top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Conversion from 7 to 13?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PaKettle
    replied
    Originally posted by AZgirlie View Post
    I know it's probably rare, but it has happened to me. I have the absolute worst luck...

    The AZ trustee accepted my means test but the US trustee did not. I am not married, do not own a house, do not have children, and do not own any property worth anything. Needless to say,I'm paying waaaaaay too many taxes. I'm also filing pro se since I cannot afford to pay my debts, much less an attorney.

    My question is this - how can I convert to a chapter 13 when I have no disposable income? Can I fight it? Can the conversion be forced? AZ has absolutely no information on this at all.

    Thanks in advance!
    I don't know if anything can be done or not now that the UST has already spoken on your case.
    But I know that if I were you, I would talk to a few attorneys about it with the intention of hiring them if they can help you out of this mess!
    I know you can't afford it, but if I were you'd and if an attorney convinced me he could help me out of this mess, I'd beg, borrow or steal to hire an attorney to keep from getting thrown into a 13.

    You're not the only one...

    I have a friend who also was thrown into a 13, but by his attorney. At first the attorney said he qualified for a 7 but when he got down to filling out the forms he said my friend did not qualify.

    This is hard for me to understand because the guy is sleeping on the floor of his sister's house after a divorce and paying child support up the ying yang. But the attorney said at this time there was nothing he could do but 13. If I was him I'd have said "screw it, then, let's figure out a way to make me eligible for a 7".

    Leave a comment:


  • help me 07
    replied
    this is what im afraid of!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    i have bad luck too. im so nervous to file....
    i hope i dont convert to 13 or presume abuse..that would suck big time..

    Leave a comment:


  • kylinava
    replied
    Freshstart, I am in AZ also, can you possibly pm that lawyer to me also? We filed 1/10, and 341 is 2/14 but I am worried about dismiss or covert due to missing income on initial means test.

    Leave a comment:


  • SinkingFast
    replied
    You can try asking. The Trustee's office may answer some things and tell you to seek legal counsel on other things.

    Be sure to phrase your questions such that you're asking for info and not sounding like you're asking for advice. Advice type questions probably won't get answered.

    I would think you'd be entitled to know the basis of the Trustee's query. What particular points the Trustee is looking to resolve.

    Leave a comment:


  • AZgirlie
    replied
    No Motions to Dismiss or to Convert to Ch 13 either. Just the Statement that says I can file special circumstances,no reasons given. Which, by the way, is so very helpful since I am going this on my own...

    Can I contact the Trustee in my case? Will they answer my questions or just give me the same "I can't give you advice, you need to contact a lawyer for that" b.s.?

    Leave a comment:


  • SinkingFast
    replied
    Here's a link to Coma's MTD thread:

    http://www.bkforum.com/showthread.php?t=5105

    The UST had several issues with their filing. And it could be they got picked on because they filed Pro Se. Which could be happening in your case.

    They got an attny to step in and help out. As Lrprn suggested, you might want to at least Consult with a few. Possibly even consider retaining an attny as well.

    The UST has power that we as individuals don't. They know the Code inside and out. Decisions and Opinions that have been rendered to support their position are on the tip of their tongues. And they will quote, "In re blah, blah, blah" like it's second nature.

    Leave a comment:


  • lrprn
    replied
    Originally posted by AZgirlie View Post
    Can't afford a lawyer at this point, so I'm attempting to find all the information I can on my own. Thanks everyone.
    AZ, fighting the US trustee on your own is risky.

    Since you aren't paying your non-secured creditors now, can you use that money to help pay for a lawyer?

    At the very least, set up appointments for FREE initial consultations with 3-4 bankruptcy lawyers in your area. See what they think about your situation. Also ask if a payment plan might be possible - some lawyers will do that. Also check out Legal Aid in your area - charges are sliding depending on your situations. Any legal help will be better than trying to fight this on your own.

    Leave a comment:


  • freshstart06
    replied
    but as we all know each case is unique and different and every trustee is not the same, you never know what is going to happen. You have have two exact same situation with two different outcomes.

