. To recover unpaid taxes (G. S. § 105- 242(8), 105-368, 106-9.4), and

          3. To enforce a judgment for payment of medical services provided by a "public" hospital (G. S. § 131E-49),

          Under G. S. § 1-362, the debtor's earnings for personal services within 60 days prior to the order cannot be applied to the debt if it appears that the earnings are necessary for the use of the debtor's family. Further, future earnings have been excluded from the scope of execution under Harris v. Hinson, 87 N.C. App. 148,360 S.E.2d 118 (1987).
          Filed pro se, made it through the 341, discharged, Closed!!!

          Comment

          bottom Ad Widget

          Collapse
          Working...
          X