Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!) (updated: 04/28/2015)

Welcome to the Bankruptcy Forum. Bankruptcy (BK) Forum is known as BKForum.com and will be referred to as BKF hereinafter. In order to ensure a long term success of our vibrant community, we have established certain rules and guidelines to which everyone must adhere to. Please take your time to carefully read our rules, before you start to participate in the community.

Things you agree to do:
BKFORUM.com (BKF) users agree to use the search function before starting a new thread. This prevents duplicate discussions and allows for better organized topics.

All BKF users agree to read the sticky posts which may be available at the top of a forum page. These Sticky posts often contain valuable information. They may also outline more rules and guidelines specific for that particular forum, stickies are put in place by that forums moderator(s) or admin(s).

Things you agree not to do:

All BKF users agree not to call people names or write a post simply to make a personal attack, or get a negative reaction; this behavior is not allowed on our forum. The use of derogatory language aimed at anyone will be severely dealt with. There is no need to agree with each other, or to even like each other. However, by signing onto BKForum.com you agree to treat each member and guest with the respect they deserve. No threats or personal attacks will be allowed.

All BKF users agree not to discuss, engage, or encourage any behavior or activity which violates the law. Discussion of drugs, violence, murder, theft, vandalism, fraud or any other issue which could be used to help individuals break the law is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to "bump" old threads, unless there is a specific benefit to the community by doing so. But in most cases, please don't post in very old threads, instead start new threads.

All BKF users agree not to attempt/use another members account. It is against BKF rules to use any account other than your own. Impersonating another member will result in an immediate ban. It is also against the rules to open more than one account in your own name without permission from a moderator or administrator. If you have been banned for any reason, it is against the rules to open another account. If you were banned temporarily and you are caught using another account you will be banned permanently. Choosing a moniker which is similar in either sound or spelling as a moderator or administrator is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to private message any moderator, admin, or other member with questions related to their personal circumstances (Questions about the forum or issues with the forum are ok). This forum only works when members share their experience and insights with everyone.

Things you agree not to post:
All BKF users agree not to post any derogatory/racist/or sexist remarks. This includes attachments, links and all information contained within posts, signatures, and avatars, failure to comply with this rule will result in a permanent ban.

All BKF users agree not to post any copyrighted or trademarked information without the express written permission of the owner(s) / proper citation of source.

All BKF users agree not to post any real names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, social security numbers, or any other personal details (their own or other people's).

All BKF users agree not to post links, pictures, attachments, videos, or the like of pornographic content, objectionable material or extreme violence, whether cartoon or real.

All BKF users agree not to use BKF for advertising purposes without a written contract between yourself/company/agent and the administration of BKF. Blatant advertising will result in a ban.

All BKF users agree not to spam the forums. Spam includes but is not limited to posting erroneous, non-relevant-useless, off-topic, or meaningless posts. Spam may also include posts which contain no text, or large areas of blank space between lines. Simply posting emoticons without text is considered spam. BKF is the largest bankruptcy message board and all the content is intended to help other users. Please help us improve the quality of our forum by making sure that your posts are well-worded, spell checked, grammatically correct and syntaxed.

Regarding actions of moderators and administrators:

The forum is no place to air out your opinion or be judgmental of our staff and its capabilities.

All BKF users agree not to abuse or mistreat moderators or administrators. It is against BKF rules to post any information regarding bans or any other action taken by a member of the moderating or administrative team. If you wish to discuss bans or warnings please do so via PM. To place a complaint against a moderator, send a PM to a super moderator. All Moderators are equal, any decision made by a moderator must be adhered to. If a moderator tells you something you do not like, do not go to another moderator looking for a different answer. If you are caught doing this you will be banned. The moderators work as a team and respect the decisions made by their peers and will help enforce them unless an administrator tells them differently.
If you have an issue with how the forum is run, then notify one of our administrator and we will look into the situation. We have in the past and still do appreciate any input that you offer this forum. But critical input and/or judgmental postings towards the staff will result in you getting banned.


