Announcement

Collapse

Forum Rules (Everyone Must Read!!!) (updated: 04/28/2015)

Welcome to the Bankruptcy Forum. Bankruptcy (BK) Forum is known as BKForum.com and will be referred to as BKF hereinafter. In order to ensure a long term success of our vibrant community, we have established certain rules and guidelines to which everyone must adhere to. Please take your time to carefully read our rules, before you start to participate in the community.

Things you agree to do:
BKFORUM.com (BKF) users agree to use the search function before starting a new thread. This prevents duplicate discussions and allows for better organized topics.

All BKF users agree to read the sticky posts which may be available at the top of a forum page. These Sticky posts often contain valuable information. They may also outline more rules and guidelines specific for that particular forum, stickies are put in place by that forums moderator(s) or admin(s).

Things you agree not to do:

All BKF users agree not to call people names or write a post simply to make a personal attack, or get a negative reaction; this behavior is not allowed on our forum. The use of derogatory language aimed at anyone will be severely dealt with. There is no need to agree with each other, or to even like each other. However, by signing onto BKForum.com you agree to treat each member and guest with the respect they deserve. No threats or personal attacks will be allowed.

All BKF users agree not to discuss, engage, or encourage any behavior or activity which violates the law. Discussion of drugs, violence, murder, theft, vandalism, fraud or any other issue which could be used to help individuals break the law is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to "bump" old threads, unless there is a specific benefit to the community by doing so. But in most cases, please don't post in very old threads, instead start new threads.

All BKF users agree not to attempt/use another members account. It is against BKF rules to use any account other than your own. Impersonating another member will result in an immediate ban. It is also against the rules to open more than one account in your own name without permission from a moderator or administrator. If you have been banned for any reason, it is against the rules to open another account. If you were banned temporarily and you are caught using another account you will be banned permanently. Choosing a moniker which is similar in either sound or spelling as a moderator or administrator is strictly forbidden.

All BKF users agree not to private message any moderator, admin, or other member with questions related to their personal circumstances (Questions about the forum or issues with the forum are ok). This forum only works when members share their experience and insights with everyone.

Things you agree not to post:
All BKF users agree not to post any derogatory/racist/or sexist remarks. This includes attachments, links and all information contained within posts, signatures, and avatars, failure to comply with this rule will result in a permanent ban.

All BKF users agree not to post any copyrighted or trademarked information without the express written permission of the owner(s) / proper citation of source.

All BKF users agree not to post any real names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, social security numbers, or any other personal details (their own or other people's).

All BKF users agree not to post links, pictures, attachments, videos, or the like of pornographic content, objectionable material or extreme violence, whether cartoon or real.

All BKF users agree not to use BKF for advertising purposes without a written contract between yourself/company/agent and the administration of BKF. Blatant advertising will result in a ban.

All BKF users agree not to spam the forums. Spam includes but is not limited to posting erroneous, non-relevant-useless, off-topic, or meaningless posts. Spam may also include posts which contain no text, or large areas of blank space between lines. Simply posting emoticons without text is considered spam. BKF is the largest bankruptcy message board and all the content is intended to help other users. Please help us improve the quality of our forum by making sure that your posts are well-worded, spell checked, grammatically correct and syntaxed.

Regarding actions of moderators and administrators:

The forum is no place to air out your opinion or be judgmental of our staff and its capabilities.

All BKF users agree not to abuse or mistreat moderators or administrators. It is against BKF rules to post any information regarding bans or any other action taken by a member of the moderating or administrative team. If you wish to discuss bans or warnings please do so via PM. To place a complaint against a moderator, send a PM to a super moderator. All Moderators are equal, any decision made by a moderator must be adhered to. If a moderator tells you something you do not like, do not go to another moderator looking for a different answer. If you are caught doing this you will be banned. The moderators work as a team and respect the decisions made by their peers and will help enforce them unless an administrator tells them differently.
If you have an issue with how the forum is run, then notify one of our administrator and we will look into the situation. We have in the past and still do appreciate any input that you offer this forum. But critical input and/or judgmental postings towards the staff will result in you getting banned.


Should you find a thread offensive or out of line, then notify a Mod in a PM so they can evaluate the situation and do the action deemed necessary.

All moderators do have active "other" lives outside of the forum and help moderate this forum in their spare time throughout the days and weeks.

If you have a problem with a member or Mod follow the proper channels of reporting it.

