top Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

60 Minutes Report: Credit Reporting Agencies

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    60 Minutes Report: Credit Reporting Agencies

    This 60 Minutes report about credit reporting agencies was very interesting. In essence, the only way to get them to correct your report is to file a lawsuit against them in Federal court for violations of the FCRA.


    "Finally Judy Thomas took the only recourse available to her. She sued Equifax and TransUnion in federal court. And after a year-long battle, the credit reporting agencies settled for an undisclosed sum and promised to clean up her file.

    Steve Kroft: Did you think it was going to take a federal lawsuit?

    Judy Thomas: Heck no. It just takes a human being going, "Wow, this isn't Judith Kendall. Let me fix this." That's all they had to do.

    But as we discovered, that almost never happens."


    ....

    by Hickory416 February 10, 2013 8:10 PM EST
    I fought a reporting error by American Express for four years. It was only resolved when I took AMEX and the credit agencies, who fully acknowlged they understood the issue but sided with AMEX, to court and won. Amazingly, American Express did not correct the credit report information in compliance with the Judge's order. So the Judge called the AMEX attorney to court and suspended her law license until the problem was corrected. She explained that it was the leadership of the firm who did not comply, not her. The lesson, actually stated by the judge in the hearing, was" "next time go after the CEO of the firm in your complaint".






    Whether we like it or not, we live in an age where much of what goes on in our daily lives is monitored, collected and sold to interested parties -- our driving records, our medical history, our Internet traffic and, most importantly, our credit information.

    A mistake on your credit report can cost you money. It can increase the interest you pay on loans, prevent you from getting a mortgage or buying a car, landing a job or getting a security clearance. Its not uncommon. A new government study to be released tomorrow indicates as many as 40 million Americans have a mistake on their credit report. Twenty million have significant mistakes.

    And our own investigation of the credit reporting industry shows that those mistakes can be nearly impossible to get removed from your record.

    To access a free credit report from each of the three national credit reporting agencies, click here
    For tips from The National Consumer Law Center on what to check in your credit report, click here
    To file a credit reporting complaint with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, a government agency that oversees the credit reporting industry, click here
    To read more about credit reporting errors from a Columbus Dispatch investigation, click here

    Consumer credit reporting is a four billion dollar a year industry dominated by three large companies: Experian, TransUnion and Equifax. They keep files on 200 million Americans and traffic in our financial reputations. They make their money gathering information from people we do business with and selling it to banks, merchants, insurance companies, and employers and they use it to make judgments on our creditworthiness and reliability. But now the reliability of the industry is being questioned in an 8-year Federal Trade Commission study to be released tomorrow. Jon Leibowitz is the chairman.

    Jon Leibowitz: Here's what we found. Some pretty troubling information. One out of five Americans has an error on their credit report. And one out of 10 has an error on their credit report that might lower their credit score.

    Steve Kroft: I'm trying to think of another industry where a 20 percent error rate would be acceptable. That's a pretty high error rate.

    Jon Leibowitz: It's a pretty high error rate.

    Mike DeWine: I think the more we look at this and the more the American people know about this, the madder they're going to get.

    Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine has opened his own investigation into the credit reporting industry which for years has blamed mistakes on banks and merchants that provide them with bad information. But DeWine argues that the fault lies with the industry for what he says are clear violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

    Steve Kroft: Do these companies have a legal responsibility to make sure that the information is accurate?

    Mike DeWine: The federal law says that if you believe that there is a mistake, you can go to them and they have an obligation to do a reasonable investigation. They're not doing a reasonable investigation. They're not doing an investigation at all.

    Every day, DeWine's office fields calls from desperate constituents who can't get the credit reporting agencies to answer their questions or correct mistakes on their report like paid bills listed as delinquent, closed accounts listed as open, and bad debts that belong to other people with similar names or social security numbers.

    Mike DeWine: The problem is not that they make mistakes. It's they won't fix the mistakes. It literally is like this-- you know, guy behind the curtain in "The Wizard of Oz." You really don't know what he's doing. It really is a secret operation that is so hard to crack.

