2nd and Collections after a BK 7

[spidge]

Its a business decision for us to and it seems the lenders only think thier business decisions are important. We should be ensuring our future just as the lenders are working to ensure thiers with making the best business decisions based on the numbers available.
I will not feel guilty or have any reservations over this.

[bulletproof77]

and that is exactly what I did...once you take a look at the cold, hard facts/numbers and strip the emotion out of it, it was the only course of action that made sense. Getting over feeling like a "loser" for walking away, but circumstances beyond my control made walking away rather mandatory. 7 months and CW/BofA still is doing nothing about taking the house back. Soon to be ex-wife living for free in it...

[chad9162]

Well if you sell, your 2nd could stop the sale even in a short sale. All lien holders have to agree to release their liens. You're negotiating power is the fact that you can walk away with no personal liability.

Your attorney, like mine, will charge you to negotiate. You could try the negotiation yourself, what do you have to lose right. A JDB bought the lien at a significant discount so no its not crazy to think you could get 10%-20% on the dollar.

You just need to be firm and remind them they get nothing if you walkaway. Right now time is on your side. So just wait if they become difficult. My attorney said I cold settle myself and then pay him to look at the written agreements for lien removal.

[frankies_mom]

One quick follow-up - should I call them before we meet with our attorney and try to settle for 10% or just wait until we talk to the attorney? I don't want to do anything counter-productive.

[frankies_mom]

Just an update:
We are going back to original BK attorney early next week to discuss our options with this 2nd mortgage. Anyone have any experience/advice on maybe negotiating with this JDB? I have read many posts about those settling 2nd mortgages for 10-20% or so. Would I be crazy to think we could do this too? Here is a breakdown of our house financials.
1st mortgage = 155,000
2nd mortagage = 42,000
According to a CMA we had done and recent sales within last 6 months, similar homes for our size are being sold between 149,000-159,000. So really, our 2nd would get nothing if we sold (short sale) or walked away.

[albacore44]

call it different, but my attitude is this. when our parents bought years ago , there intention was to pay off the house some day, and live in it till you die, pass it on to your kids to do with it what they will. modern banking changed all that. in the big picture, we all are renters.......why ?? we never plan on paying off the house. they are too expensive these days, and we need the tax advantages of writing off the interest. so, since i'm a renter, i want to rent in the best neighborhood for my family, and when they are raised and gone someday my wife and i will move on, and if i make a few bucks after paying off the bank (owner) great, if i have a little bit of equity take the money and move on. what more does man need in life but a place to sleep, a toilet, a good tv to watch the game, and some good beer.

[chad9162]

Those are all reasons used to "talk someone into it", but I don't think those facts really address the goals of most people when it comes to their house.

The Best courst of action for people who are significantly upside down in their house is to walk, file BK to take care of deficiency, a buy in 2 years.

While I agree that walking away would be the best course of action you'd still miss out on the tax write offs and savings. Here in California, a lot of people can "afford" their 2nd's but when you're so upside down then what's the point. The definition of "affordability" could be defined as one's willingness to sacrifice, but who's willing to sacrifice to just burn the money.

Walking away would still put you into a non appreciating asset (being a renter) and you'd still have to wait 2 years or more to buy again. Incomes in California are high due to high cost of living so most would benefit from tax write offs.

I agree with you that if you bought a house for $100K and only make $40K then there'd be no savings. People need to figure out what's best for them and realize it's just a house not a "home."

[HHM]

This "strategy" isn't risky at all. My house is under water by almost $140K and with all the layoffs and incomes dropping I don't see values increasing soon. So if I can't settle with the 2nd then I'd just walk away and start over.

Here are some benefits....

1. Yes, theoretically I'm renting, but unlike most renters I get to use the mortgage interest as huge tax deductions.

2. My mortgage is about the same as rentals in my area, but with the tax breaks I'm probably paying a few hundred dollars less.

3. By "riding through" I can walk away at anytime. In this economy that's huge. If I was renting they could sue me if I broke the lease or rental agreement

4. I could pay on my 2nd for 10 years and end up paying $50K but there's no guarantee I'd get it back with appreciation. My house could still be under water! By not paying, I could put that money in a bank account and have $50K.

5. Some people are under water $200K or more. It could take 30 years to get that back. So in theory they could live in the house for a very long time without paying the 2nd!

This whole process has made me think in such a different way. I am now thinking "its just business" like a CEO or a CFO. There's no ethics or morales involved. I mean what would the banks do in your shoes!

I agree with those facts, but I don't agree that it is the "best" course of action. First, if someone is upside down on their first, they should walk anyway, as you pointed out, it makes more sense to walk and re-buy a house at current market values (that is the best business decision). Second, Number 4, the whole reason someone got into this mess is they couldn't afford their bills, so for the average person, not paying the 2nd doesn't free up money to save (it would be great if it did, but that is not the case for most people in this situation). As for the tax benefit, if the person qualifies for a chapter 7, odds are they don't need the mortgage interest tax deduction. But, yes, it is a nice benefit. But is it worth it to have a non-growing asset.

