Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!) (updated: 04/28/2015)

Welcome to the Bankruptcy Forum. Bankruptcy (BK) Forum is known as BKForum.com and will be referred to as BKF hereinafter. In order to ensure a long term success of our vibrant community, we have established certain rules and guidelines to which everyone must adhere to. Please take your time to carefully read our rules, before you start to participate in the community.

Things you agree to do:
BKFORUM.com (BKF) users agree to use the search function before starting a new thread. This prevents duplicate discussions and allows for better organized topics.

All BKF users agree to read the sticky posts which may be available at the top of a forum page. These Sticky posts often contain valuable information. They may also outline more rules and guidelines specific for that particular forum, stickies are put in place by that forums moderator(s) or admin(s).

Things you agree not to do:

All BKF users agree not to call people names or write a post simply to make a personal attack, or get a negative reaction; this behavior is not allowed on our forum. The use of derogatory language aimed at anyone will be severely dealt with. There is no need to agree with each other, or to even like each other. However, by signing onto BKForum.com you agree to treat each member and guest with the respect they deserve. No threats or personal attacks will be allowed.

All BKF users agree not to discuss, engage, or encourage any behavior or activity which violates the law. Discussion of drugs, violence, murder, theft, vandalism, fraud or any other issue which could be used to help individuals break the law is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to "bump" old threads, unless there is a specific benefit to the community by doing so. But in most cases, please don't post in very old threads, instead start new threads.

All BKF users agree not to attempt/use another members account. It is against BKF rules to use any account other than your own. Impersonating another member will result in an immediate ban. It is also against the rules to open more than one account in your own name without permission from a moderator or administrator. If you have been banned for any reason, it is against the rules to open another account. If you were banned temporarily and you are caught using another account you will be banned permanently. Choosing a moniker which is similar in either sound or spelling as a moderator or administrator is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to private message any moderator, admin, or other member with questions related to their personal circumstances (Questions about the forum or issues with the forum are ok). This forum only works when members share their experience and insights with everyone.

Things you agree not to post:
All BKF users agree not to post any derogatory/racist/or sexist remarks. This includes attachments, links and all information contained within posts, signatures, and avatars, failure to comply with this rule will result in a permanent ban.

All BKF users agree not to post any copyrighted or trademarked information without the express written permission of the owner(s) / proper citation of source.

All BKF users agree not to post any real names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, social security numbers, or any other personal details (their own or other people's).

All BKF users agree not to post links, pictures, attachments, videos, or the like of pornographic content, objectionable material or extreme violence, whether cartoon or real.

All BKF users agree not to use BKF for advertising purposes without a written contract between yourself/company/agent and the administration of BKF. Blatant advertising will result in a ban.

All BKF users agree not to spam the forums. Spam includes but is not limited to posting erroneous, non-relevant-useless, off-topic, or meaningless posts. Spam may also include posts which contain no text, or large areas of blank space between lines. Simply posting emoticons without text is considered spam. BKF is the largest bankruptcy message board and all the content is intended to help other users. Please help us improve the quality of our forum by making sure that your posts are well-worded, spell checked, grammatically correct and syntaxed.

Regarding actions of moderators and administrators:

The forum is no place to air out your opinion or be judgmental of our staff and its capabilities.

All BKF users agree not to abuse or mistreat moderators or administrators. It is against BKF rules to post any information regarding bans or any other action taken by a member of the moderating or administrative team. If you wish to discuss bans or warnings please do so via PM. To place a complaint against a moderator, send a PM to a super moderator. All Moderators are equal, any decision made by a moderator must be adhered to. If a moderator tells you something you do not like, do not go to another moderator looking for a different answer. If you are caught doing this you will be banned. The moderators work as a team and respect the decisions made by their peers and will help enforce them unless an administrator tells them differently.
If you have an issue with how the forum is run, then notify one of our administrator and we will look into the situation. We have in the past and still do appreciate any input that you offer this forum. But critical input and/or judgmental postings towards the staff will result in you getting banned.