    Eight million people a year file disputes about their credit report which usually requires a visit to the Experian, TransUnion or Equifax websites. They are primarily designed to sell you premium products, not resolve a dispute which was what I was trying to do. There's a toll-free number you can call which is likely to connect you to someone on a faraway continent.

    [Kevin at credit reporting agency: Thank you for calling. My name is Kevin. How may I help you?

    Steve Kroft: Where are you located?

    Kevin at credit reporting agency: India.

    Steve Kroft: India?]

    But regardless of where they are or who you talk to, they won't be much help.

    Steve Kroft: So, really, you can't do anything for me. I've just been talking to you for 15 minutes. I mean, the only thing you can do is to tell me to fill it out online.

    [Employee at credit reporting agency: Yes, Mr. Kroft.

    Steve Kroft: Okay, thank you.]

    Besides the toll-free number, they also give you a post office box address where you can send a letter and documents supporting your claim. In each case, it's extremely unlikely that anyone with the authority to resolve your dispute will ever actually see it.

    Ask Sandra Cortez, a California accountant, whose credit report confused her with an international drug trafficker. It took her five years to get it fixed.

    Or David Smith, a retired Army officer whose credit report listed a bankruptcy that wasn't his and triggered a foreclosure proceeding against his house in South Carolina. He is still dealing with the fallout.

    Or Judy Thomas, a trauma nurse with a horror story worthy of Hitchcock or Kafka.

    Judy Thomas: There's nobody to go to. There's nobody. You just keep making phone calls and you just keep writing disputes and you keep sending them your Social Security number. And they don't care.

    Thomas, who manages two medical centers near Cleveland, says it all began in 1999 when she went shopping for a new dress and applied for a store credit card to get a 15 percent discount. She was denied.

    Steve Kroft: Was that the first time you'd ever been denied credit?

    Judy Thomas: Yes, very first time.

    Steve Kroft: Ever?

    Judy Thomas: Ever, ever.

    But certainly not the last. It became a regular occurrence. The personal credit reports she got from Experian, TransUnion and Equifax were all clean, and without blemish. Yet she kept getting rejected and couldn't find out why.

    Judy Thomas: I would get a consumer report and it would look fine. I would go to the bank. And they would tell me, "Oh no, you have all this debt." But no one would tell me what was on there.

    Steve Kroft: They wouldn't tell you what the debt was? And they wouldn't give you a copy of the report that they had.

    Judy Thomas: No. No.

    It took Judy Thomas several years to discover what almost no one knows -- that the credit reports the agencies send to you are different than the ones that they sell to banks, merchants and mortgage brokers. And she only found that out when a loan officer left her file on his desk and walked out of the room.

    Steve Kroft: And what did you see?

    Judy Thomas: I saw debt from Utah Medical Center. I saw debt from a veterinarian clinic in Utah. I saw collections for a Judith Kendall.

    Steve Kroft: Judith Kendall, not Judy Thomas?

    Judy Thomas: Correct.

    Steve Kroft: What's going through your mind?

    Judy Thomas: What the hell's she doing on my credit report? What the hell is her debt doing on my credit report?

    Steve Kroft: You think this would be a fairly simple thing to get straightened out?

    Judy Thomas: You would think. You would think.

    Judy Thomas (in kitchen): This is my Judy Thomas versus Judith Kendall file.

    Instead it became a six-year battle with credit agencies, requiring box loads of correspondence to try and prove that she was Judy Thomas, not Judith Kendall, all to no avail.

    Steve Kroft: You got a lot of time invested in this. How important are these documents?

    Judy Thomas: It's my life.

    There are logs of daily phone calls to dispute centers, hundreds of letters to Experian, Equifax and TransUnion, even correspondence from Judith's Kendall's creditors in Utah, acknowledging that the debts on her credit report aren't hers.

    Judy Thomas: I would get letters back from these companies, saying, "This, in fact, is not you."

    Steve Kroft: You still couldn't get it off your credit report?

    Judy Thomas: No, I sent copies to the credit bureaus. And they would come back as mine, verified, verified. I also hired an-- a local attorney to try and straighten it out. We had everything certified that this is Judy Thomas. This is where I live. I've never gone by the name of Kendall. I've never even been to Utah, let alone owing a cable company in Utah.

    Steve Kroft: And what happened?

    Judy Thomas: Nothing.

    Steve Kroft: Nothing?

    Judy Thomas: Nothing.

    Steve Kroft: What kind of problems did this cause for you?

    Judy Thomas: I couldn't refinance. I couldn't take advantage of the interest rates. I couldn't get a new-- I couldn't get a car. I couldn't cosign for my children's student loans. And I'd worked hard for my credit. I was-- and these people were taking it away from me.

    Finally Judy Thomas took the only recourse available to her. She sued Equifax and TransUnion in federal court. And after a year-long battle, the credit reporting agencies settled for an undisclosed sum and promised to clean up her file.

    Steve Kroft: Did you think it was going to take a federal lawsuit?

    Judy Thomas: Heck no. It just takes a human being going, "Wow, this isn't Judith Kendall. Let me fix this." That's all they had to do.

    But as we discovered, that almost never happens.

    If you challenge a credit report and mail your information to a post office box in the United States, the dispute will likely be investigated in India, or the Philippines or South America. We traveled 5,000 miles to the Chilean capital of Santiago where we tracked down three former Experian employees.

    Carolina Herrera, Rodolfo Carrasco and Enzo Valdivia were all dispute agents at Experian's national consumer assistance center although they say they weren't able offer consumers much assistance.

    Steve Kroft: So, if somebody had a problem with their credit report, they would send the complaint, and it would end up with you?

    Many voices: Yeah. Oh, yeah.

    Steve Kroft: So how many of these did you have to do a day?

    Rodolfo Carrasco: Ninety.

    Steve Kroft: Ninety?

    Carolina Herrera: Ninety, yeah.

    Steve Kroft: Did you consider yourself investigators?

    Many voices: No.

    Steve Kroft: Did you have any way to investigate these claims?

    Carolina Herrera: No, we didn't. You can't call the person.

    Steve Kroft: You can't pick up the phone and call them?

    Many voices: No.

    Steve Kroft: Did you have phones?

    Many voices: No. No.

    Steve Kroft: Could you email them?

    Many voices: No.

    Steve Kroft: Did you have the authority to say, "Wait a minute," after looking at somebody's file, and say that, you know, "This is a-- somebody made a mistake; this person doesn't owe this money"?

    Rodolfo Carrasco: We didn't have that power.

    All they did was read the disputes and reduce them to a two-digit code like "never late" or "not mine." It was then sent with a two or three-line summary and no documentation back to the bank or department store that furnished the original information.

    Steve Kroft: If there was a difference of opinion between the creditor and the person who was filing the complaint, how was it usually resolved in the-- in favor of the creditor?

    Enzo Valdivia: Yeah. The creditor was always right.

    Rodolfo Carrasco: Mostly, we took for granted the word of the bank. If the bank said, "Hey, this guy owes $100," so it is.

    Sylvia Goldsmith: None of us have ever interviewed anybody in Chile from Experian. We've got a federal court ordering them to bring these people forward. And we're still waiting.

    Much of what's known about the inner workings of the consumer credit agencies comes out of lawsuits filed by Len Bennett and Sylvia Goldsmith, who have subpoenaed company records and deposed employees and executives. They say under the current system, there is no way for people like Judy Thomas to get their problems solved.

    Steve Kroft: So all these people who take the time to meticulously document a case that the bill isn't theirs or the bill has been paid -- that is never seen by anybody?

    Len Bennett: It's not seen by anyone who considers it in determining whether or not information will be removed from a credit report.

    Steve Kroft: It's not forwarded onto the person who has the complaint with you?

    Len Bennett: No. It is never forwarded on, never forwarded onto the creditor.

    Sylvia Goldsmith: We can get a jury verdict for $1 million. That's chump change to some of these bureaus. They would rather pay a verdict in $1 million than to actually go in and change the policies and procedures that they have, because that's much more expensive to them.

