Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!) (updated: 04/28/2015)

Welcome to the Bankruptcy Forum. Bankruptcy (BK) Forum is known as BKForum.com and will be referred to as BKF hereinafter. In order to ensure a long term success of our vibrant community, we have established certain rules and guidelines to which everyone must adhere to. Please take your time to carefully read our rules, before you start to participate in the community.

Things you agree to do:
BKFORUM.com (BKF) users agree to use the search function before starting a new thread. This prevents duplicate discussions and allows for better organized topics.

All BKF users agree to read the sticky posts which may be available at the top of a forum page. These Sticky posts often contain valuable information. They may also outline more rules and guidelines specific for that particular forum, stickies are put in place by that forums moderator(s) or admin(s).

Things you agree not to do:

All BKF users agree not to call people names or write a post simply to make a personal attack, or get a negative reaction; this behavior is not allowed on our forum. The use of derogatory language aimed at anyone will be severely dealt with. There is no need to agree with each other, or to even like each other. However, by signing onto BKForum.com you agree to treat each member and guest with the respect they deserve. No threats or personal attacks will be allowed.

All BKF users agree not to discuss, engage, or encourage any behavior or activity which violates the law. Discussion of drugs, violence, murder, theft, vandalism, fraud or any other issue which could be used to help individuals break the law is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to "bump" old threads, unless there is a specific benefit to the community by doing so. But in most cases, please don't post in very old threads, instead start new threads.

All BKF users agree not to attempt/use another members account. It is against BKF rules to use any account other than your own. Impersonating another member will result in an immediate ban. It is also against the rules to open more than one account in your own name without permission from a moderator or administrator. If you have been banned for any reason, it is against the rules to open another account. If you were banned temporarily and you are caught using another account you will be banned permanently. Choosing a moniker which is similar in either sound or spelling as a moderator or administrator is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to private message any moderator, admin, or other member with questions related to their personal circumstances (Questions about the forum or issues with the forum are ok). This forum only works when members share their experience and insights with everyone.

Things you agree not to post:
All BKF users agree not to post any derogatory/racist/or sexist remarks. This includes attachments, links and all information contained within posts, signatures, and avatars, failure to comply with this rule will result in a permanent ban.

All BKF users agree not to post any copyrighted or trademarked information without the express written permission of the owner(s) / proper citation of source.

All BKF users agree not to post any real names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, social security numbers, or any other personal details (their own or other people's).

All BKF users agree not to post links, pictures, attachments, videos, or the like of pornographic content, objectionable material or extreme violence, whether cartoon or real.

All BKF users agree not to use BKF for advertising purposes without a written contract between yourself/company/agent and the administration of BKF. Blatant advertising will result in a ban.

All BKF users agree not to spam the forums. Spam includes but is not limited to posting erroneous, non-relevant-useless, off-topic, or meaningless posts. Spam may also include posts which contain no text, or large areas of blank space between lines. Simply posting emoticons without text is considered spam. BKF is the largest bankruptcy message board and all the content is intended to help other users. Please help us improve the quality of our forum by making sure that your posts are well-worded, spell checked, grammatically correct and syntaxed.

Regarding actions of moderators and administrators:

The forum is no place to air out your opinion or be judgmental of our staff and its capabilities.

All BKF users agree not to abuse or mistreat moderators or administrators. It is against BKF rules to post any information regarding bans or any other action taken by a member of the moderating or administrative team. If you wish to discuss bans or warnings please do so via PM. To place a complaint against a moderator, send a PM to a super moderator. All Moderators are equal, any decision made by a moderator must be adhered to. If a moderator tells you something you do not like, do not go to another moderator looking for a different answer. If you are caught doing this you will be banned. The moderators work as a team and respect the decisions made by their peers and will help enforce them unless an administrator tells them differently.
If you have an issue with how the forum is run, then notify one of our administrator and we will look into the situation. We have in the past and still do appreciate any input that you offer this forum. But critical input and/or judgmental postings towards the staff will result in you getting banned.


Should you find a thread offensive or out of line, then notify a Mod in a PM so they can evaluate the situation and do the action deemed necessary.

All moderators do have active "other" lives outside of the forum and help moderate this forum in their spare time throughout the days and weeks.

If you have a problem with a member or Mod follow the proper channels of reporting it.

BKF reserves the right to delete any posts which contain anti-BKF comments or discussion. Any bashing of moderators or administrators, or any of their discussion or actions will also be deleted, and the responsible posting party(s) will be banned. Any public anti-BKF advertising, communication, or posts on another forum will result in permanent bans as well.

All warnings and bans are decided by individual moderators and administrators. Warnings are preferable to bans however, for serious offenses and repeat abusers bans will go into effect. The length of the bans can vary from several hours to permanent.

All messages posted or sent including through PM are the property of BKforum.com.

All BKF users agree not to advertiser on the forum (Niether by posting, private messaging or using your signature). If you are a company/attorney/legal adviser wishing to advertise on the site or sell a product, you must contact the head administrator and inquire about our advertising packages.

All bankruptcy related opinions expressed on BKForum.com are those of their authors and not necessarily of BKF, its staff or representatives.

You agree not to copy any material/post/content from BKF without written permission from our head administrator .

By posting on this forum you agree to these terms and conditions, including any punishment deemed appropriate by moderators or administrators in the event of an offense.

Administrators/Moderators can change these rules at any time without prior notice.
See more
See less

Adversary/Pro Se

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Adversary/Pro Se

    Hi!

    So, I owe about $175K in student loans, $28K of which are private. Am current with loans (was continually deferring feds or paying $50/m). I was discharged from Ch.7 in Sept'10 and we filed an adversary proceeding to try & eliminate or reduce my student loan debt. I have a good job but really earn as much as I'm going to & never intended to support a family of 4 on 1 income: husband long-term unemployed (construction), 2 young kids.

    SO, we settled with the privates (41%: payments of $100/m for 10 years). We had a similar agreement with DOE (41% over 15 years)- then DOE has new people/new policy and will apparently only settle for medical cases only.

    I don't foresee my economic situation changing any time soon- even when (if?) husband finds employment- we have no savings, need to buy a 2nd car (he's borrowing a 20-year-old truck) which means car payment (even if older), more insurance, gas, deferred maintenance on home (renting isn't cheaper than owning in our situation) and my payments would be $800/m for 30 years, which is obviously crazy.

    SO, now that DOE won't settle, case is set for trial. But I can't afford a trial & we really don't know how the Judge will rule which makes trial super risky-- there was precedent for dismissing/reducing but now there are lots of new judges & no recent cases on point.

    So, my atty recommends proceeding pro se. I'd only have to do the trial brief (fine) and the kicker is, of course, representing myself. Which gives me a bit of a heart attack- I mean I guess I can observe some AP proceedings. I'm getting an electronic copy of all my files and the ironic twist is that I am an atty but I don't do trial work/litigate.

    Anyhow, anyone here initiated an AP on student loans successfully? Any pro se? Any tips?

  • #2
    I think there was one person. A pro se case against the Department of Education is going to be a tough one. They get to use the United States Attorney for representation. They will fight just for the sake of sending a message. You may have to conduct a trial as well, take depositions, be deposed yourself, and bring experts to testify for you.

    Now that I've scared you... you can present your case. Search this forum for threads about discharging student debt through an adversary proceeding. There are hurdles and you will need to prove, through evidence and expert testimony, that you'd never ever in your lifetime be able to repay your loans. Given the reduction already given in the private student loans, that may become a more difficult hurdle since you and your spouse are capable of employment, and are employed.

    I believe the other person was tobee43, but the case was fact specific. The school where tobee43 accumulated her loans closed. I don't have any other details.
    Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
    Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
    Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog


    I am not an attorney. Any advice provided is not legal advice.

    Comment


    • #3
      Here is an AP from here in Western Washington - couple had huge loans but had reached their highest level of employment with the education they have - had 2 kids etc. and they won!!

      https://ecf.wawb.uscourts.gov/cgi-bi..._doc?77,455677

      Hope this is somewhat helpful. Good luck!!
      ~~ Filed Over Median Income Chapter 7: 12/17/2010 ~~ 341 Held: 1/12/2011 ~~ Discharged: 03/16/2011 ~~
      Not an attorney - just an opinionated woman.

      Comment


      • #4
        Valley, I thought there was a similar case from California as well where one was a deputy sheriff... or I was thinking of that Washington case. Again, the Washington case is fact specific with over $320K owed on student loans and the debtors, with children being unable to do anything with their combined $5K/month "net" salary.
        Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
        Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
        Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog


        I am not an attorney. Any advice provided is not legal advice.

        Comment


        • #5
          Hey, JB, I *think* the deputy was a CA case, too. I am gonna look again in a bit.

          The couple in this case I referenced did have a HUGE amount of student loan debt - I need to re-read it soon. But at least this judge was logical in considering their case - I really admired a lot of her thought processes. I threw it out to the OP since she seems to have topped out in employment for her degree (similar to the couple in this case), it's a WA case and that most of all that maybe she could glean some helpful info from the references to other cases in it.
          ~~ Filed Over Median Income Chapter 7: 12/17/2010 ~~ 341 Held: 1/12/2011 ~~ Discharged: 03/16/2011 ~~
          Not an attorney - just an opinionated woman.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hi all- thanks for the responses & case link. I heard Overstreet was sympathetic. Ch current judge is new to the bench & hasn't ruled on this issue. I am at my highest earning & husband's industry gone, no higher Ed. Already did a depo this summer & no income changes since then (or filing BK in 5/10 or discharge 9/10). I figuredi don't have a ton to lose @ this point b/c DOE will let you pay$50/m forever & sadly figure I'll just be paying until I die

            Comment


            • #7
              I just want to say that Judge Overstreet is a godsend....I'm thinking there may be hope for us yet...to the OP adm - old chap (or old girl) GO FOR IT - what have you got to loose...except your chains!!!!!!

              Comment

              Unconfigured Ad Widget

              Collapse
              Working...
              X