top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

losing it..venting...and long

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    losing it..venting...and long

    ok. our 341 was Feb 15th. 3 objections, one being our payment isn't what means test says it should be. My attorney was going to talk with trustee 2 weeks ago and try and figure out how to overcome objections. Haven't heard a word from her. Today on Pacer, there is an amended plan. Weekly payment shows the same but on the Unsecured Claims paragraph 7 it says:

    Total unsecured debt is $135,148. After all other classes have been paid, Trustee will pay to the creditors with allowed unsecured claims no less than $228,789 or 1% whichever is great.


    There has been no communication with attorney until today b/c I'm freaking out about what this means. She emails me (does not call still) and basically tells me she talked with trustee and amendments are in response to trustee objections and we should be paying 100% based on means test because that's the governing factor. The means test does not show the additional $650 per month we have to save to pay taxes at end of year. It also shows me making $1600 per month which I do not now. At 341, We talked with trustee about the tax issue and he said to start savings account for this and send in quartely statements to him. Nowhere is this in the plan as an expense.

    She basically said our plan needs to 100% payback. That the $228K in the paragraph 7 is what our "pool" should be, so we should pay 100% because the unsecred debt is $135K. There is no way...none we could do this. At end of 341, she was going to talk to trustee.... I never heard a word of what was going on until today.

    I feel like I'm losing it. This is already so hard. I've cut and cut and cut. We have a lot of high expenses (independant medical insurance, rxs, etc) FAmily of 5. What is weird is that if our plan payment is at 100%, that would be $3800 per month (including secureds and priorities) AFter taxes and payment, we would be living off $3770 per month for a family of 5. My regular bills are $3692. That DOES NOT include food, clothes, rx's...anything. She alluded to the fact that if we go before the judge it is likely they would rule 100%. If I had that much money, we wouldn't filed in the first place. I've given back the luxery stuff (motercycle,jetski) I've given back my house. I cut daycare in half. I've cut cable/phone.

    So what now? Hold fast and go before the judge. If they say 100% then we'll have to dismiss our case. Then I guess, have the extra $650 a month taken out of husbands pay...me not work....wait 6 months praying no one sues us or garnishes us... and refile then? If everything stayed the same regarding expenses, just those 2 things would reduce "disposable income" to what payment we just turned in.

    I guess I thought that yes, means test determines what is disposable, but also "actual" expenses are considered and there is negotiations to come up with something that is doable. I don't know if my attorney isn't negotiating or if trustee is standing on this means test disposable income.

    Yes we are high income filers. Yes we have a lot of unsecured and secured debt. Yes we screwed up really bad and we're trying to do the best we can with this.....but I don't know what else to do.

    OK. Attorney just called upset with my email (it was not really a happy nice one) and basically said that in talking with trustee he said he had no leeway and that it should be 100%. Suggested pushing back confirmation to see who files claims so that might help payment be lower. She also said that if we do have to go before Judge.....it's a very conservative Judge that normally rules for Trustee suggestion.

    I hope and pray one day...and I have to believe this.... that we'll be out of this mess and looking back on it. Have to believe that.
    Last edited by dovette7; 05-02-2007, 11:25 AM. Reason: posted 2 times
    Filed: Feb 15, 2007
    Confirmed: Sept 20, 2007
    21 months down
    39 months to go

    #2
    I don't have any advice, Dovette.

    So much of what happens in BK depends on where people file, the Trustee they draw, and the Judge presiding over the Court.

    It sounds like everything that can go wrong for you has. And the fact that you've lost pretty much everything along the way,......... Well I can relate to that part. We cashed out retirement, spent our savings, and sold anything of value we had.

    Just know there are folks here who care. Who are praying for you. Who support you.

    ((Hugs!!))
    Filed Ch 7 - 09/06
    Discharged - 12/2006
    Officially Declared No Asset - 03/2007
    Closed - 04/2007

    I am not an attorney. My comments are based on personal experience and research. Always consult an attorney in your area to address concerns related to your particular situation.

    Another good thing about being poor is that when you are seventy your children will not have declared you legally insane in order to gain control of your estate. - Woody Allen...

    Comment


      #3
      update and better news...

      I forgot to mention that when I was talking with the attorney I questioned the line on the means test regarding rent. I actually mentioned this on the forum previously, On the line that should have irs allowable rent it said $0. I added up the total expenses and there was NO allowance for rent. So in my conversation with attorney, I questioned this. She first said the means test program automatically adds it in. I said no... doesn't show up.. She then said it was included in the previous line. I said no... and read to her that was the line for household expenses, food, clothes, etc. So she then said she didn't see any errors but she would redo the test and call me back.

      One hour later, she called and apologized to me because I WAS RIGHT. The means test had nothing allowed for rent. That was an immediate expense of $1263 that my payment would come down. Maybe because I went crazy with emails to her today or maybe because of this "error" she now talked with me for a long time actually going over expenses to cut and trying to figure out what we can do. She's going to talk to trustee to see if we can add the additional taxes that should've been taken out during the means test...to the means test. Doing that along with the rent added would lower our payment way down from 100% to approx $300 more a month than our proposed payment. I could do that. Since I've already cut so much...I could do it.

      So she's calling tommorrow to let me know what he says or if she thinks we'll have to go to the judge for the tax expense. It seems very wrong to me that having zero experience in this....How did I find the error on the means test to the tune of $1263? How did I have to reconfigure my taxes to ensure we wouldn't owe and start taking out more a week. I have been accused of being way to analytical but thank goodness I'm kind of obsessed with this because it seems even my attorney isn't 100% my advocate or else these things would be extremely verified.

