Received notice from plaintiffs attorney that he wants the court to approve a Motion, 'ex-parte' (after judgement against me but before recording) to 'Amend Caption'.
What it boils down to is that he wants the court to make the judgement out for 'CITIBANK,N.A.' instead of the name that the lawsuit was filed under, namely : 'CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA,N.A.).
Plaintiffs attorney cites that on JULY 1, 2011, CITIBANK/SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A. merged into CITIBANK, N.A.
NOTE THAT THIS TOOK PLACE 8 MONTHS AGO, AND I AM WONDERING WHY (?) THE ATTORNEY DID NOT MAKE ANY MENTIONING OF THIS AT THE HEARING IN EARLY MARCH this year WHICH RESULTED IN A JUDGEMENT AGAINST ME, IN FAVOR OF CITIBANK/SOUTH DAKOTA,N.A.
I SMELL A RAT !!!!!!! ......Especially as plaintiffs attorney states in a note to me: "If I do not hear back from you, I will assume you have no objection to the entry of the attached Order.
Please give me a call if you would like t discuss this matter in greater detail. This is a communication from a debt collector." Uhhhh....me call plaintiffs attorney ? I think NOT !!
THOUGH I AM FOR ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSE 'JUDGEMENT PROOF' (Meaning I have 'diddly' that can be attached, and am 81yrs young & poor as a church mouse) I have more recently come to the conclusion that I probably WILL file for BK...just to get a 'clean slate'.
HOWEVER...BK will still have to hold off a bit longer until I have some $ together for filing ect.
For that reason I would love to stall this 'THINGY' (judgement & proposed name change) a bit longer and buy some time.
ANYBODY HAS ANY IDEA IF THIS NAME CHANGE PROPOSAL CAN BE OBJECTED TO, AND IF SO ON WHAT GROUNDS ?
Seems to me that they/plaintiff should have to refile the lawsuit?
Your input is appreciated ! Thanks
What it boils down to is that he wants the court to make the judgement out for 'CITIBANK,N.A.' instead of the name that the lawsuit was filed under, namely : 'CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA,N.A.).
Plaintiffs attorney cites that on JULY 1, 2011, CITIBANK/SOUTH DAKOTA, N.A. merged into CITIBANK, N.A.
NOTE THAT THIS TOOK PLACE 8 MONTHS AGO, AND I AM WONDERING WHY (?) THE ATTORNEY DID NOT MAKE ANY MENTIONING OF THIS AT THE HEARING IN EARLY MARCH this year WHICH RESULTED IN A JUDGEMENT AGAINST ME, IN FAVOR OF CITIBANK/SOUTH DAKOTA,N.A.
I SMELL A RAT !!!!!!! ......Especially as plaintiffs attorney states in a note to me: "If I do not hear back from you, I will assume you have no objection to the entry of the attached Order.
Please give me a call if you would like t discuss this matter in greater detail. This is a communication from a debt collector." Uhhhh....me call plaintiffs attorney ? I think NOT !!
THOUGH I AM FOR ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSE 'JUDGEMENT PROOF' (Meaning I have 'diddly' that can be attached, and am 81yrs young & poor as a church mouse) I have more recently come to the conclusion that I probably WILL file for BK...just to get a 'clean slate'.
HOWEVER...BK will still have to hold off a bit longer until I have some $ together for filing ect.
For that reason I would love to stall this 'THINGY' (judgement & proposed name change) a bit longer and buy some time.
ANYBODY HAS ANY IDEA IF THIS NAME CHANGE PROPOSAL CAN BE OBJECTED TO, AND IF SO ON WHAT GROUNDS ?
Seems to me that they/plaintiff should have to refile the lawsuit?
Your input is appreciated ! Thanks