On my chapter 13 papers I got from my lawyer it says one of the questions the trustee will ask is have you transfered any property worth more than $5000 in the last 6 years. So does this mean property like a musical instrument sold for say $500 is ok? I live in SC.
top Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Chapter 13 trustee question
Collapse
X
-
They are really looking for Real and other "personal" property which you may have tried to hide. If the note reads greater than "$5,000", a $500 instrument would not need to be reported.Last edited by justbroke; 06-05-2013, 11:00 AM.Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
-
It's just what somebody decided would be significant enought to pursue.Originally posted by Christine88 View PostI'm curious about the $5000 thing. Where do they get that?LadyInTheRed is in the black!
Filed Chap 13 April 2010. Discharged May 2015.
$143,000 in debt discharged for $36,500, including attorneys fees. Money well spent!
Comment
-
It must be a threshold number for your Attorney or the Trustees in your District. Going after a $500 item is typically not worth the time and effort. Going after an improperly "transferred" item (property) valued over $5,000 could be worth it.Originally posted by Christine88 View PostI'm curious about the $5000 thing. Where do they get that?Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
musical instrument in SC is exempt property so they couldn't pursue it regardless.Originally posted by justbroke View PostIt must be a threshold number for your Attorney or the Trustees in your District. Going after a $500 item is typically not worth the time and effort. Going after an improperly "transferred" item (property) valued over $5,000 could be worth it.
Comment
-
It's not that simple. Musical instruments are covered along with clothing and "household" furnishings under a sort of "everything else" category. That category only has a $4,500 exemption limit.** This may be why your attorney mentioned $5,000 as a benchmark. If you transferred a Stradivarius, I'm sure the Trustee would be interested in determining whether you received fair market value (FMV) and then, where all the money went.Originally posted by Christine88 View Postmusical instrument in SC is exempt property so they couldn't pursue it regardless.
** source of South Carolina's bankruptcy exemptions from Legal Consumer http://www.legalconsumer.com/bankruptcy/bankruptcy-law.php?ST=SCChapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
SC has a wildcard exemption of $5625. Couldn't that be applied to the personal property exemption category?Originally posted by justbroke View PostIt's not that simple. Musical instruments are covered along with clothing and "household" furnishings under a sort of "everything else" category. That category only has a $4,500 exemption limit.** This may be why your attorney mentioned $5,000 as a benchmark. If you transferred a Stradivarius, I'm sure the Trustee would be interested in determining whether you received fair market value (FMV) and then, where all the money went.
Comment
-
Yes. You would use your wildcard once you exhaust another category.Originally posted by Christine88 View PostSC has a wildcard exemption of $5625. Couldn't that be applied to the personal property exemption category?
Always try to use the exact exemption category before exhausting your wildcard.Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
-
It depends on which California "system" that you use. Under California System II, you get to use the "unused" portion of the homestead exemption. It is quite generous. Of course, you need to really look at what you need to exempt and if you have property with equity, System I may be better. That is why Californians need to examine what they can protect under both systems to determine which is better.Originally posted by dmc-2008 View PostDoes California have a wildcard?Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog
Any advice provided is not legal advice, but simply the musings of a fellow bankrupt.
Comment
bottom Ad Widget
Collapse
Bankruptcy Wizard
Comment