Originally posted by TooMuchCredit
View Post
First American Credco has eAppraisalIT that Bank of America used to use, provide for free on their website, and that one was excellent. Seems BofA is using something else now.
I have used some custom models (electronic appraisals or AVMs) from RealQuest. They have the best, most accurate ones to date (one was within $1K of my actual professional appraisal).
I would say that the CMA, if the Realtor entered the premises, is good too, but they tend to be "ranges" and do not look at any of the other two appraisal methods (cost, income), and don't lock in on a specific number. CMAs (usually) only use one method of evaluation, market value, with several variations on that. However, a CMA always trumps those silly Zillow things.
When your appraisal is just "several" thousands from the balance on the first mortgage, you will generally get some pushback from the "junior" lienholder. This is only because several thousand dollars isn't that much. However, I've seen cases where these lenders come into a Valuation Hearing with a Zillow and/or a CMA, and just flat out lose against an Appraisal.
Option One presented a Comparative Market Analysis prepared by a real estate agent, which sets forth three figures: (i) market value $307,000.00; (ii) quick sales $293,000.00; and (iii) suggested list $314,900.00. The figures are apparently based upon comparables, including three property sales and three listings. The sales comparables are for property sales in November 2006, February 2007, and July 2007, with the highest sales price of $345,000.00 in July 2007 and the comparables located more than two miles from the Property. The “List Comp” information provides listing prices and not actual sales.
The Debtors presented a Uniform Residential Appraisal Report prepared by a Florida licensed residential appraiser. The Report values the Property at $224,000.00 based upon a sales comparison approach and the appraiser’s visual inspection of the interior and exterior of the Property. The Report values the Property at $222,198.00 based upon the cost approach.
Option One’s Analysis is entitled to minimal weight. It is not a formal appraisal conducted by a licensed residential property appraiser and no inspection of the Property was conducted. It contains no basis for the selection of the alleged comparables or the calculation of the alleged value. The real estate market has taken a substantial downturn since the July 2007 sale comparable. The Debtors established the Property has a value of $224,000.00.
In re: KEITH C. SMITH and SHARI D. SMITH, Case No. 6:07-bk-05041-ABB -- 2/21/2008
Middle District of Florida - Orlando Division
The Debtors presented a Uniform Residential Appraisal Report prepared by a Florida licensed residential appraiser. The Report values the Property at $224,000.00 based upon a sales comparison approach and the appraiser’s visual inspection of the interior and exterior of the Property. The Report values the Property at $222,198.00 based upon the cost approach.
Option One’s Analysis is entitled to minimal weight. It is not a formal appraisal conducted by a licensed residential property appraiser and no inspection of the Property was conducted. It contains no basis for the selection of the alleged comparables or the calculation of the alleged value. The real estate market has taken a substantial downturn since the July 2007 sale comparable. The Debtors established the Property has a value of $224,000.00.
In re: KEITH C. SMITH and SHARI D. SMITH, Case No. 6:07-bk-05041-ABB -- 2/21/2008
Middle District of Florida - Orlando Division
)
Leave a comment: