Hello Group -
One of the hot topics among Chapter 13 filers that never seems to get answered clearly has to do with the occasional huge disparity between the allowable deductions on Form 22C when determining disposable income, and the actual expenses of the debtor.
I went searching for information on this topic because it is quite relevant to me. One BK judge is quoted as saying that Form 22C describes the minimum disposable income that will be accepted in a payment plan, but the ultimate figure arrived at will depend upon the actual living expenses of the debtor.
A good lawyer can horse around with certain figures that cannot be determined with precision. But certain other expenses such as housing and maintenance costs are easier to determine with more exactitude. For instance - the mortgage/rent allowance for Middlesex County, New Jersey is $1100 per month in the IRS look-up table. I am a renter and pay far less than that - plus my utilities are included. That very significant difference could be applied by the trustee to the payment plan.
That would give me absolutely no "wiggle room" in the future if my housing circumstances were ever to change.
The trustee's job is to seek a fair compromise. The attorney's job is to secure the best settlement for the debtor. I wonder how often these objectives are at loggerheads with one another.
I have not had a follow-up visit with my own attorney since deciding to file. I would appreciate hearing from anyone who has had this particular dilemma.
Thanks in advance,
Willie R.
One of the hot topics among Chapter 13 filers that never seems to get answered clearly has to do with the occasional huge disparity between the allowable deductions on Form 22C when determining disposable income, and the actual expenses of the debtor.
I went searching for information on this topic because it is quite relevant to me. One BK judge is quoted as saying that Form 22C describes the minimum disposable income that will be accepted in a payment plan, but the ultimate figure arrived at will depend upon the actual living expenses of the debtor.
A good lawyer can horse around with certain figures that cannot be determined with precision. But certain other expenses such as housing and maintenance costs are easier to determine with more exactitude. For instance - the mortgage/rent allowance for Middlesex County, New Jersey is $1100 per month in the IRS look-up table. I am a renter and pay far less than that - plus my utilities are included. That very significant difference could be applied by the trustee to the payment plan.
That would give me absolutely no "wiggle room" in the future if my housing circumstances were ever to change.
The trustee's job is to seek a fair compromise. The attorney's job is to secure the best settlement for the debtor. I wonder how often these objectives are at loggerheads with one another.
I have not had a follow-up visit with my own attorney since deciding to file. I would appreciate hearing from anyone who has had this particular dilemma.
Thanks in advance,
Willie R.

Comment