BKF reserves the right to delete any posts which contain anti-BKF comments or discussion. Any bashing of moderators or administrators, or any of their discussion or actions will also be deleted, and the responsible posting party(s) will be banned. Any public anti-BKF advertising, communication, or posts on another forum will result in permanent bans as well.

All warnings and bans are decided by individual moderators and administrators. Warnings are preferable to bans however, for serious offenses and repeat abusers bans will go into effect. The length of the bans can vary from several hours to permanent.

All messages posted or sent including through PM are the property of BKforum.com.

All BKF users agree not to advertiser on the forum (Niether by posting, private messaging or using your signature). If you are a company/attorney/legal adviser wishing to advertise on the site or sell a product, you must contact the head administrator and inquire about our advertising packages.

All bankruptcy related opinions expressed on BKForum.com are those of their authors and not necessarily of BKF, its staff or representatives.

You agree not to copy any material/post/content from BKF without written permission from our head administrator .

By posting on this forum you agree to these terms and conditions, including any punishment deemed appropriate by moderators or administrators in the event of an offense.

Administrators/Moderators can change these rules at any time without prior notice.
See more
See less

Trustee Objection to Exemptions

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Trustee Objection to Exemptions

    Editorial Note: This is a really advanced question and my parents have retained an attorney to pursue this but I thought I’d throw it out there for any insights you all might have.

    My parents filed Chapter 7 pro se and have hit a bit of a snag with the trustee. They own a rental house originally purchased with her sister, for my (now-deceased) grandmother to live in. After my grandmother passed the house was turned to use as a rental. My parents are not on the mortgage but are on the title. They had been on the mortgage in the past but a number of years ago (seven or more, maybe) it was transferred out of their names (quit claim) and refinanced in my aunt’s name only. They were subsequently added back on the title but not the mortgage.

    My aunt manages the property, collects the rent and pays the mortgage, which is only in her name anyway. My parents have no role in the management of the property and the property is currently mortgaged for more than its value. There was a joint checking account that she shared with my aunt that the trustee has seized (with the assistance of Wells Fargo. The funds in the account were exempted using the Federal Wildcard 522(d)(5).

    The trustee has filed an objection to the exemption of the bank account with the following reason:

    “On the basis that the Debtors have a rental house, and if the Debtor were to exempt the funds in the bank account, the Trustee may pursue collection of rents and to sell the rental house.”


    To me this sounds like a threat from the trustee, something like, “let me keep the bank account and I’ll leave the rental alone.” My parents have received no income or tax deductions for the rental, this is backed up by their tax filings for the past several years.

    A couple of things come to mind. In order for the trustee to be able to take the rental property, which has no equity at present, I believe he will need to avoid the lien. This looks to be a long shot for him, but if the bank did something wrong then he may have a shot. This would be the worst possible outcome as it leaves my aunt on the hook for the mortgage, for which she would no longer have any property generating rental income to pay it.

    Questions:
    Is the trustee correct in stating that he is entitled to collect rents after a Chapter 7 filing? The filing was in New Mexico and the rental property is in California. Since my parents are not on the mortgage and take no role in managing the property, is it possible that rental income after filing is part of the bankruptcy estate?

    Would it make sense to do something like offer the trustee half of the bank account if he’ll abandon the rental property?

    We will see what the attorney says, but I would be interested in any input in the meantime.
    Case Closed > 2/08/2010

  • #2
    If the funds in the bank account are in fact exempt, then your parents should be able to prevail. The rental property, if in fact it has no equity, is not an asset and the trustee cannot avoid a properly perfected mortgage lien in order to sell it. The trustee is also not entitled to rental income going forward, because the income did not exist upon filing, and is not property of the bankruptcy estate.

    That being said, depending on the amount of money at stake, and what your parents' attorney is charging, it may be cheaper to settle. The trustee has unlimited resources to fight a protracted legal battle, and unfortunately, your parents do not.

    Comment


    • #3
      Remember, my view is always the view of the Trustee and aggressive creditors and may not reflect the Trustee's reach. First, I think the statement by the Trustee is a threat. I would never have recommended filing Pro Se where you own any property, especially property where you are on the title, but not the mortgage!