Should you find a thread offensive or out of line, then notify a Mod in a PM so they can evaluate the situation and do the action deemed necessary.

All moderators do have active "other" lives outside of the forum and help moderate this forum in their spare time throughout the days and weeks.

If you have a problem with a member or Mod follow the proper channels of reporting it.

BKF reserves the right to delete any posts which contain anti-BKF comments or discussion. Any bashing of moderators or administrators, or any of their discussion or actions will also be deleted, and the responsible posting party(s) will be banned. Any public anti-BKF advertising, communication, or posts on another forum will result in permanent bans as well.

All warnings and bans are decided by individual moderators and administrators. Warnings are preferable to bans however, for serious offenses and repeat abusers bans will go into effect. The length of the bans can vary from several hours to permanent.

All messages posted or sent including through PM are the property of BKforum.com.

All BKF users agree not to advertiser on the forum (Niether by posting, private messaging or using your signature). If you are a company/attorney/legal adviser wishing to advertise on the site or sell a product, you must contact the head administrator and inquire about our advertising packages.

All bankruptcy related opinions expressed on BKForum.com are those of their authors and not necessarily of BKF, its staff or representatives.

You agree not to copy any material/post/content from BKF without written permission from our head administrator .

By posting on this forum you agree to these terms and conditions, including any punishment deemed appropriate by moderators or administrators in the event of an offense.

Administrators/Moderators can change these rules at any time without prior notice.
See more
See less

4 years after BK discharge, collection agency pressing charges against me

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 4 years after BK discharge, collection agency pressing charges against me

    Hi everyone,

    I hope that someone may be able to provide me with advice. In late 2008, I successfully filed for Chapter 7 (pro se, with help from users on this forum!). My case proceeded with no surprises and was discharged in early 2009. Since then I have gotten a better job and successfully rebuilt credit.

    In the interim, I would periodically receive letters or calls from collectors trying to collect on a credit card debt that I included in my BK filing and was presumably discharged. I would tell them the case number and fax them supporting paperwork, and the calls/letters would stop until I received another piece of correspondence from another collection agency trying to collect the same debt. Rinse, repeat.

    Today, my family (not me) received a call from someone who stated they were looking for me for the purposes of serving me papers. I called the number they left, and the man told me that there was a lawsuit being filed against me by the DA for check fraud, with the plaintiff being the original credit card company. I explained that the debt was discharged in a bankruptcy. He quoted back a handful of generic facts about my case (such as the filing and discharge years) and said that the debt was not listed in the paperwork and is still valid. He said that the total amount of the debt was now $7000+ (the original credit card debt was $1200) and that it would be felony fraud charges, but he could make my problems go away if I paid him $700 give or take. I informed him that the debt was listed in the schedules (I checked and verified that it was) and said that I would file information with the court to that effect. He mentioned that I should submit a copy of the schedules to him right away and that he would forward it to legal and “see what he could do.” Before he hung up, I got his name, company, and a court case number that I have not verified with the local courts.

    The entire exchange seemed bizarre, and I’m not sure where to go next. I feel like I’m just getting shaken down to see if I will pay on a discharged debt, but I’m not sure. I have not sent him any information. What should I do?

  • #2
    If you were a no asset case, he doesn't have a leg to stand on.
    Pretty much he's just blowing smoke. Don't let it get to you.
    IN FACT-- if you send the discharge papers and harassment continues- sue them for FDCPA violations. Could be a nice chunk of change for you.
    And WELCOME and congrats on finally posting and your successful pro se! Hope you will post some more, could be very helpful to others considering doing so!!!

    Keep On Smilin'

    Comment


    • #3
      This is so bizzarre. No one can threaten jail time or that it is a felony fraud. if it was felony fraud, they would have already went through "normal" channels to prosecute the offense. In fact, I believe the words used by the collection agency were "illegal" in and of themselves under collection law.