Should you find a thread offensive or out of line, then notify a Mod in a PM so they can evaluate the situation and do the action deemed necessary.

All moderators do have active "other" lives outside of the forum and help moderate this forum in their spare time throughout the days and weeks.

If you have a problem with a member or Mod follow the proper channels of reporting it.

BKF reserves the right to delete any posts which contain anti-BKF comments or discussion. Any bashing of moderators or administrators, or any of their discussion or actions will also be deleted, and the responsible posting party(s) will be banned. Any public anti-BKF advertising, communication, or posts on another forum will result in permanent bans as well.

All warnings and bans are decided by individual moderators and administrators. Warnings are preferable to bans however, for serious offenses and repeat abusers bans will go into effect. The length of the bans can vary from several hours to permanent.

All messages posted or sent including through PM are the property of BKforum.com.

All BKF users agree not to advertiser on the forum (Niether by posting, private messaging or using your signature). If you are a company/attorney/legal adviser wishing to advertise on the site or sell a product, you must contact the head administrator and inquire about our advertising packages.

All bankruptcy related opinions expressed on BKForum.com are those of their authors and not necessarily of BKF, its staff or representatives.

You agree not to copy any material/post/content from BKF without written permission from our head administrator .

By posting on this forum you agree to these terms and conditions, including any punishment deemed appropriate by moderators or administrators in the event of an offense.

Administrators/Moderators can change these rules at any time without prior notice.
See more
See less

2nd Lien, Unsecured Portion?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2nd Lien, Unsecured Portion?

    Our chapter 7 was discharged this year.
    We originally took out a 2nd mortgage for:$59,858.

    On our schedule D-"Creditors Holding Secured Claims" there is a column that states: UNSECURED PORTION, IF ANY. Our second lien shows a figure of $35,536.

    I realize lien stripping is not available in chapter 7 but it is my understanding that all unsecured debt is discharged.

    We did not reaffirm and are about to participate in the 2MP program. The lender says they are still secured for the full amount and that this just shows Loan to Value ratio. Is this true???

    I need to know before I sign a modification of any kind. Thanks in advance.

    JET

  • #2
    Who told you that lein stripping is not valid in chapter 7. I have my lien stripped and then went through a modification plan and the 2nd was treated like an unsectured creidtor (since ther was no equity in the hase after first. Here is how mine went.

    House appraised at $112k
    1st mortgage $137k
    2nd mortgage as $37k.

    Sicne the 2nd mortgage had no equity after the priority lein holder judgge ruled it is an unsecured loan.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Ihatebk View Post
      Who told you that lein stripping is not valid in chapter 7. I have my lien stripped. . .
      I can assure you there is no "published" authority to strip off a 2nd in a Chapter 7. If you filed an AP in your Chapter 7 and got the Judge to enter a Judgment/Order stripping the 2nd you got it because the lender failed to file an Answer and your Judge decided to enter such a Judgment/Order on the basis of a default.

      If you were able to get the entry of such a Judgment/Order in any other way I would like more details. I have filed 2 AP's for clients in the context of a Chapter 7. One was able to get the strip due to the lender's failure to file an Answer (default judgment) and the other is still pending. An Answer was filed in the second case and now we are attempting to negotiate a settlement. If we do not settle we walk since there is no way to win the AP in the context of a 7.

      If you do not have a Judgment/Order stripping your 2nd then the lien passed through your Chapter 7 fully intact. The underlying debt was discharged but the lien was not released and, if you attempt to sell you will have to deal with it. Further, if at some point, the 2nd decides to foreclose, you will lose the property unless you work something out with the lender.

      Des.

      Comment


      • #4
        Des, Here is the deal. You have to file a chapter 13 and pay on that for 6 months. When you file on the chapter 13 ask that your lein be stripped. Then you ask for voluntary dismissal from the 13 which does not stop the order of lein dismisa When the 13 is dismissed and closed, your creditors will start calling upi again. Then file for chpater 7 relief and list the 1st a secured debt and the 2nd as an unsecured debt. This is how you get around the system. There are many goood links around th web on how tp do this. I did it and it worked fine. Here is a link that disusses the issue. Sorry I can't post the links becuase I don't have enough points. It can be done, but you have to a little more work to get there....

        h t t p : / / -> hismatter.com/money/credit/bankruptcy/chapter-7/lien-avoidance.htm
        h t t p : / / -> bankruptcyattorneytampa.net/featured/lien-strip-a-2nd-mortgage/

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Ihatebk View Post
          Des, Here is the deal. . .
          Ok, so let me get this straight:

          1. File Chapter 13;
          2. Immediately file an AP to strip the lien under 11 USC 506(a) & (d);
          3. Get a Judgment or Order stripping the lien under 506;
          4. Remain in Chapter 13 for 6 months;
          5. Voluntarily dismiss the Chapter 13;
          6. File Chapter 7 when you are ready and classify the 2nd under Schedule F (as you stripped it in the 13);
          7. And, by some miracle, listing the 2nd on Schedule F proves that the lien strip that took place in the 13 is valid and you never have to worry about the 2nd again.


          And, you say this has worked for you. Have you sold or refinanced the property since obtaining the 7 discharge? My guess is that you have not.

          The web site you posted for the Tampa attorney clearly states that the one case he found allowing the strip, like mine, was a fluke. The other web site I could not locate. If you found a web site that states the above works I would love to see it as such is a legal impossibility. Further, I sure hope no attorney advised you to take these steps as if they did, they committed mal practice - not sure if you have any recoverable damages, but there was mal practice nonetheless.

          Here is your problem:

          11 USC 349(b) states, “Unless the court for cause orders otherwise a dismissal of a case. . . reinstates. . . (2) any lien voided under section 506(d) of this title.”

          So, by operation of law, the moment you allowed your Chapter 13 to be dismissed that Judgment or Order you obtained under 506 became void. The 2nd lien is still a valid and enforceable lien against your property and when you try to do something with the property you will have to deal with it. Further, your lender still has the right to foreclose.

          You will find that I do not pull any punches on this forum so, I now say that I am sorry to burst the bubble but, I always call them like I see them. I don’t want consumers thinking they got away with something just to find out down the road, when it really counts, that they didn’t.

          Des.

          Comment


          • #6
            It worked exactly as you stated, I live in Idaho and yes I have sold the house 3 months ago with no problems. When they strip the lien on the second you will get a court order say that the 2nd lien is unsecured and that for hence forth is to be considered as unsecured. Once it is declared as unsecured, the 2nd would have to object to the ruling within 90 days, if the do not the order stands. Now only the first has a lien on the home. It worked for me in Idaho and got that advice from an attorney that has done many of them.

            Comment


            • #7
              @Ihatebk

              My guess is the Title Company screwed up and you were lucky. No doubt the 2nd will be suing the Title Company once it realizes the error that was made. Count your blessings as it is not your problem.

              Des.

              Comment


              • #8
                I stumbled over an article on this topic awhile ago and apparently you can strip off an unsecured second in Long Island - but only if you get the right judge. One will do it, the other two won't. For those who get "the stripping judge" , it means no more lien.

                In re Lavelle, No. 09-72389-478, 2009 WL 4043089 (E.D.N.Y. November 25, 2009).

                edit to add: Reading an opinion from the circuit court (In re McNeal) in Georgia on this issue in which they state that the judge in the Lavelle case is the only one who has ruled contrary to the Supreme Court (In re Dewsnup) on this issue. So sounds like Ihatebk just got lucky after all.
                Last edited by debee; 04-25-2011, 12:50 PM.
                There are two secrets for success in life:
                1.) Never tell everything you know.

                Comment


                • #9
                  @debee,

                  I see you did some further research. In fact, what transpired in that NY District over the span of 5 months is interesting. The Lavelle decision, which was not published, came out in November, 2009. In February, 2010 a different Judge in the same District published an opinion saying it the stip off in a 7 was not allowed. Then in March, 2010 a 3rd Judge, again in the same District, followed the published decision and said that the Judge in Lavelle was simply wrong.

                  Relying on the reasoning in Lavelle and because one of the Judges in my District suggested it and another Judge had actually approved an uncontested strip, I filed an AP in a 7 case in May, 2010 (despite the published opinion). The lender failed to file an Answer and we got a Default Judgment. We have only attempted this 1 other time but, unfortunately, an Answer was filed.

                  As of the last time I reviewed this issue there were still no published opinions allowing the strip. There were a few more like Lavelle but nothing I could cite to.

                  As to IhateBk's issue, that is a bit different. He/she filed a 13, obtained an Order or Judgment stripping the lien then allowed the case to be Dismissed. He/she then filed a 7 and got a Discharge. The only reason he/she was able to close on a sale without dealing with the 2nd in some fashion, was a screw up by the Title Company who failed to check with in-house counsel as to the effect of a dismissal of the 13 - assuming the Title Company even knew the 13 had been dismissed and wasn't misled about the Order stripping the lien. The 2nd can make a claim against the Title Company for allowing the closing. The Title Company, if sued, would most likely 3rd party in IhateBk, perhaps alleging some fraud, but in the end the Title Company's insurance will pay the 2nd off as a settlement. Whether or not the 2nd would be smart enough to go after the Title Company, well. . . that's the million dollar question.

                  Des.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Yeah, I know the OPs case and Lavelle's case are different. I also know her ruling wasn't binding & that the other two NY judges ruled differently (think I mentioned that in my post as well). I just thought the Lavelle case was interesting. For anyone living in Long Island, they've got a 1 in 3 chance of stripping the lien off a 2nd in a Chapter 7.
                    There are two secrets for success in life:
                    1.) Never tell everything you know.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by debee View Post
                      For anyone living in Long Island, they've got a 1 in 3 chance of stripping the lien off a 2nd in a Chapter 7.
                      Know what you mean. . . luck of the draw until such time as a higher Court rules on the issue in that Circuit.

                      Des.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Ihatebk View Post
                        It worked exactly as you stated, I live in Idaho and yes I have sold the house 3 months ago with no problems. When they strip the lien on the second you will get a court order say that the 2nd lien is unsecured and that for hence forth is to be considered as unsecured. Once it is declared as unsecured, the 2nd would have to object to the ruling within 90 days, if the do not the order stands. Now only the first has a lien on the home. It worked for me in Idaho and got that advice from an attorney that has done many of them.
                        Okay... but would like some clarification from you a bit further if you'd care to oblige. You state you've been successful in this however according to your posts, you havent even had your 341 yet for your newly filed Ch. 7... right? So what makes you believe that this is a done deal?

                        You state you sold this house 3 months ago but just filed Ch. 7 last week - so you were still in your Ch. 13 when you sold it, techically? Or did the 180 day rule apply between filings? Is this the same house you're currently living in that is set to foreclose in June? Also if the lender sought a release of stay due to non-payment on your 13... so did you voluntarily request a dismissal or did your creditor request the dismissal for non-payment? You didnt convert your 13..it was dismissed and from the sound of it, involuntarily, so different things apply. You will now have 2 BK filings on your record as well.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Pandora View Post
                          Okay... but would like some clarification from you a bit further if you'd care to oblige. .
                          Good catch Pandora. Should have read posting history. Clearly the facts are much different from what was posted. Looks like a foreclosure will happen in June. Three months ago IhateBk was in a 13 and from the history we know that any sale of real property would not have been the residence. Maybe there was another property that the debtor was able to sell short through Section 363. If so, such is a far cry from obtaining a strip order in a 13, dismissing the 13, filing a 7, obtaining a discharge and then selling property without dealing with the junior lien. Lots of "facts" are missing.

                          Des.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            hiya Des

                            I'm just trying to ensure that people dont think this is the norm "oh I'll file a Ch. 20 and be done with the lien..." as it doesnt really work that way; well.. you would know... you're a lawyer

                            Some things just aren't do-able...and as you said, many things are missing or need to be elaborated upon.

                            Comment

                            Unconfigured Ad Widget

                            Collapse
                            Working...
                            X