      If you guys pray...say some for me that the taxes can be in the means test.. That would be best case scenario and I'm ready for some best case right about now........
      Thanks Sinkingfast for your positive words. This forum has really helped me. Especially the support & reading from you guys that I do have the right to know the information because it is MY bankruptcy.
      Filed: Feb 15, 2007
      Confirmed: Sept 20, 2007
      21 months down
      39 months to go

      Comment


        #4
        Glad to hear that the error your lawyer made will be corrected, Dovette - great catch on your part! No one cares about our cases more than we do. You have really gone through the wringer with this filing - you deserve some good news for a change.

        We are all praying that your taxes can be added into your plan. Hang in there, and no matter what happens, know that we are here for you.
        I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice nor a statement of the law - only a lawyer can provide those.

        06/01/06 - Filed Ch 13
        06/28/06 - 341 Meeting
        07/18/06 - Confirmation Hearing - not confirmed, 3 objections
        10/05/06 - Hearing to resolve 2 trustee objections
        01/24/07 - Judge dismisses mortgage company objection
        09/27/07 - Confirmed at last!
        06/10/11 - Trustee confirms all payments made
        08/10/11 - DISCHARGED !

        10/02/11 - CASE CLOSED
        Countdown: 60 months paid, 0 months to go

        Comment


          #5
          Wow. What a relief SO FAR. Taxes, you would think, should be included. After all, that money doesn't appear from "nowhere".

          dmc
          11-20-09-- Filed Chapter 7
          12-23-09-- 341 Meeting-Early Christmas Gift?
          3-9-10--Discharged

          Comment


            #6
            "Yes we screwed up really bad and we're trying to do the best we can with this.....but I don't know what else to do."

            I DITTO that statement with you. I'm feeling totally rooked as my payment just went up $182. Almost sorry I even filed, it's been unrealistic. I just keep hoping for the best and wait to see what happens.
            re-filed sept '07.... here we go again!

            Comment


              #7
              Why did your payment go up?

              We haven't filed yet, have just quit paying cc's and am going on a lot of assumptions -- but your note about your payment just going up and you just filed worries me.... I assume you mean it went up since you filed? Did they tell you why?

              Those debt negotiaters are starting to appeal to me again....

              Comment


                #8
                Hi there.. From what I have understood on the forum, your attorney files your petition with payment plan...a lot of times your plan may be confirmed at that amount. However, depending on the details of your means test and scheduals and your trustee possibly objecting...the payment could change. From reading on here, a lot of people are confirmed at the plan they proposed.

                The attorneys that I consulted with and ultimately the one I hired all gave me thier "opinions" of what payment would be. However, once we got into the real numbers, they were wrong. My case is not normal because we are high income filers, high unsecured debt, secured & priority debt, the means test show my having income which I do not have now.

                But from what I understand, and please you guys correct me if I am wrong, once you submit your plan payment, the trustee can try and find additional disposable income in your budget..places you can cut costs to increase payment and that of course depends on if you are paying back 100% or not. If you are paying 100% back in 36 months.... your payment shouldn't change. Every case is different as every trustee and judge are different. If you choose an experienced attorney, they will KNOW how the trustee works.

                That's a very big part of learning about Bankruptcy in the U.S today. There is no standard or cookie cutter avenue to having the plan confirmed. Hopefully your plan will be confirmed the way you file it! Mine however won't be because of the complexity involved.

                Please get as much information from this forum, attorney, or internet... on filing. I chose my attorney because I liked him over the others. Once he was retained, he handed me off to a junior associate of his. From then on there has, in my opinion, been a lack of communication, errors on my paperwork (one big one I caught) and looking back now, not very good advice. If they would have told me to WAIT 2-7 months to file and have additional taxes we will have to pay taken out as payroll deductions, then my income (that I don't have anymore but did 6 months previous) would not have been added on means test and the additional taxes would've been an expense. She told me it wouldn't make a difference. It has made a difference, a big one.

                Talk to a number of attorneys before making your decision and verify that they pretty much give you the same answers. Don't let my comments scare you because my case is not normal. But I have learned listening on this forum and researching, that we could've planned much better and it would have made a tremendous difference.
                Last edited by dovette7; 05-08-2007, 09:55 AM.
                Filed: Feb 15, 2007
                Confirmed: Sept 20, 2007
                21 months down
                39 months to go

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by CA3kids View Post
                  We haven't filed yet, have just quit paying cc's and am going on a lot of assumptions -- but your note about your payment just going up and you just filed worries me.... I assume you mean it went up since you filed? Did they tell you why?

                  Those debt negotiaters are starting to appeal to me again....

                  My payment went up because of an objection by the auto finance company. I had a 0% contract and they wanted prime plus additional percent interest. I'm just not happy about this at all. It seems the creditors are having more rights than the filers, I thought the reorganization is supposed to help not keep me eating ramen noodles for lunch each day.
                  re-filed sept '07.... here we go again!

                  Comment


                    #10
                    That is happening to me also. Our payment on the truck was at 0% and now is at 9%!! However because it was spread over 60 months, it reduced the total payment and the unsecureds get more money.
                    Filed: Feb 15, 2007
                    Confirmed: Sept 20, 2007
                    21 months down
                    39 months to go

                    Comment

                    bottom Ad Widget

                    Collapse
                    Working...
                    X