Those are all reasons used to "talk someone into it", but I don't think those facts really address the goals of most people when it comes to their house.

The Best courst of action for people significantly upside down in their house is to walk, file BK to take care of deficiency, a buy in 2 years.

[chad9162]

To answer the OP questions, I'd try to settle with JDB and get something in writing that they are releasing the lien.

For me I may still leave, because I could buy a better house at cheaper prices than my current house. SAD!

[chad9162]

I am not a big fan of this strategy, for most people, it is too risky.

This "strategy" isn't risky at all. My house is under water by almost $140K and with all the layoffs and incomes dropping I don't see values increasing soon. So if I can't settle with the 2nd then I'd just walk away and start over.

Here are some benefits....

1. Yes, theoretically I'm renting, but unlike most renters I get to use the mortgage interest as huge tax deductions.

2. My mortgage is about the same as rentals in my area, but with the tax breaks I'm probably paying a few hundred dollars less.

3. By "riding through" I can walk away at anytime. In this economy that's huge. If I was renting they could sue me if I broke the lease or rental agreement

4. I could pay on my 2nd for 10 years and end up paying $50K but there's no guarantee I'd get it back with appreciation. My house could still be under water! By not paying, I could put that money in a bank account and have $50K.

5. Some people are under water $200K or more. It could take 30 years to get that back. So in theory they could live in the house for a very long time without paying the 2nd!

This whole process has made me think in such a different way. I am now thinking "its just business" like a CEO or a CFO. There's no ethics or morales involved. I mean what would the banks do in your shoes!

[frankies_mom]

oops, I meant someday if we go to sell.

[frankies_mom]

Thank you so much HHM for clearing this up and making it "make sense." I am not a fan of this strategy either and did not mean for this to happen. We were in the middle of a loan mod with CITI when United Guaranty Residential Insurance bought it up and then sent it right away to DSC collections. I was initially confused and don't understand why this happened when we were still trying to negotiate with CITI.

HHM - since I am in this mess, what do you think my best course of action is? I would like to, if possible stay in our house. Should I contact the my bankruptcy attorney? Try to settle? try to settle when someday we go to settle? Any advice is greatly appreciated. Thank you!

[justbroke]

I am not a big fan of this strategy, for most people, it is too risky. Unless you are actually able to settle, you will never generate positive value in your house, you are essentially renting.

I'm not either. Thanks for the followup.

[spidge]

Thanks HHM for clearing that up.

[HHM]

In severely depressed real estate markets, this amounts to the "do nothing and see what happens" approach to dealing with 2nd mortgages.

First, the lien of the 2nd mortgage survives a Chap 7 BK, no ifs, ands, or buts, about it. So, that should clear up any confusion on that point. Second, given current valuations, a 2nd mortgage holder is not in a "practical" position to initiate foreclosure, because the 1st mortgage holder gets paid first, and currently home values are too depressed. However, the 2nd mortgage has the "legal right" to foreclose, and that right survies the BK.

Basically, by riding through your 2nd mortgage and not making payments, you are gambling that you can settle the 2nd mortgage at some point in the future after the BK is discharged.

Here are the risks and challenges
1. Obviously, you need to come-up with the money settle. If you just filed chapter 7, how likely is that?
2. The 2nd mortgage company, or JDB, does not have to settle with you. You can't force them, they can sit on it, accumulating interest etc.
3. If you go to sell your house, you will have to deal with the 2nd mortgage then, and they can hold up the sale or even quash it unless they are paid in full. You need to be able to pass clear title.
4. If home values go back up, they can foreclose.
5. You can probably forget about refinancing, same issue as #3, most banks won't refinance the first if the second isn't dealt with in some way.

Regarding the discharge of chapter 7, the JDB should not be contacting you. The ONLY right they have is the right of foreclosure. Aside from letting you know that they own the debt and they are the ones you should be making payments too, they should not be making any effort to collect the debt.

I am not a big fan of this strategy, for most people, it is too risky. Unless you are actually able to settle, you will never generate positive value in your house, you are essentially renting.
To follow-up on JustBrokes comments about JDB's being able to enforce the lien in a sale scenario, realize that the burden will be on the seller. The lien is recorded at the county, it is going to sit there until someone with authority removes it, the lender or a court order. So, if you go to sell your property and do not have funds to satisfy the 2nd mortgage lien, you will have to file a suit in county court to quash the lien (and gamble that the JDB cannot actually show they have the right to collect). Same issue with the foreclosure, if a JDB initiates foreclosure, the burden will be on you to remove the foreclosure to county court to quash the lien and stop the foreclosure.