      Originally posted by BobMango View Post
      Is the trustee correct in stating that he is entitled to collect rents after a Chapter 7 filing? The filing was in New Mexico and the rental property is in California. Since my parents are not on the mortgage and take no role in managing the property, is it possible that rental income after filing is part of the bankruptcy estate?
      First, you have to dispatch with what are your parent's property rights. Is the property being held as a Tenancy In Common or some sort of Joint Tenancy. I won't pretend to know all the intricacies of how property is titled, but, how that property is titled could affect how far the Trustee can reach!

      The titling issue is interesting because California's default is that it's a Tenancy In Common (TIC) - an "undivided" interest each in half the property. If the Trustee is looking at how the property is held, and it's TIC, then the Trustee may believe that the Debtor's Estate actually DOES own half the property and the property is property of the Estate with 1/2 interest. The Trustee could move to sell the property. Your parent's attorney will be looking specifically at this.

      Contrary to bcohen's theory where no equity means not property of the Estate, I find it not so simple. The fact is, it is property of the Estate. Now, the Trustee may need to abandon a "worthless" property, but if there is a titling issue which has exposed a 1/2 interest, this could be an issue. For example, say the Trustee motions to sell free and clear of liens... then it's an issue! Would the Trustee win such a motion... I can't tell you. (Remember, this is just my crazy alter-ego as a Trustee. Also, remember that, at least in my State of Florida, Trustees have done even crazier things selling underwater homes for a carve out!)


      (Read 11 USC 363(h) if you want an idea of how far this "sell free and clear" reaches. There are only four conditions to meet in order for the Trustee to do so, and not one mentions equity.)

      Originally posted by BobMango View Post
      Would it make sense to do something like offer the trustee half of the bank account if he’ll abandon the rental property?
      Maybe. That's something that your attorney would need to work out. You want to make sure it's a "good" offer and that the Trustee won't take the money and still pursue the home.

      Nothing that I wrote is meant to scare you, but to let you be aware that the Trustee's powers are pretty, um, powerful. Yes, they can sell things free and clear of liens to get to a debtor's interest. Now, is this whole thing just to scare your parents into giving up the bank account? I would say, perhaps, yes and it reads like a threat. A settlement may be in order. As bcohen stated, maybe an offer of half the bank account. I would not do anything without speaking with an attorney about any of this, and I would use an attorney to litigate this issue.
      Chapter 7 (No Asset/Non-Consumer) Filed (Pro Se) 7/08 (converted from Chapter 13 - 2/10)
      Status: (Auto) Discharged and Closed! 5/10
      Visit My BKForum Blog: justbroke's Blog


      I am not an attorney. Any advice provided is not legal advice.

      Comment


      • #4
        With all due respect, BC’s answer to your inquiry is not correct.

        1. The rental property IS property of the bk estate subject only to your aunt’s ownership interest (I assume - 50%). Who is responsible for the loan or is managing the property is not relevant based upon the information you have provided.

        2. Post petition rents generated from property of the estate BELONG to the bk estate subject only to the co-owner’s 50% interest. Unless the lien holder has a valid and properly invoked “assignment of rents” those rents do not belong to the creditor nor should they be paid to the creditor without the Trustee’s approval. This covers at least 50% of every post petition rental payment and those funds should be given to the Trustee unless he states otherwise or abandons the rental property.

        3. The fact that the property is underwater DOES NOT stop the Trustee from attempting a short sale. There are numerous posts on this forum addressing a Trustee’s attempt to find $$ where there is none. The co-owner might have a say in this but the Trustee has the right to sell both the estate's and the co-owner's interest in property.

        The issues your parents are facing are not uncommon. I see such things many times each year mostly stemming from pro se cases. The Trustee is holding the exempt funds hostage and waiting for an offer to settle the dispute with the rental property. Your parents need to find a good attny who knows how to negotiate such a settlement.

        Lastly, your parents MUST timely respond to the exemption objection or they will lose that argument. Alternatively they can try to get the Trustee to give them an “open extension” regarding the need to respond. . . but they need to do something and I strongly recommend that they do not do it pro se.

        Des.
        Last edited by despritfreya; 01-09-2014, 09:27 PM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Thanks for the responses. Seems to be a case where reaching a settlement may be the quickest and least risky approach. They will have the attorney file their response to the objections and look to negotiate a settlement.

          As JB indicated, the trustee has all the time and resources he needs to get what he wants. Same reason a lot of criminal defendants take a plea bargain, you might win at trial, but the cost of losing is too much of a risk.
          Case Closed > 2/08/2010

          Comment

          Unconfigured Ad Widget

          Collapse
          Working...
          X