Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!) (updated: 04/28/2015)

Welcome to the Bankruptcy Forum. Bankruptcy (BK) Forum is known as and will be referred to as BKF hereinafter. In order to ensure a long term success of our vibrant community, we have established certain rules and guidelines to which everyone must adhere to. Please take your time to carefully read our rules, before you start to participate in the community.

Things you agree to do: (BKF) users agree to use the search function before starting a new thread. This prevents duplicate discussions and allows for better organized topics.

All BKF users agree to read the sticky posts which may be available at the top of a forum page. These Sticky posts often contain valuable information. They may also outline more rules and guidelines specific for that particular forum, stickies are put in place by that forums moderator(s) or admin(s).

Things you agree not to do:

All BKF users agree not to call people names or write a post simply to make a personal attack, or get a negative reaction; this behavior is not allowed on our forum. The use of derogatory language aimed at anyone will be severely dealt with. There is no need to agree with each other, or to even like each other. However, by signing onto you agree to treat each member and guest with the respect they deserve. No threats or personal attacks will be allowed.

All BKF users agree not to discuss, engage, or encourage any behavior or activity which violates the law. Discussion of drugs, violence, murder, theft, vandalism, fraud or any other issue which could be used to help individuals break the law is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to "bump" old threads, unless there is a specific benefit to the community by doing so. But in most cases, please don't post in very old threads, instead start new threads.

All BKF users agree not to attempt/use another members account. It is against BKF rules to use any account other than your own. Impersonating another member will result in an immediate ban. It is also against the rules to open more than one account in your own name without permission from a moderator or administrator. If you have been banned for any reason, it is against the rules to open another account. If you were banned temporarily and you are caught using another account you will be banned permanently. Choosing a moniker which is similar in either sound or spelling as a moderator or administrator is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to private message any moderator, admin, or other member with questions related to their personal circumstances (Questions about the forum or issues with the forum are ok). This forum only works when members share their experience and insights with everyone.

Things you agree not to post:
All BKF users agree not to post any derogatory/racist/or sexist remarks. This includes attachments, links and all information contained within posts, signatures, and avatars, failure to comply with this rule will result in a permanent ban.

All BKF users agree not to post any copyrighted or trademarked information without the express written permission of the owner(s) / proper citation of source.

All BKF users agree not to post any real names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, social security numbers, or any other personal details (their own or other people's).

All BKF users agree not to post links, pictures, attachments, videos, or the like of pornographic content, objectionable material or extreme violence, whether cartoon or real.

All BKF users agree not to use BKF for advertising purposes without a written contract between yourself/company/agent and the administration of BKF. Blatant advertising will result in a ban.

All BKF users agree not to spam the forums. Spam includes but is not limited to posting erroneous, non-relevant-useless, off-topic, or meaningless posts. Spam may also include posts which contain no text, or large areas of blank space between lines. Simply posting emoticons without text is considered spam. BKF is the largest bankruptcy message board and all the content is intended to help other users. Please help us improve the quality of our forum by making sure that your posts are well-worded, spell checked, grammatically correct and syntaxed.

Regarding actions of moderators and administrators:

The forum is no place to air out your opinion or be judgmental of our staff and its capabilities.

All BKF users agree not to abuse or mistreat moderators or administrators. It is against BKF rules to post any information regarding bans or any other action taken by a member of the moderating or administrative team. If you wish to discuss bans or warnings please do so via PM. To place a complaint against a moderator, send a PM to a super moderator. All Moderators are equal, any decision made by a moderator must be adhered to. If a moderator tells you something you do not like, do not go to another moderator looking for a different answer. If you are caught doing this you will be banned. The moderators work as a team and respect the decisions made by their peers and will help enforce them unless an administrator tells them differently.
If you have an issue with how the forum is run, then notify one of our administrator and we will look into the situation. We have in the past and still do appreciate any input that you offer this forum. But critical input and/or judgmental postings towards the staff will result in you getting banned.

Should you find a thread offensive or out of line, then notify a Mod in a PM so they can evaluate the situation and do the action deemed necessary.

All moderators do have active "other" lives outside of the forum and help moderate this forum in their spare time throughout the days and weeks.

If you have a problem with a member or Mod follow the proper channels of reporting it.

BKF reserves the right to delete any posts which contain anti-BKF comments or discussion. Any bashing of moderators or administrators, or any of their discussion or actions will also be deleted, and the responsible posting party(s) will be banned. Any public anti-BKF advertising, communication, or posts on another forum will result in permanent bans as well.

All warnings and bans are decided by individual moderators and administrators. Warnings are preferable to bans however, for serious offenses and repeat abusers bans will go into effect. The length of the bans can vary from several hours to permanent.

All messages posted or sent including through PM are the property of

All BKF users agree not to advertiser on the forum (Niether by posting, private messaging or using your signature). If you are a company/attorney/legal adviser wishing to advertise on the site or sell a product, you must contact the head administrator and inquire about our advertising packages.

All bankruptcy related opinions expressed on are those of their authors and not necessarily of BKF, its staff or representatives.

You agree not to copy any material/post/content from BKF without written permission from our head administrator .

By posting on this forum you agree to these terms and conditions, including any punishment deemed appropriate by moderators or administrators in the event of an offense.

Administrators/Moderators can change these rules at any time without prior notice.
See more
See less

Consumer agency threatens independence of bankruptcy office

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Consumer agency threatens independence of bankruptcy office

    September 10, 2013

    Serious allegations are being raised in the legal community that the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has recruited the U.S. Trustee Program to collect bankruptcy data on its behalf to aid a controversial data-mining program.

    Documents obtained by the Washington Examiner describe efforts by the CFPB to collect a decade's worth of private financial data on the consumer behavior of five million American citizens without their knowledge or consent. The CFPB data-mining campaign has alarmed privacy watchdogs.

    The USTP was created by Congress in 1978 to be a rigorously neutral agency within the U.S. Department of Justice. Its attorneys are supposed to be "impartial” and to serve as a “watchdog over the bankruptcy process,” according to the agency's website.

    If USTP is aiding CFPB’s data-mining program in any manner, bankruptcy authorities argue it would constitute an “unprecedented” violation of the organization's reason for being and destroy its independence.

    Officials with CFPB and USTP were reluctant to respond to questions about their agencies' relationship and the data-mining program.

    Concerns were first sparked on May 11, 2012, when USTP attorney J. Steven Wilkes filed an unusual discovery request before the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Tampa, Fla.

    Citing a small number of Florida-based bankruptcy cases filed before the court, Wilkes asked for millions of unrelated bankruptcy files nationwide that were in the possession of Morgan Drexen, a California-based administrative-support company serving more than 100 bankruptcy lawyers.

    Wilkes asked for all Morgan Drexen cases in its system from Jan. 1, 2008, for Chapter, 7, 11, 12 or 13 proceedings, where the company “was at any time assisting an attorney for a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding.”

    Although filed in the Region 21 bankruptcy court, Wilkes' request covered the entire United States.

    In its reply, the Costa Mesa-based company argued that the request was beyond the regional bankruptcy court's jurisdiction because Wilkes “seeks the production of documents and other items relating to any bankruptcy case, presumably pending in any court in the United States.”

    The company argued the request was “overbroad” and “well beyond the relevancy of the matters at issue in this case.” In June 2012, the company asked federal Bankruptcy Judge Caryl E. Delano to issue a “protective order” against the request.

    Last November, the judge agreed with Morgan Drexen. She sharply limited the U.S. Trustee’s access to files for only seven Florida bankruptcy cases.

    Both CFPB and Morgan Drexen are now battling through competing lawsuits before federal courts in Washington, D.C., and in California.

    The Wilkes request raised serious issues about the USTP’s independence and whether CFPB is trying to politicize the judicial program so it can do the bureau’s the bidding on data mining, according to bankruptcy and constitutional law experts.

    Steven M. Berman, a Florida-based bankruptcy attorney for Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, which represents Morgan Drexen in Florida, said Wilkes' request has caused legal alarms to go off outside the bankruptcy court.

    Berman said he was initially confused by Wilkes’ far-reaching request, but on further reflection wondered if it might be on behalf of CFPB.

    “I do remember Steven telling me something about ‘other agencies are interested or involved or looking into this’ when we had our discussions,” Berman said.

    Berman’s suspicions were confirmed by a July 18, 2012, email from Wilkes that noted a separate CFPB request for documents and said his office would be interested in receiving documents that “will be produced to the CFPB.”

    “Yeah, that’s pretty unusual,” Berman said of Wilkes' reference in the email to CFPB. “I’ve been a bankruptcy lawyer for 23 years. I don’t think I’ve ever had that experience.”

    A month before Wilkes filed his motion before the bankruptcy court, CFPB had started a “nonpublic law enforcement investigation” against Morgan Drexen.