    Leave a comment:


  • freshstart06
    replied
    That is what I meant, Ohwell, car payments is pushing them into the negative similiar to Coma situation (remember Coma was not behind, his car note was very high and the trustee had a problem with it because it put them in the negative) and in order to keep it they had to file chpt 13 even though they had no disposable income. The trustee really just don't like to see negative, You guys told me that when I first became a member and I was negative and my paralegal told me as well. Schedule I am J is you budget without the unsecured debt and if you are still negative without unsecured debt then the trustee will look further into your file, as stated before the goal is to make your file make sense so they have no reason to look deeper unless you are one of the luckly number 250 then you have no choice.
    Last edited by freshstart06; 10-27-2007, 06:24 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • SinkingFast
    replied
    Originally posted by freshstart06 View Post
    there has been a few members on this board that had to convert to 13 because they would not give up their car or something else that put them into the negative. One member I can think of is coma, you may want to contact this member for details.
    Coma filed Ch 13 to save their car. They were in arrears at the time of filing. Otherwise, they could have filed a Ch 7. They were below the Median.

    They were sent to a new Duty Station where they eventually gave back the car they filed Ch 13 to save. Since then, Coma has Converted to Ch 7.

    Leave a comment:


  • SinkingFast
    replied
    Look in your History/Documents. See if you have a "Motion to Dismiss" there. It'll be a .pdf file. You should be able to read to see what the UST's Office is objecting to.

    If it's a Motion to Dismiss, you'll be getting a mailing about the Order. You'll also get a Hearing. You'll have a time frame,....... Probably 2-3 weeks,....... To get ready. When you go to the Hearing, you can plead your case. Provide amended Schedules if appropriate.

    Depending on the outcome of the Hearing, either your Ch 7 will go thru, or the Court will hold that your case to be Dismissed. Even tho you couldn't continue with your Ch 7, with your permission, the Court will allow you to Convert to Ch 13.

    Until you know what the UST's Office is peeved about, you're really flying blind.

    Leave a comment:


  • aachudneymiles
    replied
    every trustee is diff. how many cases he has and so forth.
    Last edited by aachudneymiles; 10-26-2007, 05:30 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • freshstart06
    replied
    LOL, we were high income as well and we went pro se, some thought we could not do it and we are now passed the 60 day period.

    YOu sound like me, I would give up my car in a second if it caused my case to get discharged. I will admit your attorney practice is different but if it works it works, I wish you luck, I just would not reaffirm and just pay on time.

    Leave a comment:


  • ohwell
    replied
    We have a car payment that pushes us negative, its our only vehicle, our other car got repossessed. We are upside down in the car we are making payments on. We don't have significant disposable income if they don't allow the reaffirmation.

    I inquired to my atty about this whole negative j schedule, and he said he always has negative schedules for his clients and doesn't allow any risk of disposable income showing. And he emphasized he NEVER allows it(I was challenging him quite a bit because of what I read here, because I was surprised myself). I also challenged him on the whole reaffirmation thing as well for the car. He said worse case scenario they don't allow the reaffirmation, but if we submit a statement from a relative/friend that they would assist in payments if there was a problem making them that is sufficient for the court.

    Our lifestyle is tight no doubt, but we aren't in the hole, for our schedule J our food budget is higher than what we would spend, but these are the figures our atty said he uses as standard for his clients. We are in a very high income area(Los Angeles), so who knows what the UST looks at in our district, starting to think they look the other way with some of these cases, given our hardship and our declaration statement of circumstances submitted with our petition, no one has objected thus far. Who knows.... I hate there are so many gray areas on what is allowed.
    So if our case gets converted or dismissed, then it will be proof that the opinion on the negative schedules is validated as true. If not, then maybe we are just one of the lucky ones.. Because as of right now, we are not following the rules according to the opinions here.

    I will give up this car in a heartbeat if that happens re: the reaffirmation if need be. But right now no news is good news lets hope.

    Leave a comment:


  • freshstart06
    replied
    there has been a few members on this board that had to convert to 13 because they would not give up their car or something else that put them into the negative. One member I can think of is coma, you may want to contact this member for details. I am really surprised that a Lawyer of 25 years would allow you to go into negative unless he could not avoid it, he should have advised you that the UStrustee or BK judge may not allow you to keep the secure debt that is putting you into negative. Please take the time to do a search on this board in regards to being in the negative.

    yes, what could happen if you are very negative is that you would have to either give up the secure debt that is causing the negative, get dismissed, or convert. Trust me, read up on this on this board. However, as you stated each case is unique and different and you may not have no problems at all. But the safe thing to do is make your numbers work so your schedules will not be negative, zero disposable is better then negative but a few dollars negative is okay too. You know what I mean.

    To be honest, if you are negative on schedules I an J that does not include unsecured debt then BK is not going to solve your problems, this means you have no room what so ever for error, increasing your income will help but while you are waiting for discharge you will still suffer, and may be back in a hole before your BK closes... this is something to consider.
    Last edited by freshstart06; 10-26-2007, 01:02 PM.

    Leave a comment:

bottom Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X