top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

HELP! Quiet Title Action Versus Imminent Eviction

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    HELP! Quiet Title Action Versus Imminent Eviction

    Here's a question for JB and Des, and any attorneys that wish to jump in:

    So I may have a claim for adverse possession in WA, by occupying a house for 10 years. The owner is trying to evict me. I've filed the Quiet Title Action in state court. What defenses do I have? If the "Landlord" attempts to file a motion to lift the automatic stay, can I file an Opposition to the Motion stating that the property is part of my bankruptcy estate with the pending lawsuit? Also, what happens to property acquired after filing a 13?

    In the alternative, is it possible to have an eviction Unlawful Detainer lawsuit consolidated or stayed with the preceding Quiet Title Action? And would this be grounds for an Adversary Proceeding against the Landlord if I legally have claim to the property? This case is complicated and I don't have any money for legal counsel. Any thoughts / insights are greatly appreciated, before I find myself out on the street. Thanks in advance.

    #2
    Quite title/adverse possession/eviction - can't assist on this. Not my area.

    After acquired property is property of a Chapter 13 estate. See 11 USC 1306. If the property is not exempt, unsecured creditors will need to be compensated for its value.

    Des.

    Comment


      #3
      What I learned in the process of attempting this….. you must meet the criteria of: 1) continuous use WITHOUT the owners knowledge or permission. What were the circumstances if your originally moving in? Was the place apparently abandon and you moved in? 10 years without the owner ever checking on it.?

      also, I understand in some states it us 20 years not 10

      perhaps you could look this up in your own state’s statutes​​​​​​.

      Comment


        #4
        Originally posted by despritfreya View Post
        After acquired property is property of a Chapter 13 estate. See 11 USC 1306. If the property is not exempt, unsecured creditors will need to be compensated for its value.
        What Des wrote is the downside to this. If the property is worth $$$ and you owe the unsecured creditors $$$ then you would need to pay that Chapter 7 liquidation value into the plan. So many issues... and I have nothing more than that to say.

        Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
        Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
        Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog

        Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.

        Comment

        bottom Ad Widget

        Collapse
        Working...
        X