    On April 13, 2011, CFPB requested all of the company’s internal business documents and its document management database “in which Morgan Drexen has electronic records relating to Debt Settlement.”

    Morgan Drexen executives estimate the CFPB request involves millions of private documents of financially distressed Americans. The company is a software storage company that holds the documents for bankruptcy lawyers.

    Berman said Wilkes' wide-ranging request clearly suggested cooperation between USTP and CFPB. “Once I saw the things that were being requested, it made sense that he wasn’t just asking for the U.S. Trustee Program because the things he was asking for were beyond their statutory jurisdiction.”

    Donald A. Workman, a bankruptcy attorney for the law firm of Baker Hostettler, said the Wilkes request was unlike anything in his experience.

    “I find that undertaking to be very unusual and not anything I can recall seeing remotely similar in my career,” said Workman, who was chairman of the District of Columbia Bar's bankruptcy committee for two years.

    One of the reasons CFPB may have targeted Morgan Drexen is that Section 1027(e) of the Dodd-Frank Act that created the agency bars it from regulating lawyers practicing law.

    Morgan Drexen isn’t a law firm, but, as a repository of files for lawyers, it could serve as a loophole to obtain attorney files.

    Workman said a convenient way to gain access to the files is to use the USTP to seek the documents in the bankruptcy system.

    “This is another agency looking to noodle around in people’s privacy,” he said. “One way they do that they found is to come into bankruptcy court and attempt to get all of this information that is really is extraterritorial to this agency and the U.S. Trustee."

    A former federal bankruptcy judge who asked not to be named said USTP should never collect data for other agencies. “Doing the bidding of another government agency would be inconsistent with the mission of the U.S. Trustee’s role.”

    A practicing bankruptcy attorney who once served as a trial lawyer for the USTP said a broad request like Wilkes' was highly unusual and could unleash major privacy concerns.

    “The thing that strikes me there’s got to be a lot of privileged information in that data and that I don’t know how that’s released wholesale,” said the official who requested anonymity because his firm, which specializes in bankruptcy proceedings, often works with the USTP.

    Workman said if USTP is working for CFPB, it could undermine its integrity. “I think it could adversely affect the integrity of the U.S. Trustee’s office.”

    Wilkes declined to comment.

    Jane Limprecht, a USTP spokesman, said that in the Morgan Drexen case, “The U.S. Trustee does not represent the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.”

    However, when asked if Wilkes had any direct contact with CFPB, she refused to respond, saying “we don’t comment on cases beyond the information on the public record.”

    When asked if CFPB had any contact with USTP on the Morgan Drexen case, CFPB spokesman Michelle Person declined to comment, saying “we do not comment on pending litigation.”

    Tom Fitton, president of the nonprofit government watchdog group Judicial Watch, which obtained the original CFPB data-mining documents under the Freedom of Information Act, said the agency was “out of control.”

    Share this article on Facebook or Twitter

    Last edited by AngelinaCat; 09-10-2013, 09:56 PM.
    Lawyer - $3000
    Filing fee - $299
    Fresh Start - Priceless

  • #2
    Originally posted by jst4f View Post
    Interesting article on the latest Washington effort to pry into ever bodies lives. Looking for spending habits of Americans that have filed BK, est 5 million American. Now I admit that BK filings are public information, but this seems a little excessive. See article:
    well, that is certainly spooky!! a good read! thanks!
    8/4/2008 MAKE SURE AND VISIT Tobee's Blogs! and all are welcome to bk forum's Florida State Questions and Answers on BK


    • #3
      I, for one, have nothing to hide. I don't care who has access to data concerning my financial history, because - it's history!


      • #4
        Originally posted by kornellred View Post
        I, for one, have nothing to hide. I don't care who has access to data concerning my financial history, because - it's history!
        Yes kornell, I see your point, but think about this, "The camel's nose under the tent" if they can get this info, then that info, then watch you in real time, nobody will be safe and your privacy is breached. I believe this is already happening far beyond what we know. I feel my business belongs to me, not the government or anyone else. We have too much of "big brother" society already. 'Hub
        If I knew it all, would I be here?? Hang in there = Retained attorney 8-06, Filed 12-28-07, Discharge 8-13-08, Finally CLOSED 11-3-09, 3-31-10 AP Dismissed, Informed by incompetent lawyer of CLOSED status, October 14, 2010.


        Unconfigured Ad Widget