Originally posted by justbroke
View Post
we had our choice when we moved to florida to go federal or wait the two years. since, on top of the state versus federal law options, you must also pay attention to the residency requirements. the 2005 revisions to the bankruptcy laws created new residency requirements for debtors. congress wanted to discourage people from moving to states with more liberal exemptions and then filing for bankruptcy. you must, therefore, have lived in a state for two years before you can use that state’s exemptions. if we had lived there for less than 2 years, we would have had to had count back 2 years from the date we filed for bankruptcy and then look at where we had lived for the 180 days (6 months) before that. whichever state you have lived in for the longest time during that 6-month period is the state whose exemptions you can use. some states, though, don’t allow you to use their exemptions unless you currently live in that state. and if you get caught in this gap, you’ll have to use the federal exemptions. that's why we personally had to literally go "underground" for two full years, to establish legal residency in the state.
new jersey is where we came from and they don't even have a homestead exemption it's ....actually theirs reads as :None, but survivorship interest of a spouse in property held as tenancy by the entirety is exempt from creditors of a single spouse. so of course we would have had to use federal exemption had be filed there. florida was much better in their allowance and at the least we had no problem keeping our car.
i also think that the trustees here in florida are doing exactly as jb describes becoming firmer and turning many cases into "asset" cases, mainly because they are. although, i have heard a few whopping stories...example just recently where a trustee made someone sell a trailer here on the forum and the first 5800 was exempt. the trailer sold for 6600 and the auctioneer wanted 2k!! that didn't work out to well for the trustee's percentage, so that example was a bit over board with the trustee going after an asset that really wasn't there. just a comment tho, the trustee had the trailer appraised from the thread and it was suppose to have appraised at 12k, however, only went for 6600k at the auction.
also, i do believe trustee's are beginning to see the light at the end of the tunnel, or better said, the pot of gold at the end of the rainbow is becoming empty so they are hitting hard as i'm certain many trustees made a nice amount the past few years on many people's assets.
Leave a comment: