We have a house that WAS our home for 16 years. Stupidly bought a larger (not by alot though) house before selling the first, so we were forced to rent it out. We're giving the rental back to the mortgage company, we've already abandoned it to them, per our Attorney's advice.
My question then is this: Since we don't technically own the home we're living in, there is a legal land contract on file, do we have to use the Homestead Exemption on the land contract home or can we use unused Homestead Exemption (from our rental) to protect personal property?
Our attorney felt that we don't REALLY have any interest in our land contract home, we can be evicted if we don't make payments, but I'm not so sure I agree with that. We currently owe 73,000 on the owner's mortgage (we're making the payments for them) and the house is worth about 90,000. Thanx!
My question then is this: Since we don't technically own the home we're living in, there is a legal land contract on file, do we have to use the Homestead Exemption on the land contract home or can we use unused Homestead Exemption (from our rental) to protect personal property?
Our attorney felt that we don't REALLY have any interest in our land contract home, we can be evicted if we don't make payments, but I'm not so sure I agree with that. We currently owe 73,000 on the owner's mortgage (we're making the payments for them) and the house is worth about 90,000. Thanx!
Long time no talk to. I had been told by one attorney that since we have a land contract, we're essentially glorified renters and that the Trustee won't really look to the house for any equity, but by the same token, I started wondering if that meant we don't get a homestead exemption then since we're giving BACK the rental and don't technically "own" our primary residence.
Shoot, I hope someone has some experience. I think I'm going to call my lawyer's office just so I know one way or another because now it's going to bug me.
Comment