Hello All
First post here at BK Forum - be kind.
I thought I read somewhere here on this board that if you had a on-going garnishment, then file BK with the automotic stays the granishment stop, but if you are garnished by error the creditor has to pay you back - is that true?
My garnishment started with my 10.14.2010 check, I am paid bi-weekly. I was able to file 11.12.2010 which meant they got $$ on my 10.14 and 10.28 checks but for some reason I wasn't granished on 11.11, but I was then granishment started again on the 11.25 check.
If it is true that if you are garnished in error (after filing BK 7), shouldn't I be owed the $$ from my 11.25 check?
First post here at BK Forum - be kind.
I thought I read somewhere here on this board that if you had a on-going garnishment, then file BK with the automotic stays the granishment stop, but if you are garnished by error the creditor has to pay you back - is that true?
My garnishment started with my 10.14.2010 check, I am paid bi-weekly. I was able to file 11.12.2010 which meant they got $$ on my 10.14 and 10.28 checks but for some reason I wasn't granished on 11.11, but I was then granishment started again on the 11.25 check.
If it is true that if you are garnished in error (after filing BK 7), shouldn't I be owed the $$ from my 11.25 check?
Closed November 2010
They didn't get anything from bank- account closed - they got the wages and I can only assume they would have gotten the refund if I didn't file BK
. Funny thing is the release for the tax refund stated that it would refund anything collected from 10.28.2010 forward - I didn't file till 11.12.2010, I wonder if it works the same for wages cuz then I would get two refunds.
Comment