      Regardless of what they said, the debt is discharged. In fact, they only had until the bar date for determining dischargeability to fight this. This creditor is just preying upon an ill-informed pro se debtor. I would pounce on this creditor without any regard for any lack of knowledge, on their part, that the debt was in fact discharged. If you were a no-asset case, the dischargeability of the debt is not in question! A (Chapter 7) discharge in a no-asset case, discharges "all" debts that arose before the filing of the petition unless you reaffirm some specific debt.

      In fact, you should re-open your case for the sole purpose of a willful and egregious violation of the permanent discharge injunction and for sanctions. This type of activity will continue unless and until debtors go back to the bankruptcy court to have the offenders punished and sanctioned. I might shop this around with several bankruptcy attorneys to see if they would take this on contingency. Some attorneys like these types of cases where they can earn fees and punish bad creditors.

      Of all the creditors that tried to call me and tell me I owed them something -- which was discharged -- not one has popped back up. I never "talk" to these people anyhow. I tell them, in no ambiguous terms, that the debt is discharged and that they should seek legal advice before saying another word to me. Even if they did say "another" word, I let them know, again, that I would personally name them in my motion for contempt and sanctions and that they can personally explain to the judge why they are trying to collect on a discharged debt.

      By the way, and I'm no attorney, I don't know how a credit card company can sue you for check fraud. It doesn't even make sense and this person may have just been "fishing" for information. Regardless, it is time to pounce and use the power and equity of the bankruptcy court and the finality of the bankruptcy discharge and permanent discharge injunction to set this creditor straight... once and for all.

      In fact, this whole thing is making me quite disturbed. I believe that in no way should you let this go. I truly feel that this is a perfect example of a situation in which the case should be re-opened. (There would be no cost to you to re-open, even though the Clerk may think you should pay the $260 re-opening fee. Just make sure, if you do file a motion to re-open, that you mention that it is to determine dischargeability and for sanctions; there is no cost for those items.)
      Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
      Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
      Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog


      I am not an attorney. Any advice provided is not legal advice.

      Comment


      • #4
        Thanks both of you for your replies! Thanks especially justbroke; it was your advice that you gave me so long ago that made it possible for me to file successfully on my own (I wish I could remember what my username was...mentalward perhaps?). My case was a no-assets case, and I was pretty firm in the impression that all debts of this nature were discharged-even if they weren't listed-unless it can be shown that I omitted them intentionally, which was not the case here. In fact, this debt was one of my oldest, dating back to 2005, so I was able to include the original debtor as well as the initial collection agency in my schedules. It was well-documented.

        He seemed to be tossing out information that would be easy to find with a couple of basic searches. The check fraud is especially bizarre, as I have never written bad checks and there were none included in my filing, but I think I know where it came from: Freakishly, there is another individual in my small town with the same first name, last name, and birthday as me, who has several bad-check warrants out. Only our middle names and birth years are different (and then only by one year: '82 vs. '83). This collector probably found it on some public-records search and thought he'd threaten me with it.

        I will check on the case number he gave me to ensure that there is no legal action pending against me, and then take it from there. I am interested in re-opening this case in pursuit of sanctions, but I have little faith in the local attorneys. There are only two, and during my hearing in court, every single bankruptcy case that had been filed by either of them ran into trouble due to obvious paperwork problems. One of the lawyers even showed up wearing dirty jeans, which drew the ire of the trustee! Only myself and one other couple, who also filed pro-se, made it through unscathed. The other 20-25 cases were continued and the attorneys dressed down for wasting the court's time. Yikes! I will post any updates, in case this is useful to anyone else.

        Comment


        • #5
          With that information, it's starting to make sense. If there is another person with the same name that was writing bad checks, then the collector probably does have you confused with him. If that is the case, that's why he was threatening you, even after you stated that you had discharged in chapter 7, because you can't discharge criminal acts.

          When you speak with the collector again, you need to point him in the right direction, and that direction is not towards you......
          All information contained in this post is for informational and amusement purposes only.
          Bankruptcy is a process, not an event.......

