top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Inheritance

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • justbroke
    replied
    Originally posted by shadowb View Post
    In my case my ex has already done some shady things with his chapter 13. He wasn't 100% forthcoming in his equipment to the trustee.
    In many States, tools of the trade are exempt (period). So it wouldn't matter that he left out a few tools and equipment.

    Originally posted by shadowb View Post
    In my ex's case, he got into the 13 not because he was forced to financially, but because he neglected some IRS debt that he had and he didn't want to give up his precious tools and trailers and machinery that he had purchased instead of paying the IRS.
    That's the definition of being forced into Chapter 13. Chapter 13 is perfectly suited to save property and/or stave off liens and levies from the IRS. IRS enforcement is through levies, and your ex's case is exactly a "financially" forced event.

    Originally posted by shadowb View Post
    He took a walk on the house (quit paying the mortgage payments) and it is going to foreclosure (trustee got upset about that) and is now trying to convince the trustee that our RV is NOT a luxury item but now his home.
    An RV and maybe even a "van" can be considered your residence in most States and definitely under federal exemption law.

    In many cases, ex-spouses, family members, former business partners and the like cause nothing but trouble in a case. Sometimes the Trustee is frustrated with EVERYONE involved.

    Leave a comment:


  • shadowb
    replied
    In my case my ex has already done some shady things with his chapter 13. He wasn't 100% forthcoming in his equipment to the trustee. I know for awhile we thought the trustee was going to kick him out because he was SOOOO behind. In my ex's case, he got into the 13 not because he was forced to financially, but because he neglected some IRS debt that he had and he didn't want to give up his precious tools and trailers and machinery that he had purchased instead of paying the IRS. When we were in the 13 together, the trustee was quite frustrated with him, and I do know (because I still get copies since I have a DSO filed with his 13 that was for arrearages) that the trustee has been going round and round with him on our RV. He took a walk on the house (quit paying the mortgage payments) and it is going to foreclosure (trustee got upset about that) and is now trying to convince the trustee that our RV is NOT a luxury item but now his home. She also has been frustrated with him with his job situation. He has been spending more time not working and is taking jobs with less pay to drop his income and he doesn't stay up with his BK13 payments. It is all just a crazy mess. And, I am very glad that I am no longer in the mess with him. I filed my BK7 and am done and have been able to put all that behind and no longer have to go to BK court. He on the other hand continues to go.

    Leave a comment:


  • shadowb
    replied
    Thanks for the reply, justbroke. I really appreciate it.

    Leave a comment:


  • espo1357
    replied
    Originally posted by justbroke View Post
    Not that I can add to what's been said, but there is too much noise. In any event, the poster should report to their attorney. In your particular State, death benefits may be exempt, and this is why it "may" not matter that you received an inheritance. Always consult your attorney when anything happens with your finances over the life of your Chapter 13 plan.

    There's nothing else to say or speculate about.
    Personally, I have done nothing but tell the truth in court and you are absolutey correct in your opinion.

    However, if it is a grey area, then personally I am not going to report it. Furthermore, I am going to find information from good legal counsel, and find out the best course to take while in the 13 and getting an inheritance or getting a better job, etc.

    They just have so much control over our lives in the 13, and the 13 is not a bargain at all in the first place. So let them do the research on it and spend the money if they want to dig. My "bet" is that they are not going to do it.

    Leave a comment:


  • justbroke
    replied
    Not that I can add to what's been said, but there is too much noise. In any event, the poster should report to their attorney. In your particular State, death benefits may be exempt, and this is why it "may" not matter that you received an inheritance. Always consult your attorney when anything happens with your finances over the life of your Chapter 13 plan.

    There's nothing else to say or speculate about.

    Leave a comment:


  • shadowb
    replied
    I am just curious. My ex who is a snake in the grass was just awarded a portion of an insurance reimbursement refund to the tune of $3000. I was on the 13 with him. He had an affair and abandoned me and a few months later didn't waste any time to hire another BK attorney and had me kicked off the plan with him. Because I was a stay at home mom, working part-time I didn't financially qualify to stay in so was forced out into a 7. He had filed for the divorce immediately on the date of abandonment (actually a few days prior) and blindsided me. I know that is irrelevant, but the bottom line was he was granted a portion of reimbursement that I was receiving from the insurance company. A friend of mine who came out of a 7 told me that she thought that someone in a 13 couldn't receive funds like that and had to report them to the trustee. My ex probably won't report it. Is there a way that the trustee will find out about it if he doesn't report it?

    Leave a comment:


  • espo1357
    replied
    To be safe, you should report it.

    But, if I got one...well...there are options. I hope I don't get it while in the 13, but there are options....

    Options are good, very good...then again "its hip to be square", right?

    Leave a comment:


  • systemslt
    replied
    you spent the money.


    if they find out your in trouble. if you tell them your in trouble.


    taking few more days to think about what to do wont make a difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • walkthaplank
    replied
    If there were an inheritance or life insurance payout, how would the trustee find out?

    We've read the "run it by your attorney" posts, but in a practical sense how would the trustee find out about a payout of this sort, especially if it were under some sort of IRS threshold?

    Leave a comment:


  • tobee43
    replied
    [
    QUOTE=LadyInTheRed;441537]To clarrify, my statements about tax apply to Federal tax and CA tax. I don't know a lot about taxes imposed by other states.
    it varies from state to state...i have worked with estates from calif. while the clients i worked were residence of other states. taxes were not removed but were left up to the person who rec'd money's. california did not withhold. why...i have not a clue.




    Not sure what you are getting at here, so I won't comment.
    there are different sources of where the assets or monies that are inherited come from...and each is handled in a different mannor. such as the example of the life insurance monies distribution and how it works. tax wise.


    The OP received an inheritance 6 months ago. Unless the estate's personal representative filed fiduciary returns early, K-1s, if required, would be sent to beneficiaries next year.
    i missed that ,but see it now...i see that the OP is 2 years into the chapter 13 however, once again depending on the source of the income he or she will most likely not find a k-1 applicable if the amount is within the tax exempt guidelines.

    once again we are not getting all the information and a tax attorney would most likely know best for this individual. i would be more worried about reporting this directly to the trustee's office and the OP attorney then any tax ramifications...


    K-1's are also issued by estates. I see them all the time.
    once again depending on the source of where the monies come from in the estate and of the state where the person is paying tax. (being born and raised in calif. i know they tax everything!)...not so in many other states. i have only worked with 2 clients NOT from calif...but inherited FROM calif. they had to pay NO state taxes or federal due to the fact that each of those estates were both under 650k...(at that time...i'm certain the federal limits have changed by now). also, because a k-1 is issued it does not necessarily mean it is used when that person is doing their taxes.


    your client base may fall into those categories which i have listed prior. also, i'm certain you are aware that there are maximum limits exempt for many states as well as on the federal level. (most of our clients did not fall into that area taxwise).



    The OP has not provided sufficient information on which to base that opinion
    .


    correct...however, i would think it would be under the federal limits of taxation. but the amount was never mentioned. ( one would think if it was over the limit he or she would be counting their money and not hanging out here!) LOL!!!



    capital gain/loss incurred on a sale of assets by the estate that must be reported by a beneficiary are reported to the beneficiary on a K-1. In CA, state capital gains taxes are often withheld at the time of sale, so the personal representative has to file a fiduciary return to get a refund of any overpayment.
    this is somewhat interesting, and the basis of your answer may be correct, however, i'm going to disagree with you here. only because i handled this case from calif. the taxes were NOT held (it was quite large)...however, the reciprocate was responsible to pay at tax time....the firm i worked for stepped back. even more, interesting, the executor of the estate was a california based firm, they never held the tax because the property was still intact at the time of distribution. after the estate was released and the distributions done, the property was sold by the executor of the estate (a lawyer in the law firm...interesting?)...no taxes were held on the capital gain of that property. (it was hefty) however, the property WAS NOT sold until after the probate court released the estate.






    The first paragraph above discusses inheritance tax (basically the same thing as estate tax, but there may be some difference in who is responsible to pay the tax). The example in the second paragraph doesn't seem to be complete. If somebody received $120,000 from an estate and $100,000 represented principal that existed on the date of death and $20,000 was income earned on the principal after death, it is true that that $20,000 would be taxable income.
    it is complete...based on the 120k. just an example of what would have been considered taxable income. there is more to that story....as well. if the person rec'ing the 20k had no or little income for that year, then they would be tax exempt anyway. the amount of tax is added into their gross income and taxed accordingly.




    Absolutley. And if you have questions about income tax on your inheritance or estate/inheritance tax, talk to a CPA or estate planning/admin attorney.
    [/QUOTE]

    absolutely a MUST ....Lady...i do appreciate the dialogue and exhange...it helps prevent "brain fog".
    Last edited by tobee43; 08-19-2010, 05:56 AM. Reason: TYPOS R ME

    Leave a comment:


  • LadyInTheRed
    replied
    Originally posted by tobee43 View Post
    paying the tax usually depends on where you live, and your relationship to the deceased....
    To clarrify, my statements about tax apply to Federal tax and CA tax. I don't know a lot about taxes imposed by other states.

    Originally posted by tobee43 View Post
    or depending on whether the pay out was; for example......Life insurance proceeds..... paid to you, are used in the calculation of the gross estate and may be taxable....
    Not sure what you are getting at here, so I won't comment.

    Originally posted by tobee43
    if you have not rec'd a k-1 by now...chances are you will not.
    The OP received an inheritance 6 months ago. Unless the estate's personal representative filed fiduciary returns early, K-1s, if required, would be sent to beneficiaries next year.

    Originally posted by tobee43 View Post
    also... k-1 1065 are usually for business....Schedule K-1 is used to report a beneficiary's share of income, deductions, credits, and other items from pass-through entities. These generally include limited partnerships, S Corporations, income trusts, and limited liability companies....so one rarely sees them in this type of situation.
    K-1's are also issued by estates. I see them all the time.


    Originally posted by tobee43 View Post
    federaly taxes you should be fine.....
    The OP has not provided sufficient information on which to base that opinion.

    Originally posted by tobee43 View Post
    i have also worked with people who indeed did have to pay on much less amount because the source of the inhert. funds came from property...which was sold and they had to pay taxes on the capital gain...(LOL...they actually inhert. the Capital GAIN!!).
    capital gain/loss incurred on a sale of assets by the estate that must be reported by a beneficiary are reported to the beneficiary on a K-1. In CA, state capital gains taxes are often withheld at the time of sale, so the personal representative has to file a fiduciary return to get a refund of any overpayment.


    Originally posted by tobee43 View Post
    Inheritance Tax Basis

    "The first step used to determine any inheritance tax that might be due is to calculate the fair market value of the entire estate. This would include cash, bank accounts, stocks and bonds, real state, insurance, and similar items of value. The total fair market value of all these items is termed the Gross Estate".


    i.e. In this example, you are receiving a total of 12 x $10,000 or $120,000, which is $20,000 higher than the lump sum of $100,000. This means that you would need to pay income tax on the $20,000 received in the form of interest income.
    The first paragraph above discusses inheritance tax (basically the same thing as estate tax, but there may be some difference in who is responsible to pay the tax). The example in the second paragraph doesn't seem to be complete. If somebody received $120,000 from an estate and $100,000 represented principal that existed on the date of death and $20,000 was income earned on the principal after death, it is true that that $20,000 would be taxable income.

    Originally posted by tobee43 View Post
    really do yourself a favor..... if you are in chapter 13 run this by your attorney..

    only because it could come back to bite you...like the trustee could want to reclaim those funds for distribution. (if it was found out somehow).
    Absolutley. And if you have questions about income tax on your inheritance or estate/inheritance tax, talk to a CPA or estate planning/admin attorney.

    Leave a comment:


  • tobee43
    replied
    i agree with that....absolutely...it would have been the first thing i would have done!

    Leave a comment:


  • $$only4ever
    replied
    OP should still run it by his attorney. Attorneys do not like surprises.

    Leave a comment:


  • tobee43
    replied
    yes, i'm not really thinking there is anything to worry about here...however, we all have a tendency to worry all the time now!

    but ALWAYS better to be safe than sorry!

    Leave a comment:


  • $$only4ever
    replied
    I was 2 years into my chapter 13 when I received an inheritance of $10k. I contacted my attorney who contacted the trustee. I never heard a word from either my attorney or the trustee. I finished out my 3 years and was discharged and never had to give the money up.

    Leave a comment:

bottom Ad Widget

Collapse
Working...
X