    Len Bennett: I can say this. Without qualification, the dispute procedures used by the credit reporting agencies uniformly used completely fail to comply with the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Courts have found that. The Federal Trade Commission has found that. It's not even a close call.

    Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine agreed.

    Mike DeWine: I think the industry's a mess. And I think the impact it has on real people is just unconscionable.

    Steve Kroft: You think they're breaking the law?

    Mike DeWine: I think they're breaking the law. There is no doubt in my mind that they are breaking the law.

    We wanted to talk to Equifax, TransUnion and Experian. But like most consumers, we were unsuccessful. The agencies referred us to the spokesman for their lobbying group in Washington. He too declined our request for an on-camera interview, but did provide a written statement citing an industry sponsored survey that showed 95 percent of its customers were satisfied with the dispute process. The industry maintains it is in compliance with federal law.
    Last edited by GoingDown; 02-11-2013, 05:53 AM.
    The world's simplest C & D Letter:
    "I demand that you cease and desist from any communication with me."
    Notice that I never actually mention or acknowledge the debt in my letter.

    #2
    This bad error prone reporting system has been this way for 20 plus years. Congress enacted several laws after each study that makes it easier for us to remove errors. Didn't work so swell as they found loopholes. Last study I saw from the 90's said 80 % had errors. So don't hold out any hopes that much will change.

    This is also the very reason I tell people not to correct or add info to their reports. I have had clients who wanted current phone numbers added and old addresses they did live at but weren't reported added. Ugh...those things have no bearing on your credit worthiness and on top of that it makes them money by selling the info.

    Snakes....

    Comment


      #3
      i remember years back i would do a "spring" cleaning of our credit yearly.

      i would promptly send out correspondence by cert mail challenging any and all errors. i faintly recall some type of "law" stating that if the agency did not respond within 30 days of the request they the item must be removed as UN-challeged?? i know we got a few things removed that way. now i see our reports they are SOOOOOOOOOOOO messed up, for the good as well as bad, so i'm just not touching them.
      8/4/2008 MAKE SURE AND VISIT Tobee's Blogs! http://www.bkforum.com/blog.php?32727-tobee43 and all are welcome to bk forum's Florida State Questions and Answers on BK http://www.bkforum.com/group.php?groupid=9

      Comment


        #4
        I did get some things removed totally by disputing, But one account got totally messed up by my disputing it. I finally waited a few months and disputed it making clear the error and it did get corrected finally. I found that if you dispute one thing at a time (instead of several on one dispute) it usually got corrected with one dispute.
        I was quite upset with a reaffirmed car, I never stop paying for on time and it showed up IIB, after my dispute they just removed it totally. I had wanted it put on positve , instead of negative.
        chpt 7 ,5-2009

        Comment


          #5
          Hey Tobee, what you are speaking of is when you dispute the accuracy of an account, the credit bureau notifies the creditor, the creditor has x days to respond back to bureau, then bureau responds back to you. They either correct it per the creditors updates or if they do not hear back at all, they will delete it. All of that has a timeline of 30 days, except for online disputes (which make no sense to me) but they are allowed 45 days to respond back to you.

          Hope that made sense. Quite a convoluted process but totally automated. Almost NO contact with a human unless you are a super VIP.

          Comment


            #6
            yes, it makes perfect sense. but you know, i remember in those days they gave you a ref # and when you called you actually spoke with a REAL person, here in the USA...lol OH...those were the days!
            8/4/2008 MAKE SURE AND VISIT Tobee's Blogs! http://www.bkforum.com/blog.php?32727-tobee43 and all are welcome to bk forum's Florida State Questions and Answers on BK http://www.bkforum.com/group.php?groupid=9

            Comment


              #7
              The only 100 percent certain way to correct errors on a credit report is to contact the creditor who reported the false information to the credit reporting agencies and force them to revise their advice.

              Credit reporting agencies have neither the time nor the inclination to investigate whether what is reported to them is accurate.

              Comment


                #8
                ^Absolutely

                Comment


                  #9
                  What a mess... I haven't had any issues in the past, but I will be checking my yearly from now on.

                  Comment

                  bottom Ad Widget

                  Collapse
                  Working...
                  X