          Comment


          • #6
            At a minimum, I'd contact both the FTC and, your states AG's office and file complaints.

            Comment


            • #7
              I don't believe that anyone should be treated that way by any creditor. Personally, I would have already submitted my motion to re-open, yesterday.
              Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
              Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
              Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog


              I am not an attorney. Any advice provided is not legal advice.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by justbroke View Post
                I don't believe that anyone should be treated that way by any creditor. Personally, I would have already submitted my motion to re-open, yesterday.
                And I personally believe that as well.
                All information contained in this post is for informational and amusement purposes only.
                Bankruptcy is a process, not an event.......

                Comment


                • #9
                  This is a scam.

                  They are violating the FDCPA as well as bankruptcy court laws.

                  Don't pay them anything.

                  Record their calls, if possible, and tell them you are going to be giving these recordings to your attorney general's office. And then follow up by filing a complaint against them with the Attorney General's Office. I have personally found them to be very helpful in dealing with rogue debt collectors like West Asset Management, etc.

                  In the meanwhile realize that they are lying about everything. They bought a worthless bankrupted debt and they know it is worthless. The only way for them to get a penny out of it is to scare you into doing something foolish, like paying them.

                  They are so corrupt, that they probably don't care about the FDCPA, but nevertheless, they are violating it, and if you record their calls, you will have proof that they are violating it.

                  I would also send them a DV and C & D letter:

                  "I dispute the validity, and I request written verification from you.

                  This may be a case of mistaken identity or identity theft and I demand to see the information you have concerning this matter.

                  It is inconvenient for me to receive phone calls from you at any time and any location. Do not call me on the phone ever again.

                  I revoke any prior authorization you may have had to call my cell phone number and I demand that you never use an auto-dialer to call me on my cell phone.

                  Your continued collection activity is in contempt of the bankruptcy court. BK #........"

                  And send it off by certified mail.

                  They are already violating the FDCPA by threatening to put you in jail, lying about it being fraud, etc. But after they get this letter, they will be violating the FDCPA every time they call you on the phone. It is a flat $1000 in statutory damages, but there have been recent cases where debtors were able to get huge judgments against debt collectors who willfully and blatantly violated the FDCPA over and over again. If they use an auto-dialer to call you, they will be violating the TCPA, which is violation which carries about a $500 per call statutory damage. It mounts up. Enough to get a consumer attorney involved to sue them, if necessary for such a blatant violation of both the FDCPA and the TCPA.


                  Here's an interesting case...

                  "A jury in Montana awarded $311,000 last week to a Montana man who was sued by the debt collection law firm of Johnson, Rodenburg & Lauinger. JRL tried to seize his social security disability payments to satisfy a judgment for CACV, a debt buyer. The jury awarded $1,000 in statutory damages [for violating the FDCPA], $250,000 for the consumer’s emotional distress, and another $60,000 for punitive damages, the maximum permitted by Montana law."

                  http://caveatemptorblog.com/johnson-...pa-violations/
                  Last edited by GoingDown; 05-16-2013, 07:07 PM.
                  The world's simplest C & D Letter:
                  "I demand that you cease and desist from any communication with me."
                  Notice that I never actually mention or acknowledge the debt in my letter.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by justbroke View Post
                    I don't believe that anyone should be treated that way by any creditor. Personally, I would have already submitted my motion to re-open, yesterday.
                    And yes, I agree with this, too.
                    The world's simplest C & D Letter:
                    "I demand that you cease and desist from any communication with me."
                    Notice that I never actually mention or acknowledge the debt in my letter.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The Statute of Limitations for Fraud in Montana is 2 years.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Have you ever noticed ........... when these fine, up right citizens tell us words we do not want to hear ..... they NEVER follow up their vile threats with a letter?
                        Golden Jubilee was a year-long celebration held every 50 years in which all bondmen were freed, mortgaged lands were restored to the original owners, and land was left fallow: Lev. 25:8-17

                        Comment

                        Unconfigured Ad Widget

                        Collapse
                        Working...
                        X