top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Funds in IRA were not "reasonably necessary for the support" of the debtor and any...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Funds in IRA were not "reasonably necessary for the support" of the debtor and any...

    January 18, 2006: Funds in IRA were not "reasonably necessary for the support" of the debtor and any dependent.

    That portion of a Chapter 7 debtor's individual retirement account (IRA) which he had not successfully exempted under the "wildcard" exemption statute, in the amount of $16,352, was not "reasonably necessary for the support" of the debtor and any dependent, and could not be exempted under a separate exemption statute for the debtor's interest in a stock bonus, pension, profitsharing, annuity, or similar plan or contract. The debtor and his wife currently had more than $500 per month in disposable income and would be relieved of $77,000 in unsecured debt and all but $6,000 of their total debt as result of their Chapter 7 discharge. Moreover, the debtor and his wife, at ages of 52 and 49 respectively, both had a significant amount of time to rebuild their retirement savings.
    Im not an attorney or a trustee. You cant trust me either though!

    [x] - Done with 341? Join the 60 Day Club! ___________[x] - Im Discharged! Whoo Hooo!
    [x] - Poll: Should I File Pro-Se ____________________[x] - New BK Law: Median Income, Means Testing and Presumptive Abuse
    [x] - Zombie Debt Collectors Dig Up Your Old Mistakes _-[x] - Bankruptcy Law Resource
    [x] - Need A Fast Answer? Available 24/7!--__________[x] - Dont Be A Hero On Your Budget - You Wont Get An Award!

bottom Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X