Originally posted by Pandora
View Post
1. My comment about objecting to the 2nd must be taken in context. In my State, since the anti deficiency statute precludes personal liability and the PMSI 2nd is nothing more than a split of the original loan, there can be no unsecured claim as such would mean "personal liability". However, I only make an issue of this if the Plan is close to or suppose to be a 100% payback. If not 100% then I really do not care who gets the $$ so I let it slide.
2. In your situation you refied the PMSI 2nd. If this was my State I would use my argument since, so long as the refi matches the PMSI 2nd exactly, it is completely traceable to the purchase of the home. However, I have never dealt with this specific set of facts.
3. As it relates to your Plan there is a simple way to determine if you are paying 100% or something less. Pull the claims docket off PACER. Add all of the unsecured claims up, (if your 2nd filed a secured claim, but did not amend it to unsecured status, it should not be counted in the mix), add to that what ever else is to be paid (auto + interest, attny fees, taxes, mortgage arrears) then add to that total the Trustee's fee (use between 8 and 10% as I do not know the exact percentage). See what that comes to as compared to the total Plan funding.
Des.